住院医师临床医生是否是优秀的教师？多维住院医师评估。
Are successful resident clinicians good teachers? Multidimensional resident assessment.
出版信息
Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10 Suppl):S46-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b37c12.
BACKGROUND
GME training programs must demonstrate residents are prepared as both teachers and clinicians. We examined the relationship between faculty evaluations of residents' clinical performance and student evaluations of residents' teaching performance.
METHOD
Concordance tables for mean ratings and qualitative analysis of comments among 95 residents receiving evaluations by 267 faculty and 106 students.
RESULTS
A total of 88% of residents received concordant ratings from faculty and students. When discordant, faculty gave higher ratings (P = .003). Ninety and ninety-one percent of faculty and student comments exhibited a positive tone.
CONCLUSIONS
Faculty and students tended to agree on the successful and unsuccessful residents, supporting the validity of rating scale evaluations. Future research might focus on how to tailor resident remediation when discordant ratings or comments occur.
背景
医学教育（GME）培训项目必须证明住院医师具备作为教师和临床医生的双重能力。我们考察了教师对住院医师临床表现的评价与学生对住院医师教学表现的评价之间的关系。
方法
对 267 名教师和 106 名学生对 95 名住院医师进行评价的平均评分进行一致性表格分析，并对评论进行定性分析。
结果
共有 88%的住院医师获得了教师和学生的一致性评价。当评价不一致时，教师的评分更高（P =.003）。90%和 91%的教师和学生评论表现出积极的语气。
结论
教师和学生往往对表现出色和表现不佳的住院医师达成一致意见，支持评分量表评价的有效性。未来的研究可能集中在出现不一致的评价或评论时，如何针对住院医师的不足之处进行调整。
Zotero 插件