• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1997年至2006年期间,在美国急诊科就诊且在建议分诊时间内得到诊治的患者百分比。

Percentage of US emergency department patients seen within the recommended triage time: 1997 to 2006.

作者信息

Horwitz Leora I, Bradley Elizabeth H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208093, New Haven, CT 06520-8093, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1857-65. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.336.

DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.336
PMID:19901137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2811414/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The wait time to see a physician in US emergency departments (EDs) is increasing and may differentially affect patients with varied insurance status and racial/ethnic backgrounds.

METHODS

Using a stratified random sampling of 151 999 visits, representing 539 million ED visits from 1997 to 2006, we examined trends in the percentage of patients seen within the triage target time by triage category (emergent, urgent, semiurgent, and nonurgent), payer type, and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients seen within the triage target time declined a mean of 0.8% per year, from 80.0% in 1997 to 75.9% in 2006 (P < .001). The percentage of patients seen within the triage target time declined 2.3% per year for emergent patients (59.2% to 48.0%; P < .001) compared with 0.7% per year for semiurgent patients (90.6% to 84.7%; P < .001). In 2006, the adjusted odds of being seen within the triage target time were 30% lower than in 1997 (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.89). The adjusted odds of being seen within the triage target time were 87% lower (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.15) for emergent patients compared with semiurgent patients. Patients of each payment type experienced similar decreases in the percentage seen within the triage target over time (P for interaction = .24), as did patients of each racial/ethnic group (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of patients in the ED who are seen by a physician within the time recommended at triage has been steadily declining and is at its lowest point in at least 10 years. Of all patients in the ED, the most emergent are the least likely to be seen within the triage target time. Patients of all racial/ethnic backgrounds and payer types have been similarly affected.

摘要

背景

在美国急诊科就诊时等待看医生的时间正在增加,这可能对具有不同保险状况和种族/族裔背景的患者产生不同影响。

方法

我们采用分层随机抽样法,抽取了151999次就诊病例,代表了1997年至2006年期间的5.39亿次急诊科就诊情况,我们按分诊类别(紧急、加急、半紧急和非紧急)、付款人类型和种族/族裔,研究了在分诊目标时间内就诊的患者百分比的趋势。

结果

在分诊目标时间内就诊的患者百分比平均每年下降0.8%,从1997年的80.0%降至2006年的75.9%(P <.001)。紧急患者在分诊目标时间内就诊的百分比每年下降2.3%(从59.2%降至48.0%;P <.001),而半紧急患者为每年下降0.7%(从90.6%降至84.7%;P <.001)。2006年,在分诊目标时间内就诊的调整后几率比1997年低30%(优势比,0.70;95%置信区间,0.55 - 0.89)。与半紧急患者相比,紧急患者在分诊目标时间内就诊的调整后几率低87%(优势比,0.13;95%置信区间,0.11 - 0.15)。随着时间的推移,每种付款类型的患者在分诊目标时间内就诊的百分比下降情况相似(交互作用P值 =.24),各种族/族裔组的患者也是如此(P =.05)。

结论

在急诊科中,在分诊建议时间内由医生诊治的患者百分比一直在稳步下降,且处于至少10年来的最低点。在所有急诊科患者中,最紧急的患者在分诊目标时间内就诊的可能性最小。所有种族/族裔背景和付款人类型的患者都受到了类似影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8d9/2811414/6667b1db3b2c/nihms-152783-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8d9/2811414/02e2c730be56/nihms-152783-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8d9/2811414/d729b6f0c363/nihms-152783-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8d9/2811414/6667b1db3b2c/nihms-152783-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8d9/2811414/02e2c730be56/nihms-152783-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8d9/2811414/d729b6f0c363/nihms-152783-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8d9/2811414/6667b1db3b2c/nihms-152783-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Percentage of US emergency department patients seen within the recommended triage time: 1997 to 2006.1997年至2006年期间,在美国急诊科就诊且在建议分诊时间内得到诊治的患者百分比。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1857-65. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.336.
2
Disparities in emergency department wait times for acute gastrointestinal illnesses: results from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1997-2006.急性胃肠疾病患者在急诊科候诊时间的差异:1997 - 2006年美国国家医院门诊医疗调查结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1668-73. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.189. Epub 2009 May 12.
3
Changes in insurance status and emergency department visits after the 2008 economic downturn.2008年经济衰退后保险状况及急诊科就诊情况的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/acem.12553. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
4
Racial and ethnic variations in waiting times for emergency department visits related to nontraumatic dental conditions in the United States.美国非创伤性牙科急诊就诊等候时间的种族和民族差异。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jul;144(7):828-36. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0195.
5
Emergency department volume and racial and ethnic differences in waiting times in the United States.美国急诊部门就诊量与等候时间的种族差异
Med Care. 2012 Apr;50(4):335-41. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a53c.
6
The complex association of race and leaving the pediatric emergency department without being seen by a physician.种族与未经医生诊治便离开儿科急诊科之间的复杂关联。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Nov;28(11):1136-45. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827134db.
7
Patients who leave Emergency Department without being seen or during treatment in the Lazio Region (Central Italy): Determinants and short term outcomes.在拉齐奥地区(意大利中部),未被诊治或在治疗过程中离开急诊部的患者:决定因素和短期结局。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208914. eCollection 2018.
8
Bronchiolitis in US emergency departments 1992 to 2000: epidemiology and practice variation.1992年至2000年美国急诊科的细支气管炎:流行病学与实践差异
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005 Apr;21(4):242-7. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000161469.19841.86.
9
Patient sex, racial and ethnic disparities in emergency department triage: A multi-site retrospective study.患者性别、急诊分诊中的种族和民族差异:一项多地点回顾性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;76:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.008. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
10
US emergency department performance on wait time and length of visit.美国急诊部门在等待时间和就诊时长方面的表现。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;55(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.07.023. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Ochsner Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (OEDOCS): predicting Emergency Department crowding among diverse academic hospital settings.奥克施纳急诊科拥挤程度量表(OEDOCS):预测不同学术医院环境下的急诊科拥挤情况。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:42-51. eCollection 2023.
2
The Association Between Age and Admission to an Inappropriate Ward: A Cross-Sectional Survey in France.年龄与入住不适当病房之间的关联:法国的一项横断面调查。
Health Serv Insights. 2023 May 13;16:11786329231174340. doi: 10.1177/11786329231174340. eCollection 2023.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of direct admission to acute geriatric unit versus admission after an emergency department visit for elderly patients.

