Li Janet Z, Mills Emily P, Osborne Natalie R, Cheng Joshua C, Sanmugananthan Vaidhehi V, El-Sayed Rima, Besik Ariana, Kim Junseok A, Bosma Rachael L, Rogachov Anton, Davis Karen D
Division of Brain, Imaging, and Behaviour, Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Pain. 2025 Jun 1;166(6):1436-1449. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003478. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
The perception of pain and ability to cope with it varies widely amongst people, which in part could be due to the presence of inhibitory (antinociceptive) or facilitatory (pronociceptive) effects in conditioned pain modulation (CPM). This study examined whether individual differences in CPM reflect functional connectivity (FC) strengths within nodes of the descending antinociceptive pathway (DAP). A heat-based CPM paradigm and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) were used to test the hypothesis that an individual's capacity to exhibit inhibitory CPM (changes in test stimuli [TS] pain due to a conditioning stimulus [CS]) reflects FC of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), periaqueductal gray (PAG), and rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). A total of 151 healthy participants (72 men, 79 women) underwent CPM testing and rs-fMRI. Three types of CPM were identified based on the effect of the CS on TS pain: (1) Antinociception: CS reduced TS pain in 45% of participants, (2) No-CPM: CS did not change TS pain in 15% of participants, and (3) Pronociception: CS increased TS pain in 40% of participants. Only the Antinociceptive subgroup exhibited FC between the left sgACC and PAG, right sgACC and PAG, and RVM and PAG. Furthermore, only the Antinociceptive subgroup exhibited a correlation of both left and right sgACC-RVM FC (medium effect sizes) with CPM effect magnitude. Women, compared with men were more likely to be categorized as pronociceptive. These data support the proposition that FC of the DAP reflects or contributes to inhibitory CPM.
人们对疼痛的感知以及应对疼痛的能力差异很大,部分原因可能是在条件性疼痛调制(CPM)中存在抑制性(抗伤害性)或易化性(促伤害性)效应。本研究探讨了CPM中的个体差异是否反映了下行抗伤害性通路(DAP)各节点内的功能连接(FC)强度。采用基于热刺激的CPM范式和静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)来检验以下假设:个体表现出抑制性CPM的能力(由条件刺激[CS]引起的测试刺激[TS]疼痛变化)反映了膝下前扣带回皮质(sgACC)、导水管周围灰质(PAG)和延髓头端腹内侧网状结构(RVM)的FC。共有151名健康参与者(72名男性,79名女性)接受了CPM测试和rs-fMRI检查。根据CS对TS疼痛的影响确定了三种类型的CPM:(1)抗伤害性:45%的参与者中CS减轻了TS疼痛;(2)无CPM:15%的参与者中CS未改变TS疼痛;(3)促伤害性:40%的参与者中CS增加了TS疼痛。只有抗伤害性子组在左侧sgACC与PAG、右侧sgACC与PAG以及RVM与PAG之间表现出FC。此外,只有抗伤害性子组在左右sgACC-RVM FC(中等效应量)与CPM效应大小之间表现出相关性。与男性相比,女性更有可能被归类为促伤害性。这些数据支持了DAP的FC反映或促成抑制性CPM这一观点。