Pepperdine University, West Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Aug;25(5):420-8. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq040. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
Recently published practice standards recommend that multiple effort indicators be interspersed throughout neuropsychological evaluations to assess for response bias, which is most efficiently accomplished through use of effort indicators from standard cognitive tests already included in test batteries. The present study examined the utility of a timed recognition trial added to standard administration of the WAIS-III Digit Symbol subtest in a large sample of "real world" noncredible patients (n=82) as compared with credible neuropsychology clinic patients (n=89). Scores from the recognition trial were more sensitive in identifying poor effort than were standard Digit Symbol scores, and use of an equation incorporating Digit Symbol Age-Corrected Scaled Scores plus accuracy and time scores from the recognition trial was associated with nearly 80% sensitivity at 88.7% specificity. Thus, inclusion of a brief recognition trial to Digit Symbol administration has the potential to provide accurate assessment of response bias.
最近发表的实践标准建议在神经心理学评估中穿插使用多种努力指标,以评估反应偏差,这可以通过使用已经包含在测试组合中的标准认知测试中的努力指标来最有效地完成。本研究在大量“真实世界”不可信患者(n=82)与可信神经心理学诊所患者(n=89)中,比较了在 WAIS-III 数字符号子测验的标准施测中添加定时再认测验对识别不佳努力的效用。与标准数字符号分数相比,再认测验的分数更能敏感地识别出较差的努力,并且使用包含数字符号年龄校正量表分数加上再认测验的准确性和时间分数的方程,在 88.7%特异性时具有近 80%的敏感性。因此,在数字符号施测中添加简短的再认测验有可能提供对反应偏差的准确评估。