• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝外伤的平衡管理与较低的肝相关死亡率相关。

Balanced management of hepatic trauma is associated with low liver-related mortality.

机构信息

Division of Visceral-, Transplantation-, Thoracic- and Vascular- Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Apr;395(4):381-6. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0566-9. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-009-0566-9
PMID:19908061
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatic trauma is a rare surgical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic strategies have been controversially discussed during the last decades.

METHODS

The medical records of 47 consecutive patients with hepatic trauma treated at the University Hospital of Leipzig between 2004 and 2008 were retrospectively reviewed for the severity of liver injury, management, morbidity, and mortality and compared to a preceding cohort. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors influencing mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to 63 patients treated between 1993 and 2003, moderate liver injuries (grades I-III) occurred more frequently (p = 0.0006), and the proportion of patients that were managed operatively decreased from 68.9% to 37.5%. Twenty patients (42.6%) were treated conservatively (all grades I to III) and 27 surgically (47.4%). In detail, five patients were treated by hepatic packing alone, 13 by suture or coagulation, five by atypical resection, and four by hemihepatectomy. The overall mortality was 8.5% with a liver-related mortality rate of 2.1%. According to severity grades I-III, IV, and V, mortality rates were 0%, 18.2%, and 50.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified Injury Severity Score (ISS) >30, Moore grades IV and V, hemoglobin at admission <6.0 mmol/L, and need for transfusion of >12 erythrocyte concentrates to be significant risk factors for early posttraumatic death, while multivariate analysis only ISS >30 revealed to be of prognostic significance for early postoperative survival.

CONCLUSION

Compared to a previous cohort in the same hospital, more patients were treated conservatively. Management of liver injuries presented with a low liver-related mortality rate. Grades I-III injuries can safely be treated by conservative means with excellent results. However, complex hepatic injuries may often require surgical treatment ranging from packing to complex hemihepatectomy. Hence, for selection of appropriate therapeutic options, patients with hepatic injuries should be treated in a specialized institution.

摘要

背景

肝外伤是一种罕见的外科急症,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。在过去几十年中,治疗策略一直存在争议。

方法

回顾性分析了 2004 年至 2008 年莱比锡大学医院收治的 47 例肝外伤患者的病历,评估肝损伤严重程度、治疗方法、发病率和死亡率,并与前一组进行比较。采用逻辑回归分析确定影响死亡率的危险因素。

结果

与 1993 年至 2003 年期间治疗的 63 例患者相比,中度肝损伤(I-III 级)更为常见(p = 0.0006),手术治疗的比例从 68.9%下降至 37.5%。20 例(42.6%)患者接受保守治疗(所有 I-III 级),27 例患者接受手术治疗(47.4%)。具体来说,5 例患者单独接受肝包扎治疗,13 例患者接受缝合或凝固治疗,5 例患者接受非典型性肝切除术,4 例患者接受半肝切除术。总体死亡率为 8.5%,与肝相关的死亡率为 2.1%。根据严重程度分级 I-III、IV 和 V,死亡率分别为 0%、18.2%和 50.0%。单因素分析发现损伤严重度评分(ISS)>30、摩尔分级 IV 和 V、入院时血红蛋白<6.0mmol/L 以及需要输注>12 单位红细胞浓缩物是早期创伤后死亡的显著危险因素,而多因素分析仅发现 ISS>30 是术后早期生存的预后意义。

结论

与同一医院的前一组相比,更多的患者接受了保守治疗。肝损伤的治疗方法具有较低的肝相关死亡率。I-III 级损伤可安全地采用保守方法治疗,效果极佳。然而,复杂的肝损伤可能经常需要手术治疗,范围从填塞到复杂的半肝切除术。因此,为了选择合适的治疗方案,肝损伤患者应在专门机构接受治疗。

