University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, Indiana 47712, USA.
J Nurs Educ. 2010 Mar;49(3):156-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090915-03. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
Although the use of anecdotal notes by faculty to document clinical performance is thought to be a common practice, no empirical study of this evaluation tool has been conducted. To investigate the frequency and pattern of use, a faculty questionnaire was developed using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation model as a framework. The model was adapted to focus on clinical nursing education. Sixty-four nursing faculty from six schools participated in the regional study. A descriptive design was used to collect quantitative data from clinical faculty. Findings indicated that 97% of clinical faculty use anecdotal notes during the student evaluation process, and the majority of faculty do so on a weekly basis. Based on faculty feedback and the CIPP evaluation model, a clinical nursing faculty tool was developed after study completion to support clinical faculty in note use.
尽管教师使用轶事记录来记录临床表现被认为是一种常见的做法,但尚未对这种评估工具进行实证研究。为了调查其使用频率和模式,我们使用 Context、Input、Process、Product(CIPP)评估模型作为框架开发了教师问卷。该模型经过调整,重点关注临床护理教育。来自六所学校的 64 名护理教师参加了区域研究。采用描述性设计从临床教师那里收集定量数据。研究结果表明,97%的临床教师在学生评估过程中使用轶事记录,大多数教师每周都会这样做。根据教师的反馈和 CIPP 评估模型,在研究完成后开发了一种临床护理教师工具,以支持临床教师使用记录。