• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腭部种植体在正畸负荷下位置是否保持稳定?一项临床放射学研究。

Do palatal implants remain positionally stable under orthodontic load? A clinical radiologic study.

作者信息

Wehrbein Heinrich, Göllner Peter

机构信息

Orthodontic Clinic, University Hospital, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):695-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.050.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.050
PMID:19892287
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the positional stability and success rate of palatally placed length-reduced temporary anchorage devices (LRTADs) (length, 4 or 6 mm).

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (ages, 21-62 years; 14 women, 8 men) were enrolled in the study. Each received 1 LRTAD (Orthosystem, Straumann, Switzerland) placed in the midsagittal palate for multifunctional anchorage tasks. Standardized cephalograms were taken directly after implant placement and at the end of treatment to analyze any implant movements. The cephalometric tracings were superimposed on anterior nasal spine to posterior nasal spine in posterior nasal spine to analyze changes in implant angulation and position during treatment. The LRTADs were also evaluated clinically for mobility.

RESULTS

Two of 22 implants showed mobility during the healing period (first 10-12 weeks after placement). Thus, the success rate was 91%. The remaining 20 palatally placed LRTADs had no mobility during healing (10-12 weeks) or the loading period (18 months 1 week) and were evaluated radiographically. The mean differences between the initial and final cephalometric evaluations (n = 20) were 0.5 degrees for changes in implant angulation and -0.6 mm for changes in implant position. These changes were most likely due to inaccuracies in cephalometric landmark identification rather than to LRTAD movements because no mobility was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

One palatally placed LRTAD was sufficient for multifunctional stationary anchorage tasks in the maxilla under clinical loading conditions. The success rate was 91%. Implant loss occurred during the healing period.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是确定腭部放置的长度缩短型临时锚固装置(LRTADs)(长度为4或6毫米)的位置稳定性和成功率。

方法

22名患者(年龄21 - 62岁;女性14名,男性8名)纳入本研究。每位患者接受1枚放置于腭中缝的LRTAD(瑞士士卓曼公司的Orthosystem),用于多功能锚固任务。在种植体植入后及治疗结束时直接拍摄标准化头颅侧位片,以分析种植体的任何移动情况。将头颅侧位片描图叠加于后鼻棘的前鼻棘至后鼻棘上,以分析治疗期间种植体角度和位置的变化。还对LRTADs进行临床松动度评估。

结果

22枚种植体中有2枚在愈合期(植入后最初10 - 12周)出现松动。因此,成功率为91%。其余20枚腭部放置的LRTADs在愈合期(10 - 12周)或加载期(18个月1周)均无松动,并进行了影像学评估。20例患者头颅侧位测量初始与最终评估的平均差异为:种植体角度变化0.5度,种植体位置变化 - 0.6毫米。这些变化很可能是由于头颅侧位标志点识别不准确,而非LRTAD移动,因为未记录到松动情况。

结论

在临床加载条件下,一枚腭部放置的LRTAD足以满足上颌骨多功能固定锚固任务。成功率为91%。种植体在愈合期出现丢失。

相似文献

1
Do palatal implants remain positionally stable under orthodontic load? A clinical radiologic study.腭部种植体在正畸负荷下位置是否保持稳定?一项临床放射学研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):695-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.050.
2
Loss of anchorage of miniscrews: a 3-dimensional assessment.微型螺钉支抗丧失:三维评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):700-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.059.
3
Immediate versus conventional loading of palatal implants in humans: a first report of a multicenter RCT.即刻负载与传统负载方式在下颌种植体的临床效果比较:一项多中心 RCT 的初步报告。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Aug;15(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0407-9. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
4
A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.延迟加载与即刻加载的正畸腭部种植体稳定性比较
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(3):174-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00174.x.
5
Success rate of second-generation palatal implants.第二代腭部植入物的成功率。
Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):85-90. doi: 10.2319/010708-8.1.
6
Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage in initial orthodontic retraction.微型种植体支抗在正畸初始内收中的临床应用
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Feb;41(1):77-84. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00227. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Orthodontic load on short maxillary implants with reduced sink depth: an experimental study.短种植体下沉深度降低时上颌种植体正畸负荷的实验研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):1063-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01558.x.
8
Molar intrusion with implants using a bite plane appliance: a case report.磨牙植入物推进术:病例报告。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):48-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00129.x. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
9
Clinical observations and success rates of palatal implants.腭部种植体的临床观察和成功率。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.022.
10
Bone-to-implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans--a histomorphometric investigation.人类正畸种植体的骨与种植体接触——一项组织形态计量学研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):552-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn054.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone remodelling patterns around orthodontic mini-implants migrating in bone: an experimental study in rat vertebrae.正畸微种植体在骨内迁移时周围骨改建模式:大鼠椎骨的实验研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2021 Dec 1;43(6):708-717. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab065.
2
Additional intraoral radiographs may change the judgment regarding the final position of orthodontic mini-implants.额外的口腔内X光片可能会改变关于正畸微型种植体最终位置的判断。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):54-61. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.2.054-061.oar.
3
Do sand blasted with large grit and acid etched surface treated mini-implants remain stationary under orthodontic forces?
喷砂酸蚀表面处理的微型种植体在正畸力作用下是否保持稳定?
Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):304-12. doi: 10.2319/032511-212.1. Epub 2011 Aug 10.