Wyschkon Anne, Kohn Juliane, Ballaschk Katja, Esser Günter
Lehrstuhl für Klinische Psychologie/Psychotherapie, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2009 Nov;37(6):499-510; quiz 511-2. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917.37.6.499.
Referring to the prevalence rates of learning disorders in the research literature, the numbers of mathematics disorder and reading/spelling disorder are often reported to be identical. However, the correlation between intelligence level and reading/spelling skills is much weaker than between intelligence and arithmetic skills. If the same definition criterion is applied to both disorders, a lower prevalence rate for mathematics disorder should be expected.
Are there differences in the prevalence estimates for learning disorders depending on the definition criterion?
A large representative sample of German students (N=1970) was used to review the hypothesis.
Depending on the definition criterion, we could show a prevalence range of mathematics disorder between 0.1% and 8.1% in the same sample. Using the same definition criterion for both learning disorders, there are two to three times as many students with reading/spelling disorder than those with mathematics disorder.
Whenever children with reading/spelling disorder are compared to children with mathematics disorder, the same definition criterion has to be applied.
参考研究文献中学习障碍的患病率,数学障碍和阅读/拼写障碍的人数通常被报道为相同。然而,智力水平与阅读/拼写技能之间的相关性远弱于智力与算术技能之间的相关性。如果对这两种障碍应用相同的定义标准,那么数学障碍的患病率应该更低。
根据定义标准,学习障碍患病率估计是否存在差异?
使用一大组具有代表性的德国学生样本(N = 1970)来检验该假设。
根据定义标准,我们发现在同一个样本中,数学障碍的患病率范围在0.1%至8.1%之间。对两种学习障碍使用相同的定义标准时,患有阅读/拼写障碍的学生人数是患有数学障碍学生人数的两到三倍。
每当将患有阅读/拼写障碍的儿童与患有数学障碍的儿童进行比较时,都必须应用相同的定义标准。