• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴茎勃起测试在儿童性兴趣评估中的有效性:一项元分析综述。

Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.

机构信息

1 University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

2 Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):535-551. doi: 10.1177/1073191117706139. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1177/1073191117706139
PMID:28454493
Abstract

Valid assessment of pedohebephilic interests (i.e., sexual interest in children) is fundamental to forensic clinical practice. Phallometric testing-which measures changes in penile circumference or volume, while stimuli depicting different ages and sexual activities are presented-is widely used in clinical and research settings to detect such interests. This meta-analysis summarizes studies comparing sexual offenders against children and various types of controls on phallometric tests for pedohebephilic interests (37 samples; N = 6,785) and studies examining the relationship between phallometric test scores and sexual reoffending (16 samples; N = 2,709). The findings suggest that several phallometric testing procedures are valid indicators of pedohebephilic interest. Certain methodological features of phallometric tests were associated with greater validity, such as, slide or audio-plus-slide stimuli and z-score-based indices. In addition, phallometric tests for pedohebephilic, pedophilic, and hebephilic interests predicted sexual reoffending which provides further evidence that phallometric test scores are valid indicators of sexual interest in children. In general, the interpretation of phallometric test scores as indicators of pedohebephilic interests is supported.

摘要

对恋童癖(即对儿童的性兴趣)的有效评估是法医临床实践的基础。阴茎体积描记法测试——通过测量阴茎周长或体积的变化,同时呈现不同年龄和性活动的刺激物——被广泛用于临床和研究环境中,以检测此类兴趣。本荟萃分析总结了比较恋童癖(37 个样本;N = 6785)和研究检查阴茎体积描记测试分数与性再犯之间关系的性犯罪者与各种类型的对照者的研究(16 个样本;N = 2709)。研究结果表明,几种阴茎体积描记测试程序是恋童癖兴趣的有效指标。阴茎体积描记测试的某些方法特征与更大的有效性相关,例如幻灯片或音频加幻灯片刺激物和基于 z 分数的指数。此外,恋童癖、恋童癖和恋童癖兴趣的阴茎体积描记测试预测了性再犯,这进一步证明了阴茎体积描记测试分数是儿童性兴趣的有效指标。总的来说,阴茎体积描记测试分数作为恋童癖兴趣指标的解释得到了支持。

相似文献

1
Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.阴茎勃起测试在儿童性兴趣评估中的有效性:一项元分析综述。
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):535-551. doi: 10.1177/1073191117706139. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
2
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia.青少年色情癖阴茎测量测试的敏感性和特异性。
J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1940-50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12970. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
3
Detecting anomalous sexual interests in juvenile sex offenders.检测青少年性犯罪者的异常性兴趣。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Jun;989:118-30; discussion 144-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07298.x.
4
Increasing Valid Profiles in Phallometric Assessment of Sex Offenders with Child Victims: Combining the Strengths of Audio Stimuli and Synthetic Characters.增加对有儿童受害者的性犯罪者进行阴茎勃起反应评估的有效档案:结合音频刺激和合成人物的优势。
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Feb;47(2):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1053-y. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) May Be a Measure of Pedohebephilia.修订后的恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)可能是恋童癖和恋少癖的一种测量工具。
J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1655-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Phallometric comparison of pedophilic interest in nonadmitting sexual offenders against stepdaughters, biological daughters, other biologically related girls, and unrelated girls.对不承认罪行的恋童癖性犯罪者对继女、亲生女儿、其他有血缘关系的女孩以及无血缘关系女孩的恋童癖兴趣进行阴茎测量比较。
Sex Abuse. 2006 Jan;18(1):1-14. doi: 10.1177/107906320601800101.
7
The discriminative validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interests among adolescent sex offenders against children.针对儿童的青少年性犯罪者中,阴茎测量测试对恋童癖兴趣的区分效度。
Psychol Assess. 2000 Sep;12(3):319-27. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.12.3.319.
8
Absolute versus relative ascertainment of pedophilia in men.男性恋童癖的绝对与相对确定。
Sex Abuse. 2009 Dec;21(4):431-41. doi: 10.1177/1079063209347906.
9
Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders.对不承认的性犯罪者进行恋童癖阴茎测量测试的敏感性和特异性。
Psychol Assess. 2001 Mar;13(1):118-26. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.13.1.118.
10
The validity of phallometric assessment with rapists: comments on Looman & Marshall (2005).对强奸犯进行阴茎测量评估的有效性:对卢曼和马歇尔(2005年)的评论。
Sex Abuse. 2007 Mar;19(1):61-8; Discussion 69-72. doi: 10.1177/107906320701900106.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood Sexual Victimization, Pedophilic Interest, and Antisocial Orientation.童年期性侵害、恋童癖兴趣与反社会倾向
Sex Offending. 2022 Apr 11;17:e5425. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.5425. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Validation of the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) in Portugal.葡萄牙修订后的恋童癖筛查量表(SSPI-2)的验证。
Sex Abuse. 2024 Oct;36(7):848-869. doi: 10.1177/10790632241268502. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Exploratory rasch analysis of a static-99R clinical cohort assessment.静态-99R 临床队列评估的探索性拉斯克分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307216. eCollection 2024.
4
Self-report psychopathy-III facet scores predict sexual crimes, sexual preferences, and sexual deviance index validity more precisely than total scores.自我报告式精神病态量表三(Self-report psychopathy-III)的子维度得分比总分能更精确地预测性犯罪、性偏好和性变态指数的效度。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 25;15:1359720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359720. eCollection 2024.
5
Childhood Adversity and Offense-Supportive Cognitions Among Czech Adults with a Sexual Interest in Violence or Children.童年逆境与性暴力或儿童相关兴趣成年人的犯罪支持认知。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jun;53(6):2159-2172. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02837-1. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Rare, but potentially risky, high individual increase of self-reported sexual arousal in men, who have committed sexual offenses against children, while being confronted with experimental sexual stimuli - a retrospective data analysis.对儿童实施性犯罪的男性在面对实验性性刺激时,自我报告的性唤起出现罕见但可能有风险的高度个体性增加——一项回顾性数据分析。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Mar;37(3):238-250. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00802-5. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
7
The Viewing Reaction Time as a Diagnostic Tool of Pedohebephilia in the Dunkelfeld.《暗区中窥淫癖的观看反应时间作为诊断工具》
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):25-42. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02662-y. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations.性刺激在研究和临床环境中的应用:专家意见与建议。
Sex Med. 2023 May 26;11(2):qfad012. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad012. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
The Predictive Validity of the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2).修订版恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Aug;35(5):649-663. doi: 10.1177/10790632221149696. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
10
Validating the Screening Scale of Pedophilic Crime Scene Behavior.验证恋童癖犯罪现场行为筛查量表。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):4085-4096. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02354-z. Epub 2022 Jul 27.