Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Evol Dev. 2009 Nov-Dec;11(6):647-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00372.x.
Digit identity in the avian wing is a classical example of conflicting anatomical and embryological evidence regarding digit homology. Anatomical in conjunction with phylogenetic evidence supports the hypothesis that the three remaining digits in the bird wing are digits 1, 2, and 3. At the same time, various lines of embryological evidence support the notion that these digits develop in positions that normally produce digits 2, 3, and 4. In recent years, gene expression as well as experimental evidence was published that supports the hypothesis that this discrepancy arose from a digit identity shift in the evolution of the bird wing. A similar but less well-known controversy has been ongoing since the late 19th century regarding the identity of the digits of the three-toed Italian skink, Chalcides chalcides. Comparative anatomy identifies these digits as 1, 2, and 3, while embryological evidence suggests their derivation from embryological positions 2, 3, and 4. Here we re-examine this evidence and add gene expression data to determine the identity of the three digits of C. chalcides. The data confirm that the adult and the embryological evidence for digit identity are in conflict, and the expression of Hoxd11 suggests that digits 1, 2, and 3 develop in positions 2, 3, and 4. We conclude that in C. chalcides, and likely in its close relatives, a digit identity frame shift has occurred, similar to the one in avian evolution. This result suggests that changes in of digit identity might be a more frequent consequence of digit reduction than previously assumed.
鸟类翅膀的digit identity 是一个经典的例子,它展示了关于digit 同源性的解剖学和胚胎学证据之间存在冲突。解剖学结合系统发育学证据支持这样的假设,即鸟类翅膀上剩余的三个digit 分别是digit 1、2 和 3。与此同时,各种胚胎学证据支持这样的观点,即这些digit 是在正常产生 digit 2、3 和 4 的位置发育而来的。近年来,基因表达和实验证据的发表支持了这样一种假说,即这种差异是由于鸟类翅膀进化过程中的 digit identity 转变而产生的。自 19 世纪后期以来,关于三趾意大利石龙子(Chalcides chalcides)的digit 身份的类似但鲜为人知的争议一直在持续。比较解剖学将这些digit 识别为 1、2 和 3,而胚胎学证据表明它们源自胚胎学位置 2、3 和 4。在这里,我们重新检查了这些证据,并添加了基因表达数据,以确定 C. chalcides 的三个 digit 的身份。数据证实,成年和胚胎学证据之间的digit identity 存在冲突,Hoxd11 的表达表明 digit 1、2 和 3 是在位置 2、3 和 4 发育而来的。我们得出结论,在 C. chalcides 中,可能在其近亲中,发生了 digit identity 框架移位,类似于鸟类进化中的情况。这一结果表明,digit identity 的变化可能是 digit 减少的更常见后果,而不是以前假设的那样。