Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 1R8.
Sex Abuse. 2010 Mar;22(1):42-57. doi: 10.1177/1079063209352094. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
Phallometric testing is widely considered the best psychophysiological procedure for assessing erotic preferences in men. Researchers have differed, however, on the necessity of setting some minimum criterion of penile response for ascertaining the interpretability of a phallometric test result. Proponents of a minimum criterion have generally based their view on the intuitive notion that "more is better" rather than any formal demonstration of this. The present study was conducted to investigate whether there is any empirical evidence for this intuitive notion, by examining the relation between magnitude of penile response and the agreement in diagnoses obtained in two test sessions using different laboratory stimuli. The results showed that examinees with inconsistent diagnoses responded less on both tests and that examinees with inconsistent diagnoses responded less on the second test after controlling for their response on the first test. Results also indicated that at response levels less than 1 cm(3), diagnostic consistency was no better than chance, supporting the establishment of a minimum response level criterion.
阴茎体积描记检测被广泛认为是评估男性性偏好的最佳心理生理学程序。然而,研究人员对于确定阴茎体积描记检测结果的可解释性是否需要设定一些最低阴茎反应标准存在分歧。支持最低标准的人通常基于这样一种直观的观点,即“越多越好”,而不是对此进行任何形式的正式证明。本研究旨在通过检查使用不同实验室刺激物进行的两次测试中诊断结果的一致性与阴茎反应幅度之间的关系,来调查这种直观观点是否有任何经验证据。结果表明,诊断不一致的被试在两次测试中的反应都较小,并且在控制第一次测试的反应后,诊断不一致的被试在第二次测试中的反应也较小。结果还表明,在反应水平低于 1 立方厘米时,诊断一致性并不优于偶然,这支持了建立最低反应水平标准的观点。