Weinberg Jordan A, Griffin Russell L, Vandromme Marianne J, Melton Sherry M, George Richard L, Reiff Donald A, Kerby Jeffrey D, Rue Loring W
Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0007, USA.
J Trauma. 2009 Nov;67(5):929-35. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181991ab0.
Although colon wounds are commonly treated in the setting of damage control laparotomy (DCL), a paucity of data exist to guide management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience with the management of colonic wounds in the context of DCL, using colonic wound outcomes after routine, single laparotomy (SL) as a benchmark.
Consecutive patients during a 7-year period with full-thickness or devitalizing colon injury were identified. Early deaths (<48 hour) were excluded. Colon-related complications (abscess, suture or staple leak, and stomal ischemia) were compared between those managed in the setting of DCL versus those managed by SL, both overall and as stratified by procedure (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, and resection and colostomy).
One hundred fifty-seven patients met study criteria: 101 had undergone SL and 56 had undergone DCL. Comparison of DCL patients with SL patients was notable for a significant difference in colon-related complications (30% vs. 12%, p < 0.005) and suture/staple leak in particular (12% vs. 3%, p < 0.05). Stratification by procedure revealed a significant difference in colon-related complications among those that underwent resection and anastomosis (DCL: 39% vs. SL: 18%, p < 0.05), whereas no differences were observed in those who underwent primary repair or resection and colostomy.
Management of colonic wounds in the setting of DCL is associated with a relatively high incidence of complications. The excessive incidence of leak overall and morbidity particular to resection and anastomosis, however, give us pause. Although stoma construction is not without its own complications in the setting of DCL, it may be the safer alternative.
尽管结肠伤口常在损伤控制剖腹术(DCL)的情况下进行处理,但指导管理的数据却很匮乏。本研究的目的是在DCL的背景下评估我们处理结肠伤口的经验,将常规单次剖腹术(SL)后的结肠伤口结果作为基准。
确定了7年间患有全层或失活结肠损伤的连续患者。排除早期死亡(<48小时)的患者。比较了在DCL情况下处理的患者与通过SL处理的患者之间的结肠相关并发症(脓肿、缝线或吻合钉渗漏以及造口缺血),总体比较以及按手术方式(一期修复、切除吻合和切除结肠造口术)分层比较。
157例患者符合研究标准:101例接受了SL,56例接受了DCL。DCL患者与SL患者的比较显示,结肠相关并发症存在显著差异(30%对12%,p<0.005),尤其是缝线/吻合钉渗漏(12%对3%,p<0.05)。按手术方式分层显示,接受切除吻合的患者中结肠相关并发症存在显著差异(DCL:39%对SL:18%,p<0.05),而接受一期修复或切除结肠造口术的患者中未观察到差异。
在DCL情况下处理结肠伤口与相对较高的并发症发生率相关。然而,总体渗漏发生率过高以及切除吻合术特有的发病率让我们有所顾虑。尽管在DCL情况下造口构建并非没有其自身的并发症,但它可能是更安全的选择。