• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用数字模型进行高效正畸牙齿测量的技术比较。

Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models.

机构信息

Department of Developmental and Surgical Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):254-61. doi: 10.2319/041709-219.1.

DOI:10.2319/041709-219.1
PMID:19905849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8973218/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the best technique for measuring mesial-distal tooth widths on digital models.

METHODS

The individual mesial-distal tooth widths were measured (first molar to first molar, maxillary and mandibular) on 32 stone casts and corresponding digital models (emodels, GeoDigm, Chanhassen, Minn). The digital models were measured using five different techniques: occlusal aspect, occlusal aspect zooming in on each individual tooth, facial aspect rotating as needed, facial aspect from three standard positions (R buccal, facial, and L buccal), and qualitatively rotating the model in any position deemed necessary. Measurements were repeated three times at least 1 week apart. The operator time needed to complete each set of measurements was recorded.

RESULTS

Four of five digital measurement techniques (except for the facial aspect from three standard positions) showed a slight positive bias (overestimation in measured width) compared with stone cast measurements. Measuring from the occlusal aspect resulted in the greatest Pearson correlation (98.509%), the least Altman-Bland standard deviation of differences value (1.881 mm), and the second fastest measuring time (2 minutes 3 seconds). Qualitatively rotating the model had similar Pearson correlation and Altman-Bland values to the Occlusal technique but took the longest time to measure (7 minutes 1 second).

CONCLUSIONS

The Occlusal measurement technique for digital models was the best combination of accuracy, repeatability, and speed of measurement.

摘要

目的

确定测量数字模型中近远中牙齿宽度的最佳技术。

方法

在 32 个石膏模型和相应的数字模型(emodels、GeoDigm、Chanhassen、Minn)上测量单个近远中牙齿宽度(从第一磨牙到第一磨牙,上颌和下颌)。数字模型使用五种不同技术进行测量:咬合面、每个单独牙齿的咬合面放大、根据需要旋转面、从三个标准位置(颊面 R、颊面和颊面 L)旋转面以及在认为必要的任何位置定性旋转模型。至少间隔 1 周重复测量三次。记录完成每组测量所需的操作员时间。

结果

与石膏模型测量相比,五种数字测量技术中的四种(除了从三个标准位置的面)显示出轻微的正偏差(测量宽度高估)。从咬合面测量导致最大的 Pearson 相关系数(98.509%)、最小的差异值的 Altman-Bland 标准差(1.881 毫米)和第二快的测量时间(2 分 3 秒)。定性旋转模型与咬合技术具有相似的 Pearson 相关系数和 Altman-Bland 值,但测量时间最长(7 分 1 秒)。

