• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带有正畸托槽聚类观察的生存分析。

Survival analysis with clustered observations of orthodontic brackets.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry Giulio A. Maccacaro, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2009 Dec 10;28(28):3483-91. doi: 10.1002/sim.3641.

DOI:10.1002/sim.3641
PMID:19902496
Abstract

Failures in the bonding of dental bracket are a big concern for orthodontists. Clinical experience suggests that some patients are more prone than others to experience failures. Therefore, it can be expected that in statistical analysis of orthodontic bracket failures, the usual assumption of independence between the observations is violated. An approach to overcome this problem is to apply the frailty model, in which the association between failure times is modelled with a random-effect term (i.e. frailty). We postulated that brackets of the same subject share the same frailty, that is, a latent common group effect, due to some unknown or unobserved covariates.The aim of this study was to investigate possible risk factors related to bracket failure using Cox proportional hazards model with a shared frailty term and to compare the results with those obtained using a basic Cox proportional hazards model.Survival data for 1677 brackets were obtained from a cohort of 54 females (mean age +/- SD: 13.3+/-4.8 yrs) and 46 males (mean age +/-SD: 13.1+/-3.8 yrs) over a eight-year period. Age, gender, vertical craniofacial morphology and anatomical location of brackets were entered into Cox models as covariates. The findings indicated that bracket failure was significantly affected by tooth position within the dental arch, with the highest failure risk in maxillary posterior region. Age, gender and vertical craniofacial morphology did not affect bracket failure. A Cox proportional hazards model with a shared frailty term represents a useful approach for modelling orthodontic bracket failures.

摘要

正畸医生非常关注牙科托槽的粘结失败问题。临床经验表明,有些患者比其他患者更容易出现粘结失败。因此,可以预计在正畸托槽失败的统计分析中,通常假设观察结果之间是相互独立的,这一假设是不成立的。解决此问题的一种方法是应用脆弱性模型,该模型用随机效应项(即脆弱性)来模拟失败时间之间的关联。我们假设同一患者的托槽具有相同的脆弱性,即由于某些未知或未观察到的协变量,存在一个潜在的共同组效应。本研究旨在使用具有共享脆弱性项的 Cox 比例风险模型来研究与托槽失败相关的可能风险因素,并将结果与使用基本 Cox 比例风险模型获得的结果进行比较。在 8 年的时间里,从 54 名女性(平均年龄 +/- SD:13.3 +/- 4.8 岁)和 46 名男性(平均年龄 +/- SD:13.1 +/- 3.8 岁)的队列中获得了 1677 个托槽的生存数据。年龄、性别、垂直颅面形态和托槽的解剖位置作为协变量被纳入 Cox 模型。研究结果表明,托槽失败明显受到牙弓内牙齿位置的影响,上颌后区的失败风险最高。年龄、性别和垂直颅面形态不影响托槽失败。具有共享脆弱性项的 Cox 比例风险模型是一种用于模拟正畸托槽失败的有用方法。

相似文献

1
Survival analysis with clustered observations of orthodontic brackets.带有正畸托槽聚类观察的生存分析。
Stat Med. 2009 Dec 10;28(28):3483-91. doi: 10.1002/sim.3641.
2
An 18-month clinical study of bond failures with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in orthodontic practice.正畸临床中树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结失败的18个月临床研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Oct;120(4):406-15. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.115931.
3
A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer.一项使用自酸蚀底漆研究粘结失败率的随机临床试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Oct;28(5):444-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl007. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
4
Six-month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self-etching primer.自酸蚀底漆的六个月托槽失败率评估
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):211-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm119. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
5
Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.使用Cox回归模型对聚类分组生存数据进行多水平建模:在抗逆转录病毒治疗牙齿修复中的应用
Stat Med. 2006 Feb 15;25(3):447-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.2235.
6
Light-emitting diode vs halogen light curing of orthodontic brackets: a 15-month clinical study of bond failures.发光二极管与卤素灯对正畸托槽的光固化:一项关于粘结失败的15个月临床研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):518-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.038.
7
Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial.自酸蚀底漆的粘结失败率:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.022.
8
Retrospective cohort study of the clinical performance of 1-stage dental implants.一期牙种植体临床表现的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):399-405.
9
A retrospective six-months clinical trial of adhesive precoated brackets and bonding system.一项关于预涂粘结托槽及粘结系统的六个月回顾性临床试验。
J Can Dent Assoc. 1997 Feb;63(2):101-3, 107.
10
Practice-based comparison of direct and indirect bonding.基于实践的直接粘结与间接粘结的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):738-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of intervention using a messaging app on compliance and duration of treatment in orthodontic patients.使用即时通讯应用程序进行干预对正畸患者治疗依从性和疗程的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):1849-1859. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1662-6. Epub 2015 Dec 2.