Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):671-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3448.
The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) versus normalized liver ADC using the spleen as a reference organ for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.
Fifty-six patients, 34 with liver disease and 22 control subjects, were assessed with breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging using b values of 0, 50, and 500 s/mm(2). Liver ADC and normalized liver ADC (defined as the ratio of liver ADC to spleen ADC) were compared between patients stratified by fibrosis stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the performance of ADC and normalized liver ADC for prediction of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Reproducibility was assessed by measuring coefficient of variation (n = 7).
Liver ADC failed to distinguish individual stages of fibrosis, except between stages 0 and 4. There were significant differences in normalized liver ADC between control livers and intermediate stages of fibrosis (stages 2-3) and cirrhosis (stage 4) and between stages 1 and 4, and there was a trend toward significance between stages 0 and 1 (p = 0.051) and stages 1 and 3 (p = 0.06). ROC analysis showed that normalized liver ADC was superior to liver ADC for detection of stage > or = 2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.864 vs 0.655; p = 0.013) and stage > or =3 (0.805 vs 0.689; p = 0.015), without a difference for diagnosing cirrhosis (0.935 vs 0.720; p = 0.185). Normalized liver ADC had higher reproducibility than ADC (mean coefficient of variation, 3.5% vs 12.6%).
Our results suggest that normalizing liver ADC with spleen ADC improves diagnostic accuracy for detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis when using breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging, with better reproducibility.
本研究旨在比较肝脏表观扩散系数(ADC)与以脾脏为参照器官的标准化肝脏 ADC 用于诊断肝纤维化和肝硬化的诊断准确性。
对 56 例患者(34 例肝病患者和 22 例对照者)进行了屏气单次激发平面回波扩散加权成像检查,使用的 b 值分别为 0、50 和 500 s/mm2。将患者按纤维化分期分层,比较 ADC 和标准化肝脏 ADC(定义为肝脏 ADC 与脾脏 ADC 的比值)之间的差异。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估 ADC 和标准化肝脏 ADC 对肝纤维化和肝硬化的预测性能。通过测量变异系数(n = 7)评估重复性。
肝脏 ADC 无法区分纤维化的各个阶段,除了 0 期和 4 期之间。在正常肝脏与纤维化的中间阶段(2-3 期)和肝硬化(4 期)之间,以及在 1 期和 4 期之间,标准化肝脏 ADC 存在显著差异,在 0 期和 1 期之间(p = 0.051)和 1 期和 3 期之间(p = 0.06)有趋势性差异。ROC 分析表明,标准化肝脏 ADC 优于肝脏 ADC 用于检测 >或= 2 期(ROC 曲线下面积,0.864 与 0.655;p = 0.013)和 >或= 3 期(0.805 与 0.689;p = 0.015),但对诊断肝硬化无差异(0.935 与 0.720;p = 0.185)。标准化肝脏 ADC 的重复性优于 ADC(平均变异系数,3.5%与 12.6%)。
本研究结果表明,在使用屏气扩散加权成像时,用脾脏 ADC 对肝脏 ADC 进行标准化可提高肝纤维化和肝硬化的诊断准确性,且具有更好的可重复性。