Institute of Pathology, Western Reserve University, Cleveland.
J Exp Med. 1932 Jan 1;55(1):27-30. doi: 10.1084/jem.55.1.27.
The method of study has an objective somewhat different from, and lacking the precision of, the ratio of Addis and the urea clearance of Van Slyke. It serves, however, to demonstrate that although for a month after unilateral nephrectomy the remaining kidney shows diminished capacity to hold blood urea within the normal range, nevertheless after 4 months this function is maintained in essentially the same degree as if both kidneys were present. This does not imply that all activities of the kidney remaining after unilateral nephrectomy are potentially augmented, but the data offered justify the conclusion that as the remaining kidney undergoes enlargement its functional capacity increases and the process represents a genuine hypertrophy in the critical sense.
该研究方法的目的与 Addis 比值和范斯莱克的尿素清除率略有不同,且缺乏后者的精确性。然而,它证明了尽管在单侧肾切除术后一个月内,剩余的肾脏在维持血液尿素在正常范围内的能力降低,但 4 个月后,其功能基本保持不变,就像两个肾脏都存在一样。这并不意味着单侧肾切除术后剩余肾脏的所有活动都具有潜在的增强作用,但所提供的数据证明了这样一个结论,即随着剩余肾脏的增大,其功能能力也增加,这一过程代表了真正意义上的增生。