Syphilis Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, and the United States Public Health Service, Washington, D. C.
J Exp Med. 1938 Mar 31;67(4):495-514. doi: 10.1084/jem.67.4.495.
Small amounts of formaldehyde inhibited the precipitating activity of horse diphtheria antitoxin with toxin and of horse antipneumococcus serum with the homologous capsular carbohydrate. Approximately 1 part of commercial formaldehyde to 1000 parts of serum, acting for 24 hours, inhibited the flocculating activity completely. In both cases, the combining affinity of the treated antibody for the corresponding antigen was not demonstrably affected, as determined both by in vitro experiments and by animal protection. More intensive treatment of the antipneumococcus serum caused an apparent loss of its bacterial agglutinating activity, but on centrifugation the organisms cohered: combination had occurred, and only the spontaneous aggregation was prevented. These effects are the same as those previously described for diazo compounds, and have been qualitatively reproduced with acetaldehyde, benzaldehyde and butyraldehyde. The quantitative relationships suggest that only a few groups in the antibody molecule need be modified by formaldehyde in order to prevent aggregation; and it is probable that these are some of the free NH(2) groups of the antibody protein. In marked contrast, the combining affinity of both antipneumococcus antibody and diphtheria antitoxin for the corresponding antigens was only slightly affected by amounts of formaldehyde which sufficed to block the free NH(2) groups rapidly and almost completely. Similarly, this amount of treatment did not affect the reactivity of these two antisera acting as antigen with a rabbit antiserum versus horse serum. The integrity of the NH(2) groups is apparently not essential for the activity of these sera acting either as antigen or as antibody; and the slow disappearance of their activity in concentrated HCOH is apparently to be ascribed to some secondary reaction other than the simple addition of HCOH to free NH(2) groups. The present experiments do not support the theory that antigen-antibody aggregates are lattice-like structures built up from elementary antigen-antibody compounds because of residual specific combining groups. The aggregating activity of both antipneumococcus serum and diphtheria antitoxin was completely inhibited by procedures which did not demonstrably affect their combining power with antigen. This suggests that the aggregation of antigen-antibody compounds is a secondary, non-specific reaction. It is perhaps significant that the amount of formaldehyde which just sufficed to prevent aggregation also caused a marked increase in the solubility of the pneumococcus antibody, which could then no longer be precipitated at serum pH by dilution with water or by dialysis. This strongly suggests that the loss of precipitating activity is actually due to the increased solubility of the antibody and supports the hypothesis that the primary cause of specific antigen-antibody aggregation is the relative insolubility of the bound antibody.
少量的甲醛能抑制马破伤风抗毒素与毒素、马抗肺炎球菌血清与同型荚膜多糖的沉淀作用。大约每 1000 份血清中加入 1 份商业用甲醛,作用 24 小时,就能完全抑制絮状沉淀作用。在这两种情况下,用这种方法处理过的抗体与相应抗原的结合亲和力都没有明显的改变,这可以从体外实验和动物保护实验中得到证明。更强烈地处理抗肺炎球菌血清,会引起其细菌凝集活性明显丧失,但经离心后,细菌仍保持聚集状态:结合已经发生,只是自发聚集被阻止了。这些效应与以前描述的重氮化合物的效应相同,用乙醛、苯甲醛和丁醛也能定性地重现。定量关系表明,甲醛只需修饰抗体分子中的少数几个基团,就能阻止聚集;很可能这些基团是抗体蛋白的一些游离的-NH2 基团。与此形成鲜明对比的是,当甲醛的量足以迅速且几乎完全地封闭游离的-NH2 基团时,它对肺炎球菌抗体和破伤风抗毒素与相应抗原的结合亲和力的影响只有轻微的。同样,用这种量的甲醛处理也不会影响这两种抗血清作为抗原与兔抗血清对抗马血清的反应性。-NH2 基团的完整性对于作为抗原或抗体的这两种抗血清的活性显然不是必需的;而且,在浓 HCOH 中,它们的活性缓慢消失,这显然归因于除了 HCOH 与游离-NH2 基团的简单加成之外的某种次级反应。目前的实验并不支持这样的理论,即抗原-抗体聚集物是由剩余的特异性结合基团构成的基本抗原-抗体化合物的晶格状结构。抗肺炎球菌血清和破伤风抗毒素的聚集活性完全被抑制,而这些处理方法并没有明显影响它们与抗原的结合能力。这表明,抗原-抗体化合物的聚集是一种次级的、非特异性的反应。也许有意义的是,刚好足以阻止聚集的甲醛量也显著增加了肺炎球菌抗体的溶解度,使它在血清 pH 值下不能再通过用水稀释或透析沉淀出来。这强烈表明沉淀活性的丧失实际上是由于抗体溶解度的增加,并且支持了这样的假说,即特异性抗原-抗体聚集的主要原因是结合抗体的相对不溶性。