• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

64层螺旋CT血管造影术测量的支架间隙与支架内再狭窄、断裂及重叠失败的关系

Stent gap by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography relationship to in-stent restenosis, fracture, and overlap failure.

作者信息

Hecht Harvey S, Polena Sotir, Jelnin Vladimir, Jimenez Marcelo, Bhatti Tandeep, Parikh Manish, Panagopoulos Georgia, Roubin Gary

机构信息

Lenox Hill Heart & Vascular Institute, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 17;54(21):1949-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.045.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.045
PMID:19909876
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to define the frequency of stent gaps by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and their relation to in-stent restenosis (ISR), stent fracture (SF), and overlap failure (OF).

BACKGROUND

SF defined by catheter angiography or intravascular ultrasound has been implicated in ISR.

METHODS

A total of 292 consecutive patients, with 613 stents, who underwent CTA were evaluated for stent gaps associated with decreased Hounsfield units. Correlations with catheter coronary angiography (CCA) were available in 143 patients with 384 stents.

RESULTS

Stent gaps were noted in 16.9% by CTA and 1.0% by CCA. ISR by CCA was noted in 46.1% of the stent gaps (p < 0.001) as determined by CCA, and stent gaps by CTA accounted for 27.8% of the total ISR (p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, stent diameter > or =3 mm was the only CCA characteristic significantly associated with stent gaps (p = 0.002), but was not a significant predictor by multivariate analysis. Bifurcation stents, underlying calcification, stent type, location, post-dilation, and overlapping stents were not observed to be predisposing factors. Excessive tortuosity and lack of conformability were not associated with stent gaps; however, their frequency was insufficient to permit meaningful analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent gap by CTA: 1) is associated with 28% of ISR, and ISR is found in 46% of stent gaps; 2) is associated with > or =3-mm stents by univariate (p = 0.002) but not by multivariate analysis; 3) is infrequently noted on catheter angiography; and 4) most likely represents SF in the setting of a single stent, and may represent SF or OF in overlapping stents.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是通过64层螺旋CT血管造影(CTA)确定支架间隙的发生率及其与支架内再狭窄(ISR)、支架断裂(SF)和重叠失败(OF)的关系。

背景

导管血管造影或血管内超声所定义的SF与ISR有关。

方法

对连续292例接受CTA检查的患者(共613个支架)进行评估,以确定与亨氏单位降低相关的支架间隙。143例患者(384个支架)可获得与导管冠状动脉造影(CCA)的相关性。

结果

CTA显示支架间隙发生率为16.9%,CCA显示为1.0%。CCA确定的支架间隙中,46.1%出现了CCA定义的ISR(p<0.001),CTA显示的支架间隙占总ISR的27.8%(p<0.001)。单因素分析中,支架直径≥3mm是唯一与支架间隙显著相关的CCA特征(p=0.002),但多因素分析中并非显著预测因素。未观察到分叉支架、潜在钙化、支架类型、位置、后扩张及重叠支架是易患因素。过度迂曲和顺应性不足与支架间隙无关;然而,其发生率不足以进行有意义的分析。

结论

CTA显示的支架间隙:1)与28%的ISR相关,46%的支架间隙存在ISR;2)单因素分析显示与直径≥3mm的支架相关(p=0.002),多因素分析则不然;3)在导管血管造影中很少见;4)在单个支架情况下很可能代表SF,在重叠支架中可能代表SF或OF。

相似文献

1
Stent gap by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography relationship to in-stent restenosis, fracture, and overlap failure.64层螺旋CT血管造影术测量的支架间隙与支架内再狭窄、断裂及重叠失败的关系
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 17;54(21):1949-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.045.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.320 排多层螺旋 CT 冠状动脉成像无创评估支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性。
Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun;45(6):331-40. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa312.
3
Prevalence and prognosis of coronary stent gap detected by multi-detector CT: a follow-up study.多排螺旋 CT 检测冠状动脉支架间隙的发生率及其对预后的影响:一项随访研究。
Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep;22(9):1896-903. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2458-6. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
4
Coronary in-stent restenosis: predisposing clinical and stent-related factors, diagnostic performance and analyses of inaccuracies in 320-row computed tomography angiography.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:相关临床及支架因素、诊断性能以及320排计算机断层扫描血管造影术的误差分析
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;32 Suppl 1:105-15. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0872-6. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis.64 层 CT 评价冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:影响评估和准确诊断的因素。
J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Feb;25(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181b5d813.
6
Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis.64排螺旋CT对有症状的疑似支架内再狭窄患者冠状动脉支架评估的应用价值
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jun 1;101(11):1567-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.042. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
7
Coronary in-stent restenosis: assessment with CT coronary angiography.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:CT 冠状动脉成像评估。
Radiology. 2012 Nov;265(2):410-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112363. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
8
[Diagnostic value of 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis].320层螺旋CT冠状动脉血管造影对评估支架内再狭窄的诊断价值
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;40(6):487-91.
9
Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography.使用64层计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架内通畅情况。
Coron Artery Dis. 2011 Dec;22(8):540-52. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32834c1a28.
10
Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT.应用64排CT对既往有冠状动脉支架植入史的患者进行评估。
Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):416-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452061199. Epub 2007 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Utilization of a Peripheral Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent to Treat Recurrent Coronary Stent Fracture.外周自膨式镍钛合金支架治疗复发性冠状动脉支架断裂的新应用
JACC Case Rep. 2025 May 28;30(12):103423. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.103423.
2
Coronary Stent Fracture Causing Myocardial Infarction: Case Report and Review of Literature.冠状动脉支架断裂导致心肌梗死:病例报告及文献综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 16;23(11):384. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311384. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Incidence of coronary drug-eluting stent fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
冠状动脉药物洗脱支架断裂的发生率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 23;9:925912. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.925912. eCollection 2022.
4
A patient with an hourglass shaped fractured coronary stent.一名患有沙漏形冠状动脉支架骨折的患者。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2021 Mar;17(1):116-121. doi: 10.5114/aic.2021.104780. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
The Value of Multi-slice Computed Tomography Compared to Conventional Coronary Angiography for Detecting In-stent Restenosis.多层螺旋计算机断层扫描与传统冠状动脉造影术在检测支架内再狭窄方面的价值比较
Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Jul 28;6:92. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.211796. eCollection 2017