结论

数字模型的咬合测量技术是准确性、可重复性和测量速度的最佳组合。

相似文献

1
Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models.利用数字模型进行高效正畸牙齿测量的技术比较。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):254-61. doi: 10.2319/041709-219.1.
2
Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.使用正畸分析软件对石膏模型三维扫描获得的数字模型进行测量:评估者内信度和效度。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jan;77(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s00056-015-0004-2. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.使用电子模型和石膏模型进行空间分析的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.044.
4
Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.牙科石膏模型与三维扫描的正畸测量比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Jul;75(4):264-74. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0217-9. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
5
Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.石膏模型与数字研究模型的有效性、可靠性和可重复性:同行评估评分与Bolton分析及其组成测量的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023.
6
Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.iOC 口内扫描仪的有效性、可靠性和可重复性:牙齿宽度和 Bolton 比值的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):304-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.011.
7
Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.传统石膏模型、印模扫描获得的数字模型和石膏模型扫描获得的数字模型之间的牙齿测量比较。
Int Orthod. 2019 Mar;17(1):151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.用于Bolton分析的三种测量牙宽度方法的有效性、可靠性和可重复性。
Aust Orthod J. 2009 Nov;25(2):97-103.
9
Human Mesiodistal Tooth Width Measurements and Comparison with Dental Cast in a Bangladeshi Population.孟加拉人群体中人类牙齿近远中宽度测量及与石膏模型的比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Apr 1;16(4):299-303. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1679.
10
Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.数字模型与石膏牙模的空间分析评估比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.019.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Dental Measurements in Physical and Digital Orthodontic Case Study Models.物理正畸病例研究模型和数字正畸病例研究模型中的牙齿测量的对比分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 6;58(9):1230. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091230.
2
Validation of three-dimensional digital model superimpositions based on palatal structures in patients with maximum anterior tooth retraction following premolar extraction.基于前磨牙拔除后最大程度内收前牙患者腭部结构的三维数字模型叠加验证
Korean J Orthod. 2022 Jul 25;52(4):258-267. doi: 10.4041/kjod21.126.
3
Comparison of the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Printed Casts, Digital, and Conventional Casts: An In Vitro Study.三维打印模型、数字模型和传统模型准确性的比较:一项体外研究。
Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):189-193. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705243. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners.使用激光和计算机断层扫描石膏模型扫描仪生成的数字模型上,使用两种不同软件程序进行测量的准确性和可靠性。
Korean J Orthod. 2020 Jan;50(1):13-25. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.13. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
5
Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models.对从聚醚橡胶印模和石膏模型的锥形束计算机断层扫描获得的2个数字模型进行三维比较。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2019 Dec;49(4):257-263. doi: 10.5624/isd.2019.49.4.257. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
Comparison of reliability, validity, and accuracy of linear measurements made on pre- and posttreatment digital study models with conventional plaster study models.对治疗前和治疗后数字研究模型与传统石膏研究模型进行线性测量的可靠性、有效性和准确性的比较。
J Orthod Sci. 2019 Oct 4;8:18. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_14_19. eCollection 2019.
7
Reproducibility of digital indirect bonding technique using three-dimensional (3D) models and 3D-printed transfer trays.三维模型和 3D 打印转移托盘数字间接粘接技术的可重复性。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):92-99. doi: 10.2319/030919-176.1. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
8
Analysis of the Morphological Characteristics of the Palatal Rugae for Three-Dimensional Superimposition of Digital Models in Korean Subjects.分析韩国人腭皱襞的形态特征,以实现数字模型的三维叠加。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 26;2018:3936918. doi: 10.1155/2018/3936918. eCollection 2018.
9
[Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling].基于锥形束计算机断层扫描数字建模的3D打印牙科模型制作与精度研究
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 1;36(2):156-161. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2018.02.008.
10
Virtual setup: application in orthodontic practice.虚拟设置:在正畸实践中的应用
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Nov;77(6):409-419. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0048-y. Epub 2016 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times.数字模型与石膏模型:测量结果及所需时间的比较
Prog Orthod. 2007;8(2):252-9.
2
Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.正畸模型的三维成像:一项初步研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):517-22. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm044.
3
Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.使用电子模型和石膏模型进行空间分析的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.044.
4
Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population.正畸人群中的牙体大小差异。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Jul;77(4):668-74. doi: 10.2319/031406-102.
5
Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models.II类患者在虚拟三维模型和传统石膏研究模型之间正畸治疗计划决策的差异。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Oct;130(4):485-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.022.
6
Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.石膏模型与数字研究模型的有效性、可靠性和可重复性:同行评估评分与Bolton分析及其组成测量的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023.
7
The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models.基于计算机的数字模型测量的准确性和可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):298-303. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0298:TAAROM>2.0.CO;2.
8
Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models.用于存档牙科研究模型的三维成像系统准确性评估。
J Orthod. 2003 Sep;30(3):219-23. doi: 10.1093/ortho/30.3.219.
9
Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.使用传统正畸模型和三维虚拟正畸模型评估牙齿大小及牙弓宽度测量的有效性。
Angle Orthod. 2003 Jun;73(3):301-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0301:EOTVOT>2.0.CO;2.
10
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.方法比较研究中的一致性测量
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.