NHS Evidence-Skin Disorders, Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Apr;35(3):223-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03734.x. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
This review summarizes clinically important findings from systematic reviews indexed in bibliographical databases between August 2007 and August 2008 that dealt with disease prevention (six reviews) and treatment of atopic eczema (seven reviews). Regarding disease prevention, two independent systematic reviews found some clinical trial evidence that ingestion of probiotics by mothers during pregnancy might reduce the incidence of subsequent eczema. Another review failed to find any clear benefit of prebiotics in eczema prevention. Although furry pets are often cited as causing allergic disease, a systematic review of observational studies found no evidence that exposure to cats or dogs at birth increases eczema risk. One very large review of studies of breastfeeding found some evidence of a protective effect on eczema risk, although all the studies were limited by their observational nature. A German group has attempted an overview of eczema prevention studies with a view to informing national guidelines. In terms of eczema treatment, two systematic reviews have confirmed the efficacy of topical tacrolimus ointment. Another review of 31 trials confirms the efficacy of topical pimecrolimus, although many of those trials were vehicle controlled, which limits their clinical utility. A review of 23 studies of desensitization therapy for allergic diseases found some evidence of benefit for eczema, which needs to be explored further. Despite the popularity of antistaphylococcal therapies for eczema, a Cochrane Review of 21 trials failed to show any clear benefit for any of the therapies for infected or clinically noninfected eczema. Another Cochrane Review dealt with dietary exclusions for people with eczema and found little evidence to support any dietary exclusion, apart from avoidance of eggs in infants with suspected egg allergy supported by evidence of sensitization. A review of 13 studies of probiotics for treating established eczema did not show convincing evidence of a clinically worthwhile benefit, an observation that has been substantiated in a subsequent Cochrane Review.
这篇综述总结了 2007 年 8 月至 2008 年 8 月期间在文献数据库中索引的系统评价中与疾病预防(6 项综述)和特应性皮炎治疗(7 项综述)相关的具有临床重要意义的发现。关于疾病预防,两项独立的系统评价发现了一些临床试验证据,表明母亲在怀孕期间摄入益生菌可能会降低随后发生特应性皮炎的几率。另一项综述未能发现益生元在预防特应性皮炎方面有任何明显益处。尽管毛茸茸的宠物常被认为会导致过敏疾病,但一项针对观察性研究的系统评价发现,出生时接触猫或狗并不会增加特应性皮炎的风险。一项对母乳喂养研究的大型综述发现,母乳喂养对特应性皮炎风险有一定的保护作用,但所有研究都受到其观察性质的限制。一个德国研究小组试图对特应性皮炎预防研究进行概述,以期为国家指南提供信息。在特应性皮炎治疗方面,两项系统评价证实了外用他克莫司软膏的疗效。另一项对 31 项试验的综述证实了外用吡美莫司的疗效,但其中许多试验是与载体对照进行的,这限制了其临床应用。对 23 项脱敏治疗过敏性疾病的研究进行的综述发现,特应性皮炎有一定的益处,需要进一步探索。尽管抗葡萄球菌疗法在特应性皮炎中很受欢迎,但一项对 21 项试验的 Cochrane 综述未能证明任何一种疗法对感染或非感染性特应性皮炎有明显益处。另一项 Cochrane 综述涉及特应性皮炎患者的饮食排除疗法,除了对疑似鸡蛋过敏的婴儿进行鸡蛋回避(有过敏敏感的证据支持)外,几乎没有证据支持任何饮食排除疗法。对 13 项治疗已确诊特应性皮炎的益生菌的研究进行的综述没有显示出有临床价值的益处的令人信服的证据,这一观察结果在随后的 Cochrane 综述中得到了证实。