• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“如果”与条件推理的问题。

'If' and the problems of conditional reasoning.

作者信息

Byrne Ruth M J, Johnson-Laird P N

机构信息

School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):282-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.003
PMID:19540792
Abstract

'If' is a puzzle. No consensus has existed about its meaning for over two thousand years. Here, we show how the main psychological theories deal with the seven crucial problems that it raises. These competing explanations treat 'if' as though it was a term in a formal logic, or as eliciting the construction of a mental model of the world, or as an instruction to suppose that a proposition holds. The solution to 'if' would be a major step towards understanding how people reason, and towards implementing a computer program that can reason in a human way. We argue that the mental model theory is closer to resolving the puzzle of 'if' than its competitors.

摘要

“如果”是一个谜题。两千多年来,人们对其含义一直没有达成共识。在此,我们展示了主要的心理学理论如何处理它所引发的七个关键问题。这些相互竞争的解释将“如果”视为形式逻辑中的一个术语,或者视为引发对世界心理模型的构建,或者视为一种假设某个命题成立的指令。解决“如果”问题将是朝着理解人们如何推理以及实现能够以人类方式进行推理的计算机程序迈出的重要一步。我们认为,心理模型理论比其竞争对手更接近解决“如果”之谜。

相似文献

1
'If' and the problems of conditional reasoning.“如果”与条件推理的问题。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):282-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
2
Indicative and counterfactual 'only if' conditionals.指示性和反事实的“仅当”条件句。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):240-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
3
The conceptual underpinnings of pretense: pretending is not 'behaving-as-if'.假装的概念基础:假装并非“表现得好像”。
Cognition. 2007 Oct;105(1):103-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
4
Allocation and 'what-if' scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems.废物管理系统生命周期评估中的分配与“假设分析”情景
Waste Manag. 2007;27(8):997-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.013. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
5
Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories.基于条件句的推理:对四种理论的形式模型的检验
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Nov;53(3):238-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 May 26.
6
Why does placing the question before an arithmetic word problem improve performance? A situation model account.为什么在算术应用题之前提出问题能提高解题表现?一种情境模型解释。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jan;60(1):43-56. doi: 10.1080/17470210600587927.
7
Mental models and logical reasoning problems in the GRE.研究生入学考试(GRE)中的心理模型与逻辑推理问题。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2001 Dec;7(4):308-16.
8
Reasoning from inconsistency to consistency.从不一致推理到一致。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):640-61. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.640.
9
Self creation and the limitless void of dissociation: the 'as if' personality.自我创造与解离的无限虚空:“仿佛”人格。
J Anal Psychol. 2004 Nov;49(5):635-56. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8774.2004.00493.x.
10
Semantics Processing of Conditional Connectives: German wenn 'if' Versus nur wenn 'only if'.条件连接词的语义处理:德语中的 wenn“如果”与 nur wenn“只有当”。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Dec;50(6):1337-1368. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09812-0. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of memory in affirming-the-consequent fallacy.记忆在肯定后件式谬误中的作用。
iScience. 2025 Jan 25;28(2):111889. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111889. eCollection 2025 Feb 21.
2
Scientific counterfactuals as make-believe.作为虚构的科学反事实陈述。
Synthese. 2022;200(6):473. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03949-8. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Episodic representation: A mental models account.情景表征:一种心智模型解释。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:899371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899371. eCollection 2022.
4
A Study on the Sufficient Conditional and the Necessary Conditional With Chinese and French Participants.一项针对中国和法国参与者的充分条件与必要条件的研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:787588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787588. eCollection 2022.
5
On the learning difficulty of visual and auditory modal concepts: Evidence for a single processing system.关于视觉和听觉模态概念的学习难度:单一加工系统的证据。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0840-7. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
6
Arguments from Developmental Order.来自发育顺序的论据。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 20;7:751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00751. eCollection 2016.
7
Bayesian reasoning with ifs and ands and ors.贝叶斯推理与条件句、合取和析取。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 25;6:192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00192. eCollection 2015.
8
Human creativity, evolutionary algorithms, and predictive representations: The mechanics of thought trials.人类创造力、进化算法与预测性表征:思维试验的机制
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):897-915. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0743-x.
9
Causal conditionals and counterfactuals.因果条件句与反事实条件句。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Sep;141(1):54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
10
The consistency of disjunctive assertions.析取断言的一致性。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):769-78. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0188-2.