Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822.
J Clin Psychol. 2010 Jan;66(1):104-11. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20650.
This Commentary on the Muse and McGrath study (this issue, pp. 96-103) refutes its conclusion that the amount of training for prescription privileges for psychologists (RxP) is equal to or greater than that for psychiatric nurse practitioners and physicians. First, the sample failed to include only training programs for nurses and psychologists that lead to independent prescribing. Second, training was defined by an arbitrary, nonvalidated list of "key content areas" that excluded much of the standard medical curricula for nurses and physicians to prescribe. Third, the levels of training for which the "key content areas" were assessed omitted undergraduate prerequisites, apprenticeships, supervised practice, and residencies that are a standard part of the nursing and physician programs studied. RxP training remains substandard.
这篇对 Muse 和 McGrath 研究的评论(本期,第 96-103 页)驳斥了该研究的结论,即心理学家获得处方权(RxP)的培训量与精神科护士从业者和医生相当或更多。首先,样本未能仅包括导致独立处方的护士和心理学家的培训计划。其次,培训是由一个任意的、未经验证的“关键内容领域”列表定义的,该列表排除了护士和医生规定的标准医学课程的大部分内容,以进行处方。第三,评估“关键内容领域”的培训水平省略了本科前提条件、学徒、监督实践和住院医师,这些都是所研究的护理和医师项目的标准部分。RxP 培训仍然不达标。