• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规行为有计划性吗? 汉诺塔任务中的选择性注意表现模型。

How planful is routine behavior? A selective-attention model of performance in the Tower of Hanoi.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Feb;139(1):95-116. doi: 10.1037/a0018268.

DOI:10.1037/a0018268
PMID:20121314
Abstract

Routine human behavior has often been attributed to plans-mental representations of sequences goals and actions-but can also be attributed to more opportunistic interactions of mind and a structured environment. This study asks whether performance on a task traditionally analyzed in terms of plans can be better understood from a "situated" (or "embodied") perspective. A saccade-contingent display-updating paradigm is used to change the environment by adding, deleting, and moving task-relevant objects without participants' direct awareness. Response latencies, action patterns, and eye movements all indicate that performance is guided not by plans stored in memory but by a control routine bound to objects as needed by perception and selective attention. The results have implications for interpreting everyday task performance and particular neuropsychological deficits.

摘要

日常行为通常归因于计划——心理对序列、目标和动作的表示——但也可以归因于思维和结构化环境的更具机会性的相互作用。本研究询问在传统上根据计划进行分析的任务中,是否可以从“情境”(或“体现”)的角度更好地理解表现。使用眼跳 contingent 显示更新范式来改变环境,在参与者没有直接意识的情况下添加、删除和移动与任务相关的对象。响应潜伏期、动作模式和眼动都表明,表现不是由存储在记忆中的计划指导的,而是由根据感知和选择性注意的需要绑定到对象的控制例程指导的。结果对解释日常任务表现和特定神经心理缺陷具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
How planful is routine behavior? A selective-attention model of performance in the Tower of Hanoi.常规行为有计划性吗? 汉诺塔任务中的选择性注意表现模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Feb;139(1):95-116. doi: 10.1037/a0018268.
2
Covert shifts of attention function as an implicit aid to insight.注意力的隐蔽转移作为对洞察力的一种隐性辅助发挥作用。
Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
3
Cognitive processes in the development of TOL performance.耐受表现发展中的认知过程。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
4
Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.关联性知识控制视觉选择性注意的部署。
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Feb;6(2):182-9. doi: 10.1038/nn996.
5
Asymmetric learning transfer between imagined viewer- and object-rotations: evidence of a hierarchical organization of spatial reference frames.想象的观察者旋转与物体旋转之间的不对称学习迁移:空间参照系层次组织的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
6
Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.儿童和成人的混合正扫视和反扫视表现。
Brain Res. 2009 Feb 19;1255:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.006. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
7
Eye movements and visuospatial problem solving: identifying separable phases of complex cognition.眼球运动与视觉空间问题解决:识别复杂认知的可分离阶段。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Jul;46(4):818-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00821.x. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
8
Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention.感知数字会引起注意力的空间转移。
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jun;6(6):555-6. doi: 10.1038/nn1066.
9
Cognitive task fulfilment may decrease gaze control performances.执行认知任务可能会降低注视控制能力。
Physiol Behav. 2007 Dec 5;92(5):861-6. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
10
The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.选择性注意在匹配观察到的和执行的动作中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):786-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.008. Epub 2008 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impacts of Three Educational Technologies on Algebraic Understanding in the Context of COVID-19.新冠疫情背景下三种教育技术对代数理解的影响
AERA Open. 2023 Apr 21;9:23328584231165919. doi: 10.1177/23328584231165919. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Knowledge Representations: Individual Differences in Novel Problem Solving.知识表征:新颖问题解决中的个体差异。
J Intell. 2023 Apr 21;11(4):77. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040077.
3
The developmental trajectories of executive function from adolescence to old age.执行功能从青少年到老年的发展轨迹。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80866-1.
4
Task-Irrelevant Expectation Violations in Sequential Manual Actions: Evidence for a "Check-after-Surprise" Mode of Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Decoupling.连续手动动作中与任务无关的期望违反:视觉注意“惊讶后检查”模式和眼手解耦的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 23;7:1845. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01845. eCollection 2016.
5
Gesturing during mental problem solving reduces eye movements, especially for individuals with lower visual working memory capacity.在解决心理问题时做手势会减少眼球运动,尤其是对于视觉工作记忆容量较低的个体。
Cogn Process. 2016 Aug;17(3):269-77. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0757-6. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Learning to explore the structure of kinematic objects in a virtual environment.学习在虚拟环境中探索运动物体的结构。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 7;6:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00374. eCollection 2015.
7
The role of placekeeping ability in fluid intelligence.空间定位能力在流体智力中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1104-10. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0764-5.
8
A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual world studies.视觉世界研究中基于目标的眼动视角。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Nov 10.