Suppr超能文献

住院患者样本中催眠诱导剖面图(HIP)与成人斯坦福催眠临床量表(SHCS:A)的同时效度研究:简要报告

A concurrent validity study between the Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) and the Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for Adults (SHCS:A) in an inpatient sample: a brief report.

作者信息

Gritzalis Nicoletta, Oster Marc, Frischholz Edward J

机构信息

John J. Madden Mental Health Center, Hines, IL 60141-7000, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Hypn. 2009 Oct;52(2):89-93. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2009.10401700.

Abstract

The Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) is a brief, standardized assessment of hypnotizability which takes 5-10 minutes to administer. The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for Adults (SHCS:A) is a different clinical measure of hypnotizability that takes about 20-25 minutes to administer. Although both scales purport to measure the same thing, they were based on different theories of hypnosis and constructed using different psychometric techniques. The present investigation is a concurrent validation study comparing scores on the two instruments in a sample of 24 inpatients. The correlation between the SHCS:A and HIP Induction score was 0.41 (p < .01). However, the Eye Roll Sign (ERS) did not correlate significantly with either the SHCS:A (.04, ns) or the HIP-IND score (-.05, ns). These results indicate that while scores on the HIP and SHCS:A are significantly correlated the inter-correlations are not high enough to consider them as interchangeable measures. Implications of these findings for future research are discussed.

摘要

催眠诱导剖面图(HIP)是一种对催眠易感性的简短、标准化评估,实施过程需要5至10分钟。斯坦福成人催眠临床量表(SHCS:A)是另一种对催眠易感性的临床测量方法,实施过程大约需要20至25分钟。尽管这两种量表都旨在测量相同的内容,但它们基于不同的催眠理论,并采用不同的心理测量技术构建。本研究是一项同步验证研究,在24名住院患者样本中比较两种工具的得分。SHCS:A与HIP诱导得分之间的相关性为0.41(p < .01)。然而,眼球转动信号(ERS)与SHCS:A(.04,无统计学意义)或HIP-IND得分(-.05,无统计学意义)均无显著相关性。这些结果表明,虽然HIP和SHCS:A的得分显著相关,但相互之间的相关性不够高,不足以将它们视为可互换的测量方法。讨论了这些发现对未来研究的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验