Suppr超能文献

国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:变应性鼻炎。

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.

机构信息

Otolaryngology, Emory University, USA.

Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University, USA.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Feb;8(2):108-352. doi: 10.1002/alr.22073.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR.

CONCLUSION

This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.

摘要

背景

为了提高对变应性鼻炎(AR)的认识,并将这些知识恰当地应用于 AR 患者的临床护理,有必要对现有的 AR 文献进行质量和有效性的严格评估。为了评估现有的 AR 文献,国际多学科专家对 AR 进行了研究,制定了过敏和鼻科学国际共识声明:变应性鼻炎(ICAR:AR)。

方法

采用先前描述的方法,制定了与 AR 相关的特定主题。根据可用证据和 ICAR:AR 文件中的目的,为每个主题分配了文献综述、基于证据的综述(EBR)或基于证据的综述和建议(EBRR)格式。在对每个主题进行迭代审查后,综合 ICAR:AR 文件,并由所有作者对共识进行审查。

结果

ICAR:AR 文件涉及与 AR 相关的 100 多个单独主题,包括诊断、病理生理学、流行病学、疾病负担、AR 发展的危险因素、过敏测试方式、治疗以及与 AR 相关的其他疾病/合并症。

结论

对 AR 文献的严格审查确定了一些优势;可以相信,治疗决策得到了严格研究的支持。然而,AR 文献中也存在很大的差距。这些知识差距应被视为改进的机会,因为我们所教授的内容和所实践的医学往往不是基于最佳质量的证据。本文旨在强调 AR 文献的优缺点,以确定未来 AR 研究和更好理解的领域。

相似文献

4
Clinical practice guideline: Allergic rhinitis.临床实践指南:变应性鼻炎。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(1 Suppl):S1-43. doi: 10.1177/0194599814561600.
8
Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis.变应性鼻炎的治疗
Am Fam Physician. 2015 Dec 1;92(11):985-92.
9
Clinical Practice Guideline: Immunotherapy for Inhalant Allergy.临床实践指南:变应原吸入性免疫疗法。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Mar;170 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-S42. doi: 10.1002/ohn.648.

引用本文的文献

9
Alcohol Consumption and Autoimmune Diseases.饮酒与自身免疫性疾病
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jan 20;26(2):845. doi: 10.3390/ijms26020845.

本文引用的文献

2
Central compartment atopic disease.中央区特应性疾病
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2017 Jul 1;31(4):228-234. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4443.
10
Overview of systematic reviews in allergy epidemiology.过敏流行病学系统评价概述。
Allergy. 2017 Jun;72(6):849-856. doi: 10.1111/all.13123. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验