Suppr超能文献

约旦和澳大利亚的哮喘患者和药剂师在使用 Diskus 和 Turbuhaler 时出现用户错误。

User error with Diskus and Turbuhaler by asthma patients and pharmacists in Jordan and Australia.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2011 Dec;56(12):1916-23. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01205. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of inhalers requires accurate completion of multiple steps to ensure effective medication delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the most problematic steps in the use of Diskus and Turbuhaler for pharmacists and patients in Jordon and Australia.

METHODS

With standardized inhaler-technique checklists, we asked community pharmacists to demonstrate the use of Diskus and Turbuhaler. We asked patients with asthma to demonstrate the inhaler (Diskus or Turbuhaler) they were currently using.

RESULTS

Forty-two community pharmacists in Jordan, and 31 in Australia, participated. In Jordan, 51 asthma patients demonstrated use of Diskus, and 40 demonstrated use of Turbuhaler. In Australia, 53 asthma patients demonstrated use of Diskus, and 42 demonstrated use of Turbuhaler.

RESULTS

The pharmacists in Australia had received inhaler-technique education more recently than those in Jordan (P = .03). With Diskus, few pharmacists in either country demonstrated correct technique for step 3 (exhale to residual volume) or step 4 (exhale away from the device), although there were somewhat fewer errors in Australia than Jordan (16% vs 0% in step 3, P = .007, and 20% vs 0% in step 4, P = .003 via chi-square test). With Turbuhaler there were significant differences between the pharmacists from Australia and Jordan, mainly in step 2 (hold the device upright while loading, 45% vs 2% correct, P < .001). Few of the patients had received inhaler-technique education in the previous year. The patients made errors similar to those of the pharmacists in individual steps with Diskus and Turbuhaler. The essential steps with Diskus were performed correctly more often by the Jordanian patients, and with Turbuhaler by the Australian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in Jordan's and Australia's health systems, pharmacists from both Australia and Jordan had difficulty with the same Diskus and Turbuhaler steps. In both countries, the errors made by the asthma patients were similar to those made by the pharmacists.

摘要

背景

使用吸入器需要准确完成多个步骤,以确保药物有效输送。

目的

评估在约旦和澳大利亚,药剂师和患者在使用都保和准纳器时最困难的步骤。

方法

使用标准化的吸入器技术清单,我们要求社区药剂师演示都保和准纳器的使用方法。我们要求正在使用哮喘吸入器(都保或准纳器)的患者进行演示。

结果

42 名约旦社区药剂师和 31 名澳大利亚社区药剂师参与了研究。在约旦,51 名哮喘患者演示了都保的使用方法,40 名哮喘患者演示了准纳器的使用方法。在澳大利亚,53 名哮喘患者演示了都保的使用方法,42 名哮喘患者演示了准纳器的使用方法。

结果

澳大利亚的药剂师接受吸入器技术教育的时间比约旦的药剂师更近(P =.03)。在使用都保时,两国的药剂师都很少能正确演示第 3 步(呼气至残气量)或第 4 步(从装置中呼气),尽管澳大利亚的错误率略低于约旦(第 3 步分别为 16%和 0%,P =.007,第 4 步分别为 20%和 0%,P =.003,通过卡方检验)。在使用准纳器时,澳大利亚和约旦的药剂师之间存在显著差异,主要在第 2 步(装粉时保持装置直立,45%和 2%正确,P <.001)。在过去的一年里,很少有患者接受过吸入器技术教育。患者在个别步骤中与药剂师犯了相似的错误,使用都保和准纳器时也是如此。约旦患者更经常正确地执行都保的关键步骤,而澳大利亚患者则更经常正确地执行准纳器的关键步骤。

结论

尽管约旦和澳大利亚的卫生系统存在差异,但来自两国的药剂师在使用都保和准纳器时都遇到了困难。在这两个国家,哮喘患者犯的错误与药剂师犯的错误相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验