Suppr超能文献

钝性严重肝损伤的手术治疗及结果:某创伤中心采用肝周填塞损伤控制剖腹术的经验

Surgical management and outcome of blunt major liver injuries: experience of damage control laparotomy with perihepatic packing in one trauma centre.

作者信息

Lin Being-Chuan, Fang Jen-Feng, Chen Ray-Jade, Wong Yon-Cheong, Hsu Yu-Pao

机构信息

Division of Trauma & Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan Hsien, Taiwan.

出版信息

Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study aimed to assess the clinical experience and outcome of damage control laparotomy with perihepatic packing in the management of blunt major liver injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1998 to December 2006, 58 patients of blunt major liver injury, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) equal or greater than III, were operated with perihepatic packing at our institute. Demographic data, intra-operative findings, operative procedures, adjunctive managements and outcome were reviewed. To determine whether there was statistical difference between the survivor and non-survivor groups, data were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, either Pearson's chi-square test or with Yates continuity correction for contingency tables, and results were considered statistically significant if p<0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients, 20 (35%) were classified as AAST-OIS grade III, 24 (41%) as grade IV, and 14 (24%) as grade V. At laparotomy, depending on the severity of injuries, all 58 patients underwent various liver-related procedures and perihepatic packing. The more frequent liver-related procedures included debridement hepatectomy (n=21), hepatorrhaphy (n=19), selective hepatic artery ligation (n=11) and 7 patients required post-laparotomy hepatic transarterial embolization. Of the 58 patients, 28 survived and 30 died with a 52% mortality rate. Of the 30 deaths, uncontrolled liver bleeding in 24-h caused 25 deaths and delayed sepsis caused residual 5 deaths. The mortality rate versus OIS was grade III: 30% (6/20), grade IV: 54% (13/24), and grade V: 79% (11/14), respectively. On univariate analysis, the significant predictors of mortality were OIS grade (p=0.019), prolonged initial prothrombin time (PT) (p=0.004), active partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (p<0.0001) and decreased platelet count (p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate of surgical blunt major liver injuries remains high even with perihepatic packing. Since prolonged initial PT, APTT and decreased platelet count were associated with high risk of mortality, we advocate combination of damage control resuscitation with damage control laparotomy in these major liver injuries.

摘要

引言

本回顾性研究旨在评估采用肝周填塞的损伤控制剖腹术治疗钝性严重肝损伤的临床经验及结果。

材料与方法

1998年1月至2006年12月,我院对58例钝性严重肝损伤患者(美国创伤外科学会器官损伤分级量表[AAST - OIS]等于或大于III级)进行了肝周填塞手术。回顾了患者的人口统计学数据、术中发现、手术操作、辅助治疗及结果。为确定存活组与非存活组之间是否存在统计学差异,对连续变量采用曼 - 惠特尼U检验,对列联表采用Pearson卡方检验或耶茨连续性校正检验,若p<0.05,则结果具有统计学意义。

结果

58例患者中,20例(35%)被归类为AAST - OIS III级,24例(41%)为IV级,14例(24%)为V级。剖腹术中,根据损伤严重程度,所有58例患者均接受了各种与肝脏相关的手术及肝周填塞。较常见的与肝脏相关的手术包括清创性肝切除术(n = 21)、肝缝合术(n = 19)、选择性肝动脉结扎术(n = 11),7例患者术后需要行经肝动脉栓塞术。58例患者中,28例存活,30例死亡,死亡率为52%。30例死亡患者中,24小时内无法控制的肝脏出血导致25例死亡,延迟性脓毒症导致其余5例死亡。死亡率与OIS分级的关系为:III级:30%(6/20),IV级:54%(13/24),V级:79%(11/14)。单因素分析显示,死亡率的显著预测因素为OIS分级(p = 0.019)、初始凝血酶原时间(PT)延长(p = 0.004)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)(p<0.0001)及血小板计数降低(p = 0.005)。

结论

即使采用肝周填塞,钝性严重肝损伤的手术死亡率仍然很高。由于初始PT、APTT延长及血小板计数降低与高死亡率相关,我们主张在这些严重肝损伤中采用损伤控制复苏与损伤控制剖腹术相结合的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验