• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双倍剂量泮托拉唑可加速超重和肥胖的洛杉矶 A 和 B 级反流性食管炎患者的持续症状缓解。

Double-dosed pantoprazole accelerates the sustained symptomatic response in overweight and obese patients with reflux esophagitis in Los Angeles grades A and B.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;105(5):1046-52. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.632. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1038/ajg.2009.632
PMID:19904250
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Body mass index (BMI) in the range defined as overweight or obese adversely decreases the sustained symptomatic response (SSR) to proton pump inhibitors for patients with reflux esophagitis of Los Angeles grade A or B (RE-AB). We thus investigated whether double-dosed pantoprazole can accelerate SSR in such patients.

METHODS

A total of 200 overweight or obese patients with RE-AB were evenly randomized into a double-dosed group (receiving 8-week pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily) or a standard-dosed control group (receiving 8-week pantoprazole 40 mg per day and one blank tablet at night). In each patient, demographic factors and the genotype of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) were checked and defined as poor metabolizer (PM), or homologous extensive metabolizer (HomoEM), or heterologous extensive metabolizer (HeteroEM). The cumulative proportions of patients with SSR were compared during the 8-week period.

RESULTS

Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses disclosed that the rates of SSR were higher in the double-dosed group than in the standard-dosed group from week 4 (P=0.005) until week 8 (P=0.01). While using standard-dosed pantoprazole, PMs had better rates of SSR during the 8-week period than both HomoEMs and HeteroEMs (P<0.05). By using double-dosed pantoprazole, the cumulative rates of SSR were improved as early as week 4 for both HomoEMs and HeteroEMs (P<0.005, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

For RE-AB in overweight and obese patients, double-dosed pantoprazole effectively accelerates the SSR, especially for those with CYP2C19 genotypes as HeteroEM or HomoEM. Accordingly, it offers an earlier shift into on-demand pantoprazole for RE-AB patients with high BMI.

摘要

目的

体重指数(BMI)在超重或肥胖范围内,会降低洛杉矶 A 或 B 级(RE-AB)反流性食管炎患者对质子泵抑制剂的持续症状缓解(SSR)。因此,我们研究了双倍剂量泮托拉唑是否可以加速此类患者的 SSR。

方法

共有 200 名超重或肥胖的 RE-AB 患者被平均随机分为双剂量组(接受 8 周泮托拉唑 40mg,每日两次)或标准剂量对照组(接受 8 周泮托拉唑 40mg,每天一次,晚上一片空白片)。在每个患者中,检查并定义人口统计学因素和 S-美芬妥因 4'-羟化酶(CYP2C19)的基因型为 poor metabolizer(PM)、同源广泛代谢型(HomoEM)或异源广泛代谢型(HeteroEM)。比较 8 周期间 SSR 患者的累积比例。

结果

意向治疗和方案分析均显示,从第 4 周(P=0.005)直至第 8 周(P=0.01),双剂量组的 SSR 率高于标准剂量组。使用标准剂量泮托拉唑时,PM 在 8 周期间的 SSR 率优于 HomoEM 和 HeteroEM(P<0.05)。使用双倍剂量泮托拉唑,HomoEM 和 HeteroEM 的 SSR 累积率在第 4 周时就得到改善(P<0.005,对数秩检验)。

