Gritzalis Nicoletta, Oster Marc, Frischholz Edward J
John J. Madden Mental Health Center, Hines, IL 60141-7000, USA.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2009 Oct;52(2):89-93. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2009.10401700.
The Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) is a brief, standardized assessment of hypnotizability which takes 5-10 minutes to administer. The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for Adults (SHCS:A) is a different clinical measure of hypnotizability that takes about 20-25 minutes to administer. Although both scales purport to measure the same thing, they were based on different theories of hypnosis and constructed using different psychometric techniques. The present investigation is a concurrent validation study comparing scores on the two instruments in a sample of 24 inpatients. The correlation between the SHCS:A and HIP Induction score was 0.41 (p < .01). However, the Eye Roll Sign (ERS) did not correlate significantly with either the SHCS:A (.04, ns) or the HIP-IND score (-.05, ns). These results indicate that while scores on the HIP and SHCS:A are significantly correlated the inter-correlations are not high enough to consider them as interchangeable measures. Implications of these findings for future research are discussed.
催眠诱导剖面图（HIP）是一种对催眠易感性的简短、标准化评估，实施过程需要5至10分钟。斯坦福成人催眠临床量表（SHCS:A）是另一种对催眠易感性的临床测量方法，实施过程大约需要20至25分钟。尽管这两种量表都旨在测量相同的内容，但它们基于不同的催眠理论，并采用不同的心理测量技术构建。本研究是一项同步验证研究，在24名住院患者样本中比较两种工具的得分。SHCS:A与HIP诱导得分之间的相关性为0.41（p < .01）。然而，眼球转动信号（ERS）与SHCS:A（.04，无统计学意义）或HIP-IND得分（-.05，无统计学意义）均无显著相关性。这些结果表明，虽然HIP和SHCS:A的得分显著相关，但相互之间的相关性不够高，不足以将它们视为可互换的测量方法。讨论了这些发现对未来研究的意义。
