Suppr超能文献

护理学院的临床评估与分级实践:全国调查结果第二部分

Clinical evaluation and grading practices in schools of nursing: national survey findings part II.

作者信息

Oermann Marilyn H, Yarbrough Suzanne S, Saewert Karen J, Ard Nell, Charasika Margie E

机构信息

School of Nursing, Univeristy of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(6):352-7.

Abstract

To better understand how nurse educators evaluate and grade students' clinical practice, the Evaluation of Learning Advisory Council of the National League for Nursing conducted a survey of faculty (N = 1,573) in all types of prelicensure RN programs. This article describes the findings of that survey in relation to clinical evaluation and grading clinical practice. Nearly all faculty used a clinical evaluation tool to rate students' performance in the clinical setting (n = 1,534, 98 percent); most programs had the same basic tool in all courses, but modified to reflect the unique aspects of each course (n = 1,095, 70 percent). Faculty (n = 1,116, 83 percent) reported using pass/fail for grading in clinical courses rather than a letter or numerical grade.

摘要

为了更好地了解护理教育工作者如何评估和给学生的临床实习打分,美国国家护理联盟学习评估咨询委员会对所有类型的注册护士前教育项目中的教员(N = 1573)进行了一项调查。本文描述了该调查中与临床评估及临床实习评分相关的结果。几乎所有教员都使用临床评估工具来评定学生在临床环境中的表现(n = 1534,98%);大多数项目在所有课程中使用相同的基本工具,但会进行修改以反映每门课程的独特之处(n = 1095,70%)。教员(n = 1116,83%)报告称在临床课程评分中使用及格/不及格,而非字母或数字等级。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验