结论

对于超重和肥胖的 RE-AB 患者,双倍剂量泮托拉唑可有效加速 SSR,尤其是 CYP2C19 基因型为 HeteroEM 或 HomoEM 的患者。因此,它为 BMI 较高的 RE-AB 患者提供了更早转为按需泮托拉唑的治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Double-dosed pantoprazole accelerates the sustained symptomatic response in overweight and obese patients with reflux esophagitis in Los Angeles grades A and B.双倍剂量泮托拉唑可加速超重和肥胖的洛杉矶 A 和 B 级反流性食管炎患者的持续症状缓解。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;105(5):1046-52. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.632. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
2
CYP2C19 genotypes determine the efficacy of on-demand therapy of pantoprazole for reflux esophagitis as Los-Angeles grades C and D.CYP2C19 基因型决定按需治疗泮托拉唑反流性食管炎的疗效,洛杉矶 C 和 D 级。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jan;27(1):104-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06848.x.
3
The impact of body mass index on the application of on-demand therapy for Los Angeles grades A and B reflux esophagitis.体重指数对洛杉矶A级和B级反流性食管炎按需治疗应用的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Nov;102(11):2387-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01468.x.
4
Pantoprazole 40 mg is as effective as esomeprazole 40 mg to relieve symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease after 4 weeks of treatment and superior regarding the prevention of symptomatic relapse.泮托拉唑40毫克在治疗4周后缓解胃食管反流病症状方面与埃索美拉唑40毫克效果相当,且在预防症状复发方面更具优势。
Digestion. 2006;74(3-4):145-54. doi: 10.1159/000098792. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
5
Symptom relief in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, controlled comparison of pantoprazole and nizatidine in a mixed patient population with erosive esophagitis or endoscopy-negative reflux disease.胃食管反流病的症状缓解:泮托拉唑与尼扎替丁在患有糜烂性食管炎或内镜检查阴性反流病的混合患者群体中的随机对照比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;96(10):2849-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.4237_a.x.
6
Pantoprazole 40 mg is as effective as esomeprazole 40 mg to relieve symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease after 4 weeks of treatment and superior regarding the prevention of symptomatic relapse.泮托拉唑40毫克在治疗4周后缓解胃食管反流病症状方面与埃索美拉唑40毫克同样有效,且在预防症状复发方面更具优势。
Digestion. 2007;75 Suppl 1:69-78. doi: 10.1159/000101085. Epub 2007 May 4.
7
Body mass index can determine the healing of reflux esophagitis with Los Angeles Grades C and D by esomeprazole.体重指数可确定埃索美拉唑治疗洛杉矶分级为C级和D级的反流性食管炎的愈合情况。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Sep;103(9):2209-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01979.x. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
8
Intravenous proton pump inhibition utilization and prescribing patterns escalation: a comparison between early and current trends in use.静脉质子泵抑制剂的使用及处方模式升级:早期与当前使用趋势的比较
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jan;69(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.053. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
9
Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with erosive esophagitis is associated with rapid heartburn relief and lack of relapse after treatment with pantoprazole.糜烂性食管炎患者感染幽门螺杆菌与服用泮托拉唑治疗后烧心症状迅速缓解及无复发相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Mar;50(3):432-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-2453-8.
10
Oral pantoprazole for erosive esophagitis: a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Pantoprazole US GERD Study Group.口服泮托拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎:一项安慰剂对照的随机临床试验。泮托拉唑美国胃食管反流病研究组
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;95(11):3071-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03254.x.

引用本文的文献

1
High Dose Pantoprazole for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Need, Evidence, Guidelines and Our Experience.高剂量泮托拉唑治疗胃食管反流病:需求、证据、指南及我们的经验
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):86-91. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1426.
2
Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Diagnosis and Management.难治性胃食管反流病:诊断与管理
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Jan 30;30(1):17-28. doi: 10.5056/jnm23145.
3
A Pharmacogenetics-Based Approach to Managing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Current Perspectives and Future Steps.
一种基于药物遗传学的胃食管反流病管理方法:当前观点与未来方向
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2023 Jun 23;16:645-664. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S371994. eCollection 2023.
4
Effects of obesity on the pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors: current understanding and future implications for patient care and research.肥胖对质子泵抑制剂药理学的影响:当前对患者护理和研究的理解及未来意义。
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2023 Jan;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2023.2178897. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
5
Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Management Update.难治性胃食管反流病:管理更新
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 1;8:765061. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765061. eCollection 2021.
6
Excess Body Weight and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.超重与胃食管反流病
Visc Med. 2021 Aug;37(4):267-272. doi: 10.1159/000516050. Epub 2021 May 7.
7
Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.难治性胃食管反流病的治疗
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2020 Apr;16(4):196-205.
8
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2C19 and Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing.临床药物基因组学实施联盟(CPIC)CYP2C19 和质子泵抑制剂剂量指南。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;109(6):1417-1423. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2015. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
9
Drug Dose Selection in Pediatric Obesity: Available Information for the Most Commonly Prescribed Drugs to Children.儿科肥胖症中的药物剂量选择:最常开给儿童的药物的现有信息。
Paediatr Drugs. 2019 Oct;21(5):357-369. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00352-8.
10
A Population-Based Pharmacokinetic Model Approach to Pantoprazole Dosing for Obese Children and Adolescents.基于人群的奥美拉唑在肥胖儿童和青少年中的药代动力学模型剂量调整方法。
Paediatr Drugs. 2018 Oct;20(5):483-495. doi: 10.1007/s40272-018-0305-1.