本文引用的文献

1
The association between emergency department crowding and analgesia administration in acute abdominal pain patients.急诊科拥挤与急性腹痛患者镇痛药物使用之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):603-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00441.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
2
The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain.急诊科拥挤与胸痛患者不良心血管结局之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):617-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00456.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
3
Increasing length of stay among adult visits to U.S. Emergency departments, 2001-2005.
老年患者直接收入急性老年病房与急诊就诊后收入的成本效果分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 10;23(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03985-0.
4
Using Queue Theory and Load-Leveling Principles to Identify a Simple Metric for Resource Planning in a Pediatric Emergency Department.运用排队论和负载均衡原则确定儿科急诊科资源规划的一个简单指标。
Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 Jan 24;8:2333794X20944665. doi: 10.1177/2333794X20944665. eCollection 2021.
5
Effectiveness of hospital emergency department regionalization and categorization policy on appropriate patient emergency care use: a nationwide observational study in Taiwan.医院急诊科区域化和分类政策对适当的急诊患者护理利用的效果:台湾的一项全国性观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06006-7.
6
Decreasing triage time: effects of implementing a step-wise ESI algorithm in an EHR.缩短分诊时间:在电子健康记录中实施逐步紧急严重程度指数(ESI)算法的效果
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Jun 1;30(5):375-381. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy056.
7
Effect of emergency physician burnout on patient waiting times.急诊医师职业倦怠对患者候诊时间的影响。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;13(3):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1706-9. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
8
Predictors for Delayed Emergency Department Care in Medical Patients with Acute Infections - An International Prospective Observational Study.急性感染内科患者急诊科延迟护理的预测因素——一项国际前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155363. eCollection 2016.
9
Health outcomes in US children with abdominal pain at major emergency departments associated with race and socioeconomic status.美国主要急诊科中腹痛儿童的健康状况与种族和社会经济地位的关系。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0132758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132758. eCollection 2015.
10
Waiting for triage: unmeasured time in patient flow.等待分诊:患者流程中未计量的时间。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):39-42. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.11.22824. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
2001 - 2005年美国急诊科成人就诊患者住院时间的增加情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):609-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00428.x. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
4
Reliability and validity of two four-level emergency triage systems.两种四级紧急分诊系统的可靠性和有效性
Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(3):115-20. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328310b594.
5
Racial disparities in emergency department length of stay for admitted patients in the United States.美国住院患者在急诊科停留时间的种族差异。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 May;16(5):403-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00381.x. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
6
The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients.急诊科拥挤对住院患者满意度的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;15(9):825-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00200.x.
7
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2006年急诊科总结
Natl Health Stat Report. 2008 Aug 6(7):1-38.
8
Uninsured adults presenting to US emergency departments: assumptions vs data.前往美国急诊科的未参保成年人:假设与数据
JAMA. 2008 Oct 22;300(16):1914-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.16.1914.
9
Emergency department admissions are more profitable than non-emergency department admissions.急诊科收治的患者比非急诊科收治的患者利润更高。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;53(2):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
10
Triage presenting complaint descriptions bias emergency department waiting times.分诊时对主诉的描述会影响急诊科的候诊时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;15(8):731-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00177.x. Epub 2008 Jul 11.