• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为反应偏差测量指标的沃灵顿词语识别记忆测验:基于“真实世界”可信和不可信被试开发的总得分和反应时截断值。

The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: total score and response time cutoffs developed on "real world" credible and noncredible subjects.

机构信息

Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, CA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Feb;25(1):60-70. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp088. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acp088
PMID:19906738
Abstract

Several studies have examined the usefulness of the Warrington Recognition Memory Test-Words as a measure to detect suspect effort, although samples have generally been small and/or comprised of simulators rather than "real world" credible and noncredible patients. The current study examined the Warrington Recognition Memory Test-Words total score and response time of "real world" noncredible patients (as determined by motive to feign, failure on > or =2 independent measures of response bias, low cognitive scores inconsistent with normal ADLs; n = 190) versus credible patients (as determined by no motive to feign, failure of < or =1 measure of response bias; n = 124) derived from an archival database of individuals from the Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Outpatient Neuropsychology Service, and the private practice of the second author. Noncredible patients obtained significantly lower total scores and longer times to complete the task. A total correct cutoff of < or =42 was found to have excellent specificity (91.9%) and sensitivity (88.9%), whereas a time cutoff of > or =207'' was associated with 65.5% sensitivity at 90.7% specificity, and when the time cut-score was used in combination with the total score cutoff, an additional 5% of the noncredible participants were captured, raising overall sensitivity to 93.7% (at 87.1% specificity). Thus, the Warrington Recognition Memory Test-Words, although not originally created for the purposes of measuring suspect effort, appears to be an excellent measure for detecting response bias on neuropsychological testing.

摘要

几项研究考察了 Warrington 识别记忆测试词作为检测可疑努力的指标的有效性,尽管样本通常较小,并且/或者由模拟者而不是“真实世界”中可信和不可信的患者组成。本研究考察了来自 Harbor-UCLA 医疗中心精神病学部门诊神经心理学服务处档案数据库以及第二位作者私人执业的“真实世界”不可信患者(通过伪装动机、在 > 或 =2 项独立的反应偏差测量中失败、认知分数低与正常的 ADL 不一致来确定;n = 190)与可信患者(通过无伪装动机、< 或 =1 项反应偏差测量失败来确定;n = 124)的 Warrington 识别记忆测试词总得分和反应时间。不可信患者的总得分明显较低,完成任务的时间也较长。发现总正确得分为<或=42 的截断值具有极好的特异性(91.9%)和敏感性(88.9%),而时间截断值>或=207“与 65.5%的敏感性相关,特异性为 90.7%,当时间切分分数与总分数切分结合使用时,另外 5%的不可信参与者被捕获,总体敏感性提高到 93.7%(特异性为 87.1%)。因此,Warrington 识别记忆测试词虽然最初不是为测量可疑努力而创建的,但似乎是检测神经心理测试中反应偏差的极好指标。

相似文献

1
The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: total score and response time cutoffs developed on "real world" credible and noncredible subjects.作为反应偏差测量指标的沃灵顿词语识别记忆测验:基于“真实世界”可信和不可信被试开发的总得分和反应时截断值。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Feb;25(1):60-70. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp088. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
2
Comparison of various RAVLT scores in the detection of noncredible memory performance.在检测不可信记忆表现中各种雷伊听觉词语学习测验(RAVLT)分数的比较。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 May;20(3):301-19. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.08.001.
3
The utility of the Rey Word Recognition Test in the detection of suspect effort.雷氏词语识别测验在检测可疑努力程度方面的效用。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):873-87. doi: 10.1080/13854040590967603.
4
Use of the WAIS-III picture completion subtest as an embedded measure of response bias.使用韦氏智力测验第三版图片完成测验作为反应偏差的嵌入式测量。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Oct;24(7):1243-56. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2010.514864.
5
Sensitivity and specificity of a digit symbol recognition trial in the identification of response bias.数字符号识别试验在识别反应偏差中的灵敏度和特异性。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Aug;25(5):420-8. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq040. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
6
Effectiveness of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test and the Meyers and Meyers recognition trial in the detection of suspect effort.雷-奥斯特里茨复杂图形测验及迈尔斯与迈尔斯识别试验在检测可疑努力方面的有效性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Aug;17(3):426-40. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.3.426.18083.
7
Relationships between eight measures of suspect effort.八种可疑努力程度衡量指标之间的关系。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 May;17(2):263-72. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.2.263.16511.
8
Sensitivity and specificity of finger tapping test scores for the detection of suspect effort.用于检测可疑用力的手指轻敲测试分数的敏感性和特异性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 Feb;19(1):105-20. doi: 10.1080/13854040490888567.
9
Dementia and effort test performance.痴呆与努力测试表现。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Jan;23(1):133-52. doi: 10.1080/13854040701819050. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
10
Examination of various WMS-III logical memory scores in the assessment of response bias.在评估反应偏差时,检查各种 WMS-III 逻辑记忆分数。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Feb;24(2):344-57. doi: 10.1080/13854040903307268. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial differences in positive findings on embedded performance validity tests.嵌入式表现效度测试阳性结果中的种族差异。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025 Jan-Feb;32(1):28-36. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2146504. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
2
Functional MRI Changes in Patients after Thyroidectomy under General Anesthesia.全麻下甲状腺切除术后患者的功能磁共振成像变化。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 21;2022:1935125. doi: 10.1155/2022/1935125. eCollection 2022.
3
Response Time Measures as Supplementary Validity Indicators in Forced-Choice Recognition Memory Performance Validity Tests: A Systematic Review.
反应时间作为迫选再认记忆表现测验中补充效标效度指标的研究:系统综述
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Mar;32(1):71-98. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09499-z. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Penile transplantation: the US experience and institutional program set-up.阴茎移植:美国的经验及机构项目设置
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Aug;7(4):639-645. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.03.14.