Lizaso Elgarresta Izarne, Sánchez De Miguel Manuel, Reizabal Arruabarrena Luixa
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad del País Vasco, San Sebastián, España.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
Due to a series of factors such as working conditions, economic position and health status, retirement does not necessarily occur at the age of 65 years, thus generating new types of retirement.
To study the possible relationship between retirement types and psychological health indicators, i.e. depression, anxiety and life satisfaction and to analyze perceptions and feelings about the change produced as a result of retirement.
A total of 119 retired persons (68.1% men, 31.9% women) participated in this study. The mean age was 66.5 years. Participants were interviewed individually. The instruments used were the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, an ad hoc interview, in which sociodemographic data and information on retirement were gathered, the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Philadelphia Geriatric Center Life Satisfaction Scale, and lastly, the COOP-WONCA Health-Related Quality of Life Scale.
Participants who retired due to illness had higher levels of anxiety and depression and lower life satisfaction than persons retiring for other reasons. The ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences (p<.001) only in life satisfaction. After the corresponding regression analysis was performed on this variable, a statistically significant model was found that grouped together four predictive variables: anxiety (p<.001), depression (p<.001), income bracket (p<.001) and physical status (p<.05). These variables explained 46% of the variance.
In line with other studies, the present study found that retirement is not associated with depression, although retirement due to illness is associated with poorer psychological health. The results on life satisfaction support the idea that retirement is no longer a homogeneous event. Retirement type does not appear to be a major predictor of life satisfaction.
由于工作条件、经济状况和健康状况等一系列因素,退休不一定发生在65岁,从而产生了新型退休方式。
研究退休类型与心理健康指标(即抑郁、焦虑和生活满意度)之间的可能关系,并分析对退休所产生变化的认知和感受。
共有119名退休人员(男性占68.1%,女性占31.9%)参与了本研究。平均年龄为66.5岁。对参与者进行了单独访谈。使用的工具包括简易便携式精神状态问卷、一份专门设计的访谈(用于收集社会人口统计学数据和退休信息)、戈德堡焦虑抑郁量表、费城老年中心生活满意度量表,以及最后使用的COOP-WONCA健康相关生活质量量表。
因病退休的参与者比因其他原因退休的人有更高的焦虑和抑郁水平,生活满意度更低。方差分析显示仅在生活满意度方面存在统计学显著差异(p<.001)。对该变量进行相应的回归分析后,发现了一个具有统计学显著性的模型,该模型将四个预测变量归为一组:焦虑(p<.001)、抑郁(p<.001)、收入等级(p<.001)和身体状况(p<.05)。这些变量解释了46%的方差。
与其他研究一致,本研究发现退休与抑郁无关,尽管因病退休与较差的心理健康有关。生活满意度的结果支持了退休不再是一个同质化事件的观点。退休类型似乎不是生活满意度的主要预测因素。