The Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Eur J Pain. 2010 Jul;14(6):608-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Endogenous analgesia (EA) can be reflected by diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC), non-noxious inhibitory control (NNIC) and habituation to repeated painful stimuli. However, the coexistence of these phenomena in a given individual and the degree to which various factors predict their magnitudes have not been fully investigated. Using experimental paradigms of DNIC, NNIC and habituation, the present study explored the relationships between - and the contribution factors to - the magnitude of EA exhibited by healthy volunteers (n=191; 104 F, 87 M) exposed to these three experimental paradigms. Each subject was assigned to all three paradigms (DNIC-tested by co-administering repeated short painful heat stimuli and a conditioning tonic cold pain stimulation; NNIC - tested similarly with the exception of using a painless conditioning stimulation; habituation - tested by applying repeated painful heat stimuli only) in a random order. Pain intensities decreased from baseline in all three paradigms. However, DNIC produced significantly more pain reduction than the other two modes (RM-ANOVA). The magnitude of pain reduction of DNIC was found to be highly correlated with that of NNIC and habituation (r=0.56, p<0.001 for both correlations). A hierarchical regression analysis showed that baseline (p<0.001) and conditioning pain scores (p=0.043) predicted the magnitude of DNIC. A gender split analysis showed that conditioning pain scores served as a predictive factor for men only.
Under these experimental conditions, different EA conditions seem to be related to each other. High initial pain intensities predict 'effective' DNIC and habituation, whereas intensity of the conditioning stimulus determines the magnitude of DNIC in men only.
内源性镇痛(EA)可以通过弥散性伤害性抑制控制(DNIC)、非伤害性抑制控制(NNIC)和对重复疼痛刺激的习惯化来反映。然而,在给定个体中这些现象的共存以及各种因素预测其幅度的程度尚未得到充分研究。本研究使用 DNIC、NNIC 和习惯化的实验范式,探讨了健康志愿者(n=191;104 名女性,87 名男性)在暴露于这三种实验范式时 EA 幅度的相关性及其影响因素。每个受试者都被分配到所有三种范式(DNIC 通过同时给予重复的短痛热刺激和条件性持续冷痛刺激来测试;NNIC 以类似的方式测试,只是使用无痛的条件刺激;习惯化 - 仅通过应用重复的痛热刺激来测试),顺序随机。所有三种范式的疼痛强度均从基线下降。然而,DNIC 比其他两种模式(RM-ANOVA)产生的疼痛缓解幅度更大。DNIC 的疼痛缓解幅度与 NNIC 和习惯化的幅度高度相关(r=0.56,两者的相关性均为 p<0.001)。分层回归分析表明,基线(p<0.001)和条件疼痛评分(p=0.043)预测了 DNIC 的幅度。性别分裂分析表明,条件疼痛评分仅作为男性的预测因素。
在这些实验条件下,不同的 EA 条件似乎相互关联。较高的初始疼痛强度预测有效的 DNIC 和习惯化,而条件刺激的强度仅决定男性的 DNIC 幅度。