The Chicago Institute of Neurosurgery and Neuroresearch, 2515 North Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Epilepsia. 1997 Nov;38(11 Suppl):S63-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb06132.x.
Sudden death in epilepsy has recently found its way into both civil and criminal litigation in the United States. Civil cases commonly involve actions or inactions by physicians with respect to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) alleged to have caused sudden unexpected death in a patient with epilepsy (SUDEP). The context may be discontinuation or change of AEDs or failure to warn of the complication of SUDEP. A common issue in adjudication of such cases is the role of causality of medication type and level in SUDEP. Current knowledge does not permit an accurate assessment of risk for medication discontinuation or poor compliance. Related issues are discussed. In criminal litigation, SUDEP has been accepted by a Federal Court as a cause of death in a crime victim for whom the actions of the accused caused an epileptic state.
癫痫猝死最近已成为美国民事和刑事诉讼的一个问题。民事诉讼通常涉及医生对据称因抗癫痫药物(AED)导致癫痫患者猝死(SUDEP)的药物的不作为或作为。这种不作为或作为可能表现为停用或改变 AED 或未能警告 SUDEP 的并发症。在裁决此类案件时,一个常见的问题是药物类型和水平在 SUDEP 中的因果关系。目前的知识还不能准确评估停药或不遵医嘱的风险。相关问题进行了讨论。在刑事诉讼中,联邦法院已将 SUDEP 作为犯罪受害者的死因予以接受,对于该受害者,被告的行为导致了癫痫状态。