Diehm Curt, Allenberg Jens Rainer, Pittrow David, Mahn Matthias, Tepohl Gerhart, Haberl Roman L, Darius Harald, Burghaus Ina, Trampisch Hans Joachim
Department of Internal Medicine/Vascular Medicine, SRH-Klinikum Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, Affiliated Teaching Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Guttmannstr 1, D-76307 Karlsbad, Germany.
Circulation. 2009 Nov 24;120(21):2053-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.865600. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
Our aim was to assess the mortality and vascular morbidity risk of elderly individuals with asymptomatic versus symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the primary care setting.
This prospective cohort study included 6880 representative unselected patients >or=65 years of age with monitored follow-up over 5 years. According to physician diagnosis, 5392 patients had no PAD, 836 had asymptomatic PAD (ankle brachial index <0.9 without symptoms), and 593 had symptomatic PAD (lower-extremity peripheral revascularization, amputation as a result of PAD, or intermittent claudication symptoms regardless of ankle brachial index). The risk of symptomatic compared with asymptomatic PAD patients was significantly increased for the composite of all-cause death or severe vascular event (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, carotid revascularization, or lower-extremity peripheral vascular events; hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 1.80) but not for all-cause death alone (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.43), all-cause death/myocardial infarction/stroke (excluding lower-extremity peripheral vascular events and any revascularizations; hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.52), cardiovascular events alone (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.60), or cerebrovascular events alone (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 2.20). Lower ankle brachial index categories were associated with increased risk. PAD was a strong factor for the prediction of the composite end point in an adjusted model.
Asymptomatic PAD diagnosed through routine screening in the offices of primary care physicians carries a high mortality and/or vascular event risk. Notably, the risk of mortality was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with PAD and was significantly higher than in those without PAD. In the primary care setting, the diagnosis of PAD has important prognostic value.
我们的目的是评估在初级保健机构中,无症状与有症状的外周动脉疾病(PAD)老年个体的死亡率和血管疾病发病风险。
这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了6880名年龄≥65岁的具有代表性的未经选择的患者,并进行了为期5年的随访监测。根据医生诊断,5392名患者无PAD,836名有无症状PAD(踝臂指数<0.9且无症状),593名有症状PAD(下肢外周血管重建、因PAD导致的截肢或间歇性跛行症状,无论踝臂指数如何)。与无症状PAD患者相比,有症状PAD患者发生全因死亡或严重血管事件(心肌梗死、冠状动脉血管重建、中风、颈动脉血管重建或下肢外周血管事件)的复合风险显著增加(风险比,1.48;95%置信区间,1.21至1.80),但单独全因死亡风险未增加(风险比,1.13;95%置信区间,0.89至1.43),全因死亡/心肌梗死/中风(不包括下肢外周血管事件和任何血管重建;风险比,1.18;95%置信区间,0.92至1.52),单独心血管事件(风险比,1.20;95%置信区间,0.89至1.60),或单独脑血管事件(风险比,1.33;95%置信区间,0.80至2.20)。较低的踝臂指数类别与风险增加相关。在调整模型中,PAD是预测复合终点的一个强因素。
在初级保健医生办公室通过常规筛查诊断出的无症状PAD具有较高的死亡率和/或血管事件风险。值得注意的是,有症状和无症状PAD患者的死亡风险相似,且显著高于无PAD患者。在初级保健机构中,PAD的诊断具有重要的预后价值。