Suppr超能文献

内科住院医师使用三种吸入器(定量吸入器、都保和准纳器)时的不当操作:单次教学后的变化

Inappropriate techniques used by internal medicine residents with three kinds of inhalers (a metered dose inhaler, Diskus, and Turbuhaler): changes after a single teaching session.

作者信息

Kim Sang-Heon, Kwak Hyun Jung, Kim Tae-Bum, Chang Yoon-Seok, Jeong Jae-Won, Kim Cheol-Woo, Yoon Ho Joo, Jee Young Koo

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2009 Nov;46(9):944-50. doi: 10.3109/02770900903229701.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While initial education and regular evaluation of inhaler technique in patients are emphasized in the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, health care professionals are not experienced in using inhalers. This study assessed whether internal medicine residents used common inhalers correctly and whether a single teaching session successfully improved their performance.

METHODS

We evaluated 142 internal medicine residents from six university hospitals in Korea for their techniques with three different inhaler devices: a metered dose inhaler (MDI), Diskus, and Turbuhaler. We assessed whether participants completed each step in using the three inhalers and classified overall performance as good, adequate, or inadequate for each inhaler type. To estimate the effect of a single teaching session, reassessment was performed 2 months after education.

RESULTS

Performance grade was inadequate for 50.7% of participants with a MDI, 43.0% for Diskus, and 51.4% for Turbuhaler. An early year of residency was associated significantly with inappropriate technique for Diskus (p = 0.003), but not for MDI and Turbuhaler. After a single teaching session, overall skills improved significantly for all three inhalers. The proportion of subjects with good or adequate skill changed notably from 39.7% to 83.8% for MDI (p = 0.001), from 50.0% to 86.8% for Diskus (p = 0.001), and from 44.1% to 88.2% for Turbuhaler (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that a high proportion of internal medicine residents cannot use inhalers correctly and just a single teaching can effectively enhance their inhaler technique.

摘要

背景

虽然在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的管理中强调对患者进行吸入器技术的初始教育和定期评估,但医护人员在使用吸入器方面经验不足。本研究评估了内科住院医师是否正确使用常见吸入器,以及单次教学课程是否能成功改善他们的操作。

方法

我们评估了来自韩国六所大学医院的142名内科住院医师使用三种不同吸入器装置的技术:定量吸入器(MDI)、都保和准纳器。我们评估参与者是否完成了使用这三种吸入器的每一步,并将每种吸入器类型的总体操作分类为良好、足够或不足。为了评估单次教学课程的效果,在教育2个月后进行重新评估。

结果

使用MDI的参与者中50.7%的操作等级不足,使用都保的为43.0%,使用准纳器的为51.4%。住院早期与都保的操作技术不当显著相关(p = 0.003),但与MDI和准纳器无关。单次教学课程后,所有三种吸入器的总体技能均有显著提高。操作技能良好或足够的受试者比例从MDI的39.7%显著变化至83.8%(p = 0.001),从都保的50.0%变化至86.8%(p = 0.001),从准纳器的44.1%变化至88.2%(p = 0.001)。

结论

这些发现表明,很大比例的内科住院医师不能正确使用吸入器,而单次教学就能有效提高他们的吸入器技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验