Ragni Marco, Löffler Christoph M
Center for Cognitive Science, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Friedrichstr. 50, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Cogn Process. 2010 May;11(2):159-70. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0344-1. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Attacks on classic complex problem solving focus on both their ecological validity and the difficulty to analyze such a complex interplay of system variables. But we argue that the domain of travel planning is in some sense a much more "natural" domain and at least partially able to deal with this kind of criticism. We first review the main existing scenarios and paradigms like Lohhausen, Tailorshop, and Moro and compare them to what we call the TRAVELPLAN problem. This problem contains a number of computationally well-investigated problems, which are worked out and can be described by so-called constrained satisfaction problems. The formal investigations have led to the development of a computational architecture which is able to deal with these kinds of subproblems simultaneously. More important, however, is that it serves as a basis for developing experiments and particularly to determine aspects of the computational complexity of the main problem. This in turn allows us to specify and to formulate experimental ideas. Finally, the status quo of ongoing experiments is briefly presented.
对经典复杂问题解决的攻击既关注其生态效度,也关注分析系统变量如此复杂的相互作用的难度。但我们认为,旅行规划领域在某种意义上是一个更“自然”的领域,并且至少部分能够应对这类批评。我们首先回顾现有的主要场景和范式,如洛豪森、裁缝店和莫罗,并将它们与我们所称的旅行计划问题进行比较。这个问题包含一些经过充分计算研究的问题,这些问题已经得到解决,并且可以用所谓的约束满足问题来描述。形式化研究导致了一种计算架构的发展,这种架构能够同时处理这类子问题。然而,更重要的是,它为开展实验,特别是确定主要问题的计算复杂性方面提供了基础。这反过来又使我们能够明确并阐述实验思路。最后,简要介绍正在进行的实验的现状。