• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥散加权成像诊断肝纤维化和肝硬化:应用脾脏作为参照器官的标准化表观弥散系数的价值。

Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis with diffusion-weighted imaging: value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient using the spleen as reference organ.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):671-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3448.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.3448
PMID:20729445
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) versus normalized liver ADC using the spleen as a reference organ for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients, 34 with liver disease and 22 control subjects, were assessed with breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging using b values of 0, 50, and 500 s/mm(2). Liver ADC and normalized liver ADC (defined as the ratio of liver ADC to spleen ADC) were compared between patients stratified by fibrosis stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the performance of ADC and normalized liver ADC for prediction of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Reproducibility was assessed by measuring coefficient of variation (n = 7).

RESULTS

Liver ADC failed to distinguish individual stages of fibrosis, except between stages 0 and 4. There were significant differences in normalized liver ADC between control livers and intermediate stages of fibrosis (stages 2-3) and cirrhosis (stage 4) and between stages 1 and 4, and there was a trend toward significance between stages 0 and 1 (p = 0.051) and stages 1 and 3 (p = 0.06). ROC analysis showed that normalized liver ADC was superior to liver ADC for detection of stage > or = 2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.864 vs 0.655; p = 0.013) and stage > or =3 (0.805 vs 0.689; p = 0.015), without a difference for diagnosing cirrhosis (0.935 vs 0.720; p = 0.185). Normalized liver ADC had higher reproducibility than ADC (mean coefficient of variation, 3.5% vs 12.6%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that normalizing liver ADC with spleen ADC improves diagnostic accuracy for detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis when using breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging, with better reproducibility.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较肝脏表观扩散系数(ADC)与以脾脏为参照器官的标准化肝脏 ADC 用于诊断肝纤维化和肝硬化的诊断准确性。

材料与方法

对 56 例患者(34 例肝病患者和 22 例对照者)进行了屏气单次激发平面回波扩散加权成像检查,使用的 b 值分别为 0、50 和 500 s/mm2。将患者按纤维化分期分层,比较 ADC 和标准化肝脏 ADC(定义为肝脏 ADC 与脾脏 ADC 的比值)之间的差异。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估 ADC 和标准化肝脏 ADC 对肝纤维化和肝硬化的预测性能。通过测量变异系数(n = 7)评估重复性。

结果

肝脏 ADC 无法区分纤维化的各个阶段,除了 0 期和 4 期之间。在正常肝脏与纤维化的中间阶段(2-3 期)和肝硬化(4 期)之间,以及在 1 期和 4 期之间,标准化肝脏 ADC 存在显著差异,在 0 期和 1 期之间(p = 0.051)和 1 期和 3 期之间(p = 0.06)有趋势性差异。ROC 分析表明,标准化肝脏 ADC 优于肝脏 ADC 用于检测 >或= 2 期(ROC 曲线下面积,0.864 与 0.655;p = 0.013)和 >或= 3 期(0.805 与 0.689;p = 0.015),但对诊断肝硬化无差异(0.935 与 0.720;p = 0.185)。标准化肝脏 ADC 的重复性优于 ADC(平均变异系数,3.5%与 12.6%)。

结论

本研究结果表明,在使用屏气扩散加权成像时,用脾脏 ADC 对肝脏 ADC 进行标准化可提高肝纤维化和肝硬化的诊断准确性,且具有更好的可重复性。

相似文献

1
Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis with diffusion-weighted imaging: value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient using the spleen as reference organ.弥散加权成像诊断肝纤维化和肝硬化:应用脾脏作为参照器官的标准化表观弥散系数的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):671-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3448.
2
[Comparative study on clinical and pathological changes of liver fibrosis with diffusion-weighted imaging].[肝脏纤维化临床与病理变化的磁共振扩散加权成像对比研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jul 7;89(25):1757-61.
3
Diffusion-weighted MRI in evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhotic patients.扩散加权磁共振成像在评估肝纤维化中的应用:肝硬化患者的可行性研究
Radiol Med. 2007 Apr;112(3):394-408. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0149-1. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
4
Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.弥散加权 MRI 评估肝纤维化和肝硬化的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1556-60. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2436.
5
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the spleen in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.肝硬化和门静脉高压症患者脾脏的弥散加权成像(DWI)。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep;31(7):1092-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
6
Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience.扩散加权磁共振成像用于肝纤维化定量评估:初步经验
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):799-806. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2086.
7
Relevance of b-values in evaluating liver fibrosis: a study in healthy and cirrhotic subjects using two single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.b值在评估肝纤维化中的相关性:一项使用两种单次激发自旋回波平面回波扩散加权序列对健康受试者和肝硬化患者的研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Aug;28(2):411-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21461.
8
Chronic hepatitis: role of diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and inflammation.慢性肝炎:弥散加权成像和弥散张量成像在肝纤维化及炎症诊断中的作用
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jul;28(1):89-95. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21227.
9
Assessing liver fibrosis: comparison of arterial enhancement fraction and diffusion-weighted imaging.评估肝纤维化:动脉强化分数与扩散加权成像的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Nov;40(5):1137-46. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24472. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
Diffusion-weighted MRI versus transient elastography in quantification of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases.磁共振弥散加权成像与瞬时弹性成像在慢性胆汁淤积性肝病患者肝纤维化定量中的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Oct;81(10):2500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.10.024. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-and gender-related variations of liver diffusion metrics apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and diffusion derived vessel density (DDVD), and explanations with the known physiological T2 relaxation time variations among different volunteers' groups.肝脏扩散指标表观扩散系数(ADC)和扩散衍生血管密度(DDVD)的年龄和性别相关变化,以及对不同志愿者群体中已知生理T2弛豫时间变化的解释。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 May 26;25(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01730-0.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging features of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3.进行性家族性肝内胆汁淤积症 3 型的磁共振成像特征。
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;64(Suppl 1):102-108. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01324-x. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Variabilities in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of the spleen and the paraspinal muscle: A single center large cohort study.
脾脏和椎旁肌表观扩散系数(ADC)测量的变异性:一项单中心大样本队列研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 12;9(7):e18166. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18166. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Correction to: Comparison of diffusion‑weighted imaging and MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta‑analysis.对《扩散加权成像与磁共振弹性成像在肝纤维化分期中的比较:一项荟萃分析》的勘误
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Aug;48(8):2763-2768. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03942-w.
5
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) regional nodal disease at standard lymphadenectomy: is MRI accurate for identifying node-positive patients?胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)标准淋巴结清扫术时的区域淋巴结疾病:MRI 能准确识别淋巴结阳性患者吗?
Eur Radiol. 2023 Sep;33(9):5976-5983. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09597-x. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
6
Quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.腹部和盆腔的定量扩散 MRI。
Med Phys. 2022 Apr;49(4):2774-2793. doi: 10.1002/mp.15246. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
7
Diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: challenges and some solutions for the quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion.肝脏的扩散加权磁共振成像:表观扩散系数和体素内不相干运动定量的挑战与一些解决方案
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Apr 15;11(2):107-142. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.扩散加权成像与磁共振弹性成像在肝纤维化分期中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Aug;46(8):3889-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03055-2. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis.弥散加权磁共振成像在慢性病毒性肝炎肝纤维化评估中的应用。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0248024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248024. eCollection 2021.
10
Comparison of MR-PWI quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters for the evaluation of liver fibrosis.MR-PWI 定量和半定量参数在肝纤维化评估中的比较。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00539-3.