Wu Kana, Platz Elizabeth A, Willett Walter C, Fuchs Charles S, Selhub Jacob, Rosner Bernard A, Hunter David J, Giovannucci Edward
Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1623-31. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28319. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
Evidence from observational studies suggests that inadequate folate status enhances colorectal carcinogenesis, but results from some randomized trials do not support this hypothesis.
To assess the effect of folic acid supplementation on recurrent colorectal adenoma, we conducted a cost-efficient, double-blind, randomized trial among participants of 2 large prospective cohorts, the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study and the Nurses' Health Study.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive folic acid (1 mg/d) (n = 338) or placebo (n = 334) for 3-6.5 y. The primary endpoint was any new diagnosis of adenoma during the study period (May 1996-March 2004). Secondary outcomes were adenoma by site and stage and number of recurrent adenomas. Associations were also examined by plasma folate concentrations at baseline.
Incidence of at least one recurrent adenoma was not significantly associated with folic acid supplementation [relative risk (RR): 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59,1.13; P = 0.22]. Among participants with low plasma folate concentrations at baseline (<or=7.5 ng/mL), those randomly assigned to receive folic acid experienced a significant decrease in adenoma recurrence (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.90; P = 0.01), whereas for subjects with high folate concentrations at baseline (>7.5 ng/mL), supplemental folic acid had no significant effect (RR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.82, 1.99; P = 0.27, P(interaction) = 0.01). Contrary to findings from another clinical trial, there was no evidence for an increased risk of advanced or multiple adenomas.
Our results do not support an overall protective effect of folic acid supplementation on adenoma recurrence. Folic acid supplementation may be beneficial among those with lower folate concentrations at baseline. This trial was registered at clinical trials.gov as NCT00512850.
观察性研究的证据表明,叶酸水平不足会增强结直肠癌的发生,但一些随机试验的结果并不支持这一假设。
为了评估补充叶酸对复发性结直肠腺瘤的影响,我们在两个大型前瞻性队列研究(健康专业人员随访研究和护士健康研究)的参与者中进行了一项经济高效的双盲随机试验。
参与者被随机分配接受叶酸(1毫克/天)(n = 338)或安慰剂(n = 334),为期3 - 6.5年。主要终点是研究期间(1996年5月至2004年3月)任何新诊断的腺瘤。次要结局是按部位和阶段划分的腺瘤以及复发性腺瘤的数量。还根据基线时的血浆叶酸浓度检查了相关性。
至少一个复发性腺瘤的发生率与补充叶酸无显著相关性[相对风险(RR):0.82;95%置信区间:0.59,1.13;P = 0.22]。在基线时血浆叶酸浓度低(≤7.5纳克/毫升)的参与者中,随机分配接受叶酸的参与者腺瘤复发显著减少(RR:0.61;95%置信区间:0.42,0.90;P = 0.01),而对于基线时叶酸浓度高(>7.5纳克/毫升)的受试者,补充叶酸没有显著影响(RR:1.28;95%置信区间:0.82,1.99;P = 0.27;P(交互作用)= 0.01)。与另一项临床试验的结果相反,没有证据表明晚期或多发性腺瘤的风险增加。
我们的结果不支持补充叶酸对腺瘤复发具有总体保护作用。补充叶酸可能对基线时叶酸浓度较低的人群有益。该试验在临床试验.gov上注册为NCT00512850。