Suppr超能文献

一项关于补充叶酸与复发性结直肠腺瘤风险的随机试验。

A randomized trial on folic acid supplementation and risk of recurrent colorectal adenoma.

作者信息

Wu Kana, Platz Elizabeth A, Willett Walter C, Fuchs Charles S, Selhub Jacob, Rosner Bernard A, Hunter David J, Giovannucci Edward

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1623-31. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28319. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence from observational studies suggests that inadequate folate status enhances colorectal carcinogenesis, but results from some randomized trials do not support this hypothesis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of folic acid supplementation on recurrent colorectal adenoma, we conducted a cost-efficient, double-blind, randomized trial among participants of 2 large prospective cohorts, the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study and the Nurses' Health Study.

DESIGN

Participants were randomly assigned to receive folic acid (1 mg/d) (n = 338) or placebo (n = 334) for 3-6.5 y. The primary endpoint was any new diagnosis of adenoma during the study period (May 1996-March 2004). Secondary outcomes were adenoma by site and stage and number of recurrent adenomas. Associations were also examined by plasma folate concentrations at baseline.

RESULTS

Incidence of at least one recurrent adenoma was not significantly associated with folic acid supplementation [relative risk (RR): 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59,1.13; P = 0.22]. Among participants with low plasma folate concentrations at baseline (<or=7.5 ng/mL), those randomly assigned to receive folic acid experienced a significant decrease in adenoma recurrence (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.90; P = 0.01), whereas for subjects with high folate concentrations at baseline (>7.5 ng/mL), supplemental folic acid had no significant effect (RR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.82, 1.99; P = 0.27, P(interaction) = 0.01). Contrary to findings from another clinical trial, there was no evidence for an increased risk of advanced or multiple adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support an overall protective effect of folic acid supplementation on adenoma recurrence. Folic acid supplementation may be beneficial among those with lower folate concentrations at baseline. This trial was registered at clinical trials.gov as NCT00512850.

摘要

背景

观察性研究的证据表明,叶酸水平不足会增强结直肠癌的发生,但一些随机试验的结果并不支持这一假设。

目的

为了评估补充叶酸对复发性结直肠腺瘤的影响,我们在两个大型前瞻性队列研究(健康专业人员随访研究和护士健康研究)的参与者中进行了一项经济高效的双盲随机试验。

设计

参与者被随机分配接受叶酸(1毫克/天)(n = 338)或安慰剂(n = 334),为期3 - 6.5年。主要终点是研究期间(1996年5月至2004年3月)任何新诊断的腺瘤。次要结局是按部位和阶段划分的腺瘤以及复发性腺瘤的数量。还根据基线时的血浆叶酸浓度检查了相关性。

结果

至少一个复发性腺瘤的发生率与补充叶酸无显著相关性[相对风险(RR):0.82;95%置信区间:0.59,1.13;P = 0.22]。在基线时血浆叶酸浓度低(≤7.5纳克/毫升)的参与者中,随机分配接受叶酸的参与者腺瘤复发显著减少(RR:0.61;95%置信区间:0.42,0.90;P = 0.01),而对于基线时叶酸浓度高(>7.5纳克/毫升)的受试者,补充叶酸没有显著影响(RR:1.28;95%置信区间:0.82,1.99;P = 0.27;P(交互作用)= 0.01)。与另一项临床试验的结果相反,没有证据表明晚期或多发性腺瘤的风险增加。

结论

我们的结果不支持补充叶酸对腺瘤复发具有总体保护作用。补充叶酸可能对基线时叶酸浓度较低的人群有益。该试验在临床试验.gov上注册为NCT00512850。

相似文献

7
Uracil misincorporation into DNA and folic acid supplementation.尿嘧啶碱基误掺入 DNA 及叶酸补充。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jan;91(1):160-5. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28527. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

5
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate.关于叶酸可耐受最高摄入量的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2023 Nov 13;21(11):e08353. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8353. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Genome-wide interaction analysis of folate for colorectal cancer risk.叶酸与结直肠癌风险的全基因组交互作用分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Nov;118(5):881-891. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
The relationship between folic acid and colorectal cancer; a literature review.叶酸与结直肠癌之间的关系;文献综述。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul 12;80:104170. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104170. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌的化学预防。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):368-388. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.047. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
9

本文引用的文献

3
Aspirin and folic acid for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas.阿司匹林与叶酸预防结直肠腺瘤复发
Gastroenterology. 2008 Jan;134(1):29-38. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.014. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
10
Vitamins and minerals: efficacy and safety.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Aug;66(2):427-37. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.2.427.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验