Gyüre Balázs, Jánosi Imre M
von Kármán Laboratory of Environmental Flows, Loránd Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Oct;80(4 Pt 2):046307. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046307. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
Laboratory experiments are reported in an immiscible two-fluid system, where thermal convection is initiated by heating at the bottom and cooling at the top. The lava-lamp regime is characterized by a robust periodic exchange process where warm blobs rise from the bottom, attach to the top surface for a while, then cold blobs sink down again. Immiscibility allows to reach real steady (dynamical equilibrium) states which can be sustained for several days. Two modes of lava-lamp convection could be identified by recording and evaluating temperature time series at the bottom and at the top of the container: a "slow" mode is determined by an effective heat transport speed at a given temperature gradient, while a second mode of constant periodicity is viscosity limited. Contrasting of laboratory and geophysical observations yields the conclusion that the frequently suggested lava-lamp analogy fails for the accepted models of mantle convection.
本文报道了在不混溶双流体系统中的实验室实验,该系统中热对流由底部加热和顶部冷却引发。熔岩灯状态的特征是一个稳健的周期性交换过程,即温暖的液滴从底部上升,附着在顶部表面一段时间,然后冷液滴再次下沉。不混溶性使得能够达到可以持续数天的真正稳定(动态平衡)状态。通过记录和评估容器底部和顶部的温度时间序列,可以识别出两种熔岩灯对流模式:“慢”模式由给定温度梯度下的有效热传输速度决定,而第二种具有恒定周期性的模式受粘度限制。对比实验室观测结果和地球物理观测结果得出的结论是,对于公认的地幔对流模型,经常提到的熔岩灯类比并不适用。