Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):822-30. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533081632. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
To provide a broad perspective concerning the recent use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in medical imaging by reviewing ROC studies published in Radiology between 1997 and 2006 for experimental design, imaging modality, medical condition, and ROC paradigm.
Two hundred ninety-five studies were obtained by conducting a literature search with PubMed with two criteria: publication in Radiology between 1997 and 2006 and occurrence of the phrase "receiver operating characteristic." Studies returned by the query that were not diagnostic imaging procedure performance evaluations were excluded. Characteristics of the remaining studies were tabulated.
Two hundred thirty-three (79.0%) of the 295 studies reported findings based on observers' diagnostic judgments or objective measurements. Forty-three (14.6%) did not include human observers, with most of these reporting an evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system or functional data obtained with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The remaining 19 (6.4%) studies were classified as reviews or meta-analyses and were excluded from our subsequent analysis. Among the various imaging modalities, MR imaging (46.0%) and CT (25.7%) were investigated most frequently. Approximately 60% (144 of 233) of ROC studies with human observers published in Radiology included three or fewer observers.
ROC analysis is widely used in radiologic research, confirming its fundamental role in assessing diagnostic performance. However, the ROC studies reported in Radiology were not always adequate to support clear and clinically relevant conclusions.
通过回顾 1997 年至 2006 年期间在《放射学》杂志上发表的 ROC 研究,为医学影像学中最近使用 ROC 分析提供广泛的视角,涉及实验设计、成像方式、医学状况和 ROC 范例。
通过在 PubMed 上进行文献检索,使用两个标准获得 295 项研究:1997 年至 2006 年期间在《放射学》杂志上发表的文章和出现“接收器操作特性”一词的文章。排除查询返回的不是诊断成像程序性能评估的研究。对其余研究的特征进行了制表。
295 项研究中的 233 项(79.0%)报告了基于观察者诊断判断或客观测量的研究结果。43 项(14.6%)没有包括人类观察者,其中大多数报告了计算机辅助诊断系统的评估或使用计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振(MR)成像获得的功能数据。其余 19 项(6.4%)研究被归类为综述或荟萃分析,并从我们随后的分析中排除。在各种成像方式中,磁共振成像(46.0%)和 CT(25.7%)研究最频繁。在《放射学》杂志上发表的有人类观察者的 233 项 ROC 研究中,约有 60%(144 项)有 3 名或更少的观察者。
ROC 分析在放射学研究中得到广泛应用,证实了其在评估诊断性能中的基本作用。然而,《放射学》杂志上报告的 ROC 研究并不总是足以支持明确和具有临床相关性的结论。