• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[肝脏纤维化临床与病理变化的磁共振扩散加权成像对比研究]

[Comparative study on clinical and pathological changes of liver fibrosis with diffusion-weighted imaging].

作者信息

Zhou Mei-Ling, Yan Fu-Hua, Xu Peng-Ju, Chen Cai-Zhong, Shen Ji-Zhang, Li Ren-Chen, Ji Yuan, Shi Jian-Ying

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jul 7;89(25):1757-61.

PMID:19862980
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical practical value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements based on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) for quantification of liver fibrosis and inflammation for hepatitis viral infection.

METHODS

Diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging was prospectively performed on 85 patients with chronic hepatitis and on 22 healthy volunteers within a single breath-hold using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence at b values of 100, 300, 500, 800 and 1000 s/mm2 respectively. ADC values of liver were measured with five different b values. The inflammation grades and fibrosis stages were evaluated histologically by biopsy. One-way analysis of variance and Spearman' s rank correlation test were used for statistical analysis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in predicting the presence of stage > or = 2 and stage > or = 3 hepatic fibrosis, and grade > or = 1 hepatic inflammation.

RESULTS

There was moderate negative correlation between hepatic ADC values and fibrosis stage. And the best correlation was obtained for a b value of 800 s/mm2 (r = -0.697, P = 0. 000). At all b values there was a significant decrease in hepatic ADC in patients with stage < or = 1 versus stage > or = 2 fibrosis and stage < or = 2 versus stage > or = 3 fibrosis (P < 0.05). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage > or = 2 and > or = 3 fibrosis. The areas under the curve were 0.909 vs 0.917, sensitivity 76.6% vs 80.0% and specificity 88.3% vs 91.5% (ADC with a b value of 800 s/mm2, 1.26 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less and 1.19 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less). There was weak to moderate negative correlation between ADCs and inflammation grade. Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of grade > 1 inflammation with an area under the curve of 0.781, sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 86.4% (ADC with a b value of 500 s/mm2, 1.54 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less).

CONCLUSION

The DWI measurement of hepatic ADC can be used to quantify liver fibrosis and inflammation. It will be a new approach for early diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up of hepatic fibrosis.

摘要

目的

评估基于扩散加权磁共振成像(DWI)测量表观扩散系数(ADC)对病毒性肝炎感染所致肝纤维化和炎症进行定量分析的临床实用价值。

方法

对85例慢性肝炎患者和22名健康志愿者采用单次激发自旋回波平面回波序列,在单次屏气状态下前瞻性地进行并行成像的扩散加权磁共振成像,b值分别为100、300、500、800和1000 s/mm2。用5种不同b值测量肝脏的ADC值。通过活检组织学评估炎症分级和纤维化分期。采用单因素方差分析和Spearman秩相关检验进行统计分析。采用受试者工作特征分析评估ADC预测≥2期和≥3期肝纤维化以及≥1级肝脏炎症的效能。

结果

肝脏ADC值与纤维化分期呈中度负相关。b值为800 s/mm2时相关性最佳(r = -0.697,P = 0.000)。在所有b值下,纤维化分期≤1期与≥2期、≤2期与≥3期患者的肝脏ADC均显著降低(P < 0.05)。肝脏ADC是≥2期和≥3期纤维化的显著预测指标。曲线下面积分别为0.909对0.917,敏感度76.6%对80.0%,特异度88.3%对91.5%(b值为800 s/mm2时,ADC为1.26×10(-3) mm2/s及以下和1.19×10(-3) mm2/s及以下)。ADC与炎症分级呈弱至中度负相关。肝脏ADC是炎症分级>1级的显著预测指标,曲线下面积为0.781,敏感度为60.0%,特异度为86.4%(b值为500 s/mm2时,ADC为1.54×10(-3) mm2/s及以下)。

结论

肝脏ADC的DWI测量可用于定量肝纤维化和炎症。这将是肝纤维化早期诊断和治疗随访的一种新方法。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study on clinical and pathological changes of liver fibrosis with diffusion-weighted imaging].[肝脏纤维化临床与病理变化的磁共振扩散加权成像对比研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jul 7;89(25):1757-61.
2
Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience.扩散加权磁共振成像用于肝纤维化定量评估:初步经验
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):799-806. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2086.
3
Diffusion-weighted MRI in evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhotic patients.扩散加权磁共振成像在评估肝纤维化中的应用:肝硬化患者的可行性研究
Radiol Med. 2007 Apr;112(3):394-408. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0149-1. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
4
Chronic hepatitis: role of diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and inflammation.慢性肝炎:弥散加权成像和弥散张量成像在肝纤维化及炎症诊断中的作用
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jul;28(1):89-95. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21227.
5
Relevance of b-values in evaluating liver fibrosis: a study in healthy and cirrhotic subjects using two single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.b值在评估肝纤维化中的相关性:一项使用两种单次激发自旋回波平面回波扩散加权序列对健康受试者和肝硬化患者的研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Aug;28(2):411-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21461.
6
[A pilot study of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in a rabbit model].兔模型中磁共振扩散加权成像对肝纤维化的初步研究
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2008 Jul;16(7):500-4.
7
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver of hepatitis C patients.丙型肝炎患者肝脏的扩散加权磁共振成像
NMR Biomed. 2003 May;16(3):132-6. doi: 10.1002/nbm.818.
8
Contribution of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver.扩散加权磁共振成像在肝硬化肝脏中肝细胞癌和发育异常结节特征描述中的作用
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Jul;34(4):506-12. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181da3671.
9
Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis with diffusion-weighted imaging: value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient using the spleen as reference organ.弥散加权成像诊断肝纤维化和肝硬化:应用脾脏作为参照器官的标准化表观弥散系数的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):671-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3448.
10
The effect of liver iron deposition on hepatic apparent diffusion coefficient values in cirrhosis.肝硬化患者肝铁沉积对肝脏表观弥散系数值的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Oct;199(4):803-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7541.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver diffusivity in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of breathhold and free-breathing techniques.健康志愿者和慢性肝病患者的肝脏弥散度:屏气和自由呼吸技术的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jan;35(1):103-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22748. Epub 2011 Oct 27.