• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工神经网络模型用于决定正畸治疗前是否需要拔牙。

Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated with Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, PR China.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):262-6. doi: 10.2319/111608-588.1.

DOI:10.2319/111608-588.1
PMID:19905850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8973232/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To construct a decision-making expert system (ES) for the orthodontic treatment of patients between 11 and 15 years old to determine whether extraction is needed by using artificial neural networks (ANN). Specifically, we will uncover the factors that affect this decision-making process.

METHODS

A total of 200 subjects were chosen; among them, 120 were accepted for extraction treatments, and 80 were chosen for nonextraction treatments. For each case, 23 indices were selected. A 23-13-1 Back Propagation (BP) ANN model was constructed, and the data for 180 patients were aggregated to constitute the training set. Data for the other 20 patients were used as the testing set.

RESULTS

When data from the 180 patients that had been trained were tested, the result was 100%, as expected. The untrained data from 20 patients in the testing set were 80% correct (ie, 16 cases were forecasted successfully). In the meantime, the relative contributions of the 23 input indices to the final output index (extraction/nonextraction) were calculated. "Anterior teeth uncovered by incompetent lips" and "IMPA (L1-MP)" were the two indices that gave the biggest contributions sequentially; the index of FMA (FH-MP) gave the smallest contribution.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) The constructed artificial neural network in this study was effective, with 80% accuracy, in determining whether extraction or nonextraction treatment was best for malocclusion patients between 11 and 15 years old; (2) when the clinician is predicting whether an orthodontic treatment requires extraction, the indices "anterior teeth uncovered by incompetent lips" and "IMPA (L1-MP)" should be taken into consideration first.

摘要

目的

使用人工神经网络(ANN)为 11 至 15 岁的正畸患者构建决策专家系统(ES),以确定是否需要拔牙。具体来说,我们将揭示影响这一决策过程的因素。

方法

共选择了 200 名受试者;其中,120 名接受拔牙治疗,80 名选择不拔牙治疗。对每个病例,选择了 23 个指标。构建了一个 23-13-1 反向传播(BP)人工神经网络模型,将 180 名患者的数据汇总构成训练集。将其余 20 名患者的数据用作测试集。

结果

当对经过训练的 180 名患者的数据进行测试时,结果为 100%,符合预期。在测试集中的 20 名未受过训练的患者中,有 80%的结果是正确的(即,16 例预测成功)。同时,计算了 23 个输入指标对最终输出指标(拔牙/不拔牙)的相对贡献。“不被无能嘴唇覆盖的前牙”和“IMPA(L1-MP)”是依次贡献最大的两个指标;FMA(FH-MP)指数的贡献最小。

结论

(1)本研究构建的人工神经网络在确定 11 至 15 岁错牙合患者拔牙或不拔牙治疗的最佳方案方面,具有 80%的准确率;(2)当临床医生预测正畸治疗是否需要拔牙时,应首先考虑“不被无能嘴唇覆盖的前牙”和“IMPA(L1-MP)”这两个指标。

相似文献

1
Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment.人工神经网络模型用于决定正畸治疗前是否需要拔牙。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):262-6. doi: 10.2319/111608-588.1.
2
Computational formulation of orthodontic tooth-extraction decisions. Part I: to extract or not to extract.正畸拔牙决策的计算方法。第一部分:拔牙与否。
Angle Orthod. 2009 Sep;79(5):885-91. doi: 10.2319/081908-436.1.
3
New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning.用于神经网络机器学习提取诊断的新方法。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan;149(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.030.
4
Mandibular incisor extraction therapy.下颌切牙拔除疗法
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Feb;105(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70106-7.
5
The decision to extract: Part 1--Interclinician agreement.拔牙决策:第一部分——临床医生之间的一致性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Mar;109(3):297-309. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70153-1.
6
Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.安氏II类1分类错牙合患者拔牙与非拔牙治疗后的治疗及治疗后变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jan;111(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70297-x.
7
Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.拔除和不拔除前磨牙治疗患者的前牙拥挤复发情况。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):775-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.022.
8
Extraction treatment, part 1: the extraction vs. nonextraction debate.拔牙治疗,第1部分:拔牙与不拔牙的争论
J Clin Orthod. 2014 Dec;48(12):753-60.
9
An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.使用同伴评估评分(PAR)指数对拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗进行评估。
Angle Orthod. 1998 Dec;68(6):527-34. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0527:AAOEVN>2.3.CO;2.
10
Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.拔牙与非拔牙患者的长期轮廓变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.034.

引用本文的文献

1
Classification Performance of Deep Learning Models for the Assessment of Vertical Dimension on Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs.深度学习模型在评估头颅侧位X线片垂直距离方面的分类性能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Sep 3;15(17):2240. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172240.
2
Evaluation of the Reliability of AI-Based Large Language Models in Developing Orthodontic Treatment Plans.基于人工智能的大语言模型在制定正畸治疗方案中的可靠性评估。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):e89149. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89149. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Integration of artificial intelligence in orthodontic imaging: A bibliometric analysis of research trends and applications.人工智能在正畸影像学中的整合:研究趋势与应用的文献计量分析
Imaging Sci Dent. 2025 Jun;55(2):151-164. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240237. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
4
Predicting changes of incisor and facial profile following orthodontic treatment: a machine learning approach.预测正畸治疗后切牙和面部轮廓的变化:一种机器学习方法。
Head Face Med. 2025 Mar 28;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00499-5.
5
Artificial intelligence in dentistry-A review.牙科领域的人工智能——综述
Front Dent Med. 2023 Feb 20;4:1085251. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2023.1085251. eCollection 2023.
6
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Medicine: A Critical Review.人工智能在牙科医学中的应用:一项批判性综述。
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):474-486. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.009. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
7
Applications of artificial intelligence in orthodontics: a bibliometric and visual analysis.人工智能在正畸学中的应用:文献计量与可视化分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 16;29(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06158-y.
8
Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: Concerns, Conjectures, and Ethical Dilemmas.正畸学中的人工智能:担忧、推测与伦理困境
Int Dent J. 2025 Feb;75(1):20-22. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.002. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
9
Artificial intelligence-powered dentistry: Probing the potential, challenges, and ethicality of artificial intelligence in dentistry.人工智能驱动的牙科:探究人工智能在牙科领域的潜力、挑战及伦理问题。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 11;10:20552076241291345. doi: 10.1177/20552076241291345. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Evaluation of four machine learning methods in predicting orthodontic extraction decision from clinical examination data and analysis of feature contribution.基于临床检查数据评估四种机器学习方法预测正畸拔牙决策及特征贡献分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Oct 14;12:1483230. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1483230. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural network model for selective attention in visual pattern recognition and associative recall.
Appl Opt. 1987 Dec 1;26(23):4985-92. doi: 10.1364/AO.26.004985.
2
A new supervised learning algorithm for multilayered and interconnected neural networks.
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2000;11(1):36-46. doi: 10.1109/72.822508.
3
A new model of self-organizing neural networks and its application in data projection.一种自组织神经网络的新模型及其在数据投影中的应用。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2001;12(1):153-8. doi: 10.1109/72.896805.
4
EICO-1: an orthodontist-maintained expert system in clinical orthodontics.EICO-1:一种由正畸医生维护的临床正畸专家系统。
Aust Orthod J. 1999 Apr;15(4):219-28.
5
Prognostic factors in clinical decision making: the future.临床决策中的预后因素:未来。
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8 Suppl):1688-95. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1688::aid-cncr1184>3.0.co;2-7.
6
Neural network and regression predictions of 5-year survival after colon carcinoma treatment.结肠癌治疗后5年生存率的神经网络和回归预测。
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8 Suppl):1673-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1673::aid-cncr1182>3.0.co;2-t.
7
Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma.
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8 Suppl):1661-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1661::aid-cncr1180>3.3.co;2-x.
8
Artificial neural networks for prostate carcinoma risk assessment. An overview.用于前列腺癌风险评估的人工神经网络。综述。
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8 Suppl):1647-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1647::aid-cncr1178>3.0.co;2-3.
9
Prediction of individual patient outcome in cancer: comparison of artificial neural networks and Kaplan--Meier methods.癌症患者个体预后的预测:人工神经网络与Kaplan-Meier方法的比较。
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8 Suppl):1643-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1643::aid-cncr1177>3.0.co;2-i.
10
Artificial neural networks: opening the black box.人工神经网络:打开黑箱
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8 Suppl):1615-35. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1615::aid-cncr1175>3.0.co;2-l.