Averkamp Benjamin, Yu Ziqing, Mastracci Julia C, Braswell Matthew J, Chen Andrew T, Lopas Luke A, Sharma Ishani, Farooq Hassan, Mir Hassan, Rivera Jessica, Seymour Rachel B, Hsu Joseph R
Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC.
UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
OTA Int. 2025 Mar 7;8(2):e387. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000387. eCollection 2025 Jun.
To evaluate rates of nonunion repair, osseous healing, and outcomes in femoral nonunions with contemporary healing.
Retrospective review.
Five academic level 1 trauma centers.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: This study includes adult patients (age older than 18) seen at one of the participating institutions between 2012 and 2019 who sustained a femur fracture (OTA/AO 31, 32, 33) initially treated with intramedullary fixation that developed nonunion and were treated with exchange nailing for the index nonunion surgery. Seventy-nine patients with femoral nonunion met inclusion criteria.
Exchange nailing for treatment of femoral nonunion.
The primary outcome measure was radiographic osseous union. We further analyzed union rates by OTA/AO classification, nonunion type, implants used, graft used, time from the initial procedure, and infection status.
Seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Rates of osseous union were similar by OTA/AO classification ( = 0.48), nonunion type (hypertrophic, oligotrophic, atrophic) ( = 0.52), implant/biologic used ( = 0.45), and time from the initial procedure until exchange nail procedure ( = 0.09). Forty-two patients had inflammatory laboratory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentary rate) and cultures obtained during the first nonunion surgery with no significant differences in union ( = 0.29) based on laboratory and culture results. However, a considerable number of complications were encountered (n = 32; 41%). Common complications included reoperation (n = 30; 38%) secondary to recalcitrant nonunion, readmission, implant failure, and infection.
This large, multicenter study with modern implants, instruments, and techniques for exchange nailing of femoral nonunions demonstrates high rates of reoperation (n = 30; 38%), but higher rates of osseous healing (n = 68; 86% healed) than previously reported data in the literature.
III.
评估当代治疗方法下股骨骨不连的愈合率、骨愈合情况及治疗结果。
回顾性研究。
五家一级学术创伤中心。
患者/参与者:本研究纳入了2012年至2019年间在其中一家参与机构就诊的成年患者(年龄大于18岁),这些患者股骨骨折(OTA/AO 31、32、33),最初采用髓内固定治疗,随后发生骨不连,并接受了翻修交锁髓内钉手术治疗。79例股骨骨不连患者符合纳入标准。
采用翻修交锁髓内钉治疗股骨骨不连。
主要观察指标为影像学骨愈合。我们还根据OTA/AO分类、骨不连类型、使用的植入物、使用的植骨、初次手术时间及感染情况进一步分析了愈合率。
79例患者符合纳入标准。OTA/AO分类(P = 0.48)、骨不连类型(肥大性、营养不良性、萎缩性)(P = 0.52)、使用的植入物/生物材料(P = 0.45)以及初次手术至翻修交锁髓内钉手术的时间(P = 0.09)对骨愈合率的影响相似。42例患者在首次骨不连手术时检测了炎症实验室指标(C反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率)并进行了培养,根据实验室及培养结果,骨愈合情况无显著差异(P = 0.29)。然而,出现了相当数量的并发症(n = 32;41%)。常见并发症包括因顽固性骨不连、再次入院、植入物失败及感染而再次手术(n = 30;38%)。
这项采用现代植入物、器械及技术对股骨骨不连进行翻修交锁髓内钉治疗的大型多中心研究显示,再次手术率较高(n = 30;38%),但骨愈合率(n = 68;86%愈合)高于文献中先前报道的数据。
III级。