Lu Susan, Malice Marie-Pierre, Dass S Balachandra, Reiss Theodore F
Merck Research Laboratories, Clinical Research, 126 East Lincoln Avenue, RY 34B-348, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA.
J Asthma. 2009 Nov;46(9):878-83. doi: 10.3109/02770900903104540.
Concomitant use of montelukast and loratadine may improve symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) more than treatment with either drug alone.
We compared the efficacy of this combination versus placebo, nasal beclomethasone, montelukast, and loratadine in study 1 and versus placebo, montelukast, and loratadine in study 2.
Patients were randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with intranasal beclomethasone 200 mu g/twice daily (study 1 only), placebo, montelukast 10 mg+loratadine 10 mg, montelukast 10 mg, or loratadine 10 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the Composite Symptom Score (CSS): average of daily diary scores for Daytime Nasal Symptoms and Nighttime Symptoms.
In study 1, improvements in the change from baseline in CSS were seen for montelukast+loratadine (least-squares means [95% CI] = -0.43 [-0.51, -0.35]), beclomethasone (-0.57 [-0.64, -0.49]), montelukast, and loratadine. All treatments were significantly better than placebo; montelukast+loratadine had a significantly greater effect on CSS than montelukast alone but no difference compared to loratadine was detected. Beclomethasone provided significantly greater improvement versus montelukast+loratadine on the primary and secondary endpoints except for the rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life score. In study 2, the combination treatment was similar to montelukast, loratadine, and placebo for the primary and secondary endpoints.
In study 1, montelukast+loratadine had a significantly greater effect on CSS than placebo and montelukast alone; however, in all comparisons, nasal beclomethasone had a greater effect on daily symptoms. In contrast, the combination of montelukast+loratadine in study 2 did not provide greater improvement compared with placebo, montelukast, or loratadine monotherapy, perhaps due to a large placebo effect.
孟鲁司特与氯雷他定联合使用可能比单独使用这两种药物中的任何一种更能改善季节性变应性鼻炎(SAR)的症状。
在研究1中,我们比较了这种联合用药与安慰剂、鼻用倍氯米松、孟鲁司特及氯雷他定的疗效;在研究2中,比较了其与安慰剂、孟鲁司特及氯雷他定的疗效。
患者被随机分配接受双盲治疗,治疗方案为:鼻用倍氯米松200μg,每日两次(仅在研究1中使用)、安慰剂、孟鲁司特10mg+氯雷他定10mg、孟鲁司特10mg或氯雷他定10mg,每日一次。主要终点为综合症状评分(CSS):日间鼻部症状和夜间症状的每日日记评分的平均值。
在研究1中,孟鲁司特+氯雷他定(最小二乘均值[95%CI]=-0.43[-0.51,-0.35])、倍氯米松(-0.57[-0.64,-0.49])、孟鲁司特及氯雷他定在CSS自基线的变化方面均有改善。所有治疗均显著优于安慰剂;孟鲁司特+氯雷他定对CSS的影响显著大于单独使用孟鲁司特,但与氯雷他定相比未检测到差异。除鼻结膜炎生活质量评分外,在主要和次要终点方面,倍氯米松与孟鲁司特+氯雷他定相比改善更显著。在研究2中,联合治疗在主要和次要终点方面与孟鲁司特、氯雷他定及安慰剂相似。
在研究1中,孟鲁司特+氯雷他定对CSS的影响显著大于安慰剂及单独使用孟鲁司特;然而,在所有比较中,鼻用倍氯米松对每日症状的影响更大。相比之下,在研究2中,孟鲁司特+氯雷他定联合用药与安慰剂、孟鲁司特或氯雷他定单药治疗相比,并未带来更大改善,这可能是由于较大的安慰剂效应所致。