相似文献

1
Balanced management of hepatic trauma is associated with low liver-related mortality.肝外伤的平衡管理与较低的肝相关死亡率相关。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Apr;395(4):381-6. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0566-9. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
2
[Surgical management, prognostic factors, and outcome in hepatic trauma].[肝外伤的手术治疗、预后因素及结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2005 Feb;108(2):127-34. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0830-y.
3
Operative management and outcomes in 103 AAST-OIS grades IV and V complex hepatic injuries: trauma surgeons still need to operate, but angioembolization helps.103例美国创伤外科学会-器官损伤分级(AAST-OIS)IV级和V级复杂性肝损伤的手术治疗及结果:创伤外科医生仍需进行手术,但血管栓塞术有帮助。
J Trauma. 2003 Apr;54(4):647-53; discussion 653-4. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000054647.59217.BB.
4
Pediatric hepatic trauma: does clinical course support intensive care unit stay?小儿肝外伤:临床病程是否支持入住重症监护病房?
J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Oct;33(10):1459-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90474-2.
5
Major hepatic necrosis: a common complication after angioembolization for treatment of high-grade liver injuries.大面积肝坏死:血管栓塞治疗重度肝损伤后的常见并发症。
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):621-7; discussion 627-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819919f2.
6
Severe hepatic trauma: a multi-center experience with 1,335 liver injuries.严重肝外伤:1335例肝损伤的多中心经验
J Trauma. 1988 Oct;28(10):1433-8.
7
Predictive factors of morbidity and mortality in grade IV and V liver trauma undergoing perihepatic packing: single institution 14 years experience at European trauma centre.肝外伤 IV 级和 V 级行肝周填塞术患者的发病率和死亡率的预测因素:欧洲创伤中心 14 年单中心经验。
Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1347-54. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
8
Operative and nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in adults: a single-center report.成人钝性肝损伤的手术与非手术治疗:单中心报告
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(4):387-91. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1177-2. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
9
Factors determining operative mortality of grade V blunt hepatic trauma.决定Ⅴ级钝性肝外伤手术死亡率的因素。
J Trauma. 2000 Nov;49(5):886-91. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200011000-00016.
10
Surgical management and outcome of blunt major liver injuries: experience of damage control laparotomy with perihepatic packing in one trauma centre.钝性严重肝损伤的手术治疗及结果:某创伤中心采用肝周填塞损伤控制剖腹术的经验
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical treatment in hepatic trauma: factors associated with hospitalization time.肝外伤的外科治疗:与住院时间相关的因素。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021 Mar 24;48:e20202784. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202874. eCollection 2021.
2
Use of Sengstaken-Blakemore intrahepatic balloon: an alternative for liver-penetrating injuries.使用 Sengstaken-Blakemore 肝内球囊:穿透性肝损伤的替代治疗方法。
World J Surg. 2012 Sep;36(9):2119-24. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1625-x.
3
Challenges of surgical trauma emergency admission.外科创伤急诊入院的挑战。

本文引用的文献

1
Selective management of blunt hepatic injuries including nonoperative management is a safe and effective strategy.包括非手术治疗在内的钝性肝损伤的选择性管理是一种安全有效的策略。
Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):606-10; discussion 610-1. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.018.
2
Changes in the management of injuries to the liver and spleen.肝脏和脾脏损伤管理的变化。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 May;200(5):648-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.11.005.
3
[Surgical management, prognostic factors, and outcome in hepatic trauma].[肝外伤的手术治疗、预后因素及结果]
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Apr;396(4):499-505. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0771-1. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
Unfallchirurg. 2005 Feb;108(2):127-34. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0830-y.
4
Delayed celiotomy for the treatment of bile leak, compartment syndrome, and other hazards of nonoperative management of blunt liver injury.延迟剖腹手术用于治疗胆汁漏、骨筋膜室综合征以及钝性肝损伤非手术治疗的其他风险。
Am J Surg. 2003 May;185(5):492-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00046-1.
5
A 10-year experience of complex liver trauma.复杂肝外伤的十年经验
Br J Surg. 2002 Dec;89(12):1532-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02272.x.
6
Factors determining operative mortality of grade V blunt hepatic trauma.决定Ⅴ级钝性肝外伤手术死亡率的因素。
J Trauma. 2000 Nov;49(5):886-91. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200011000-00016.
7
Evolution in the management of hepatic trauma: a 25-year perspective.肝外伤治疗的演变:25年回顾
Ann Surg. 2000 Sep;232(3):324-30. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00004.
8
Blunt hepatic injury: a paradigm shift from operative to nonoperative management in the 1990s.钝性肝损伤:20世纪90年代从手术治疗到非手术治疗的模式转变。
Ann Surg. 2000 Jun;231(6):804-13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200006000-00004.
9
[Surgical management of liver rupture].[肝破裂的外科治疗]
Chirurg. 1999 Mar;70(3):253-8. doi: 10.1007/s001040050639.
10
Evolution in the management of the complex liver injury at a Level I trauma center.
J Trauma. 1998 Jul;45(1):79-82. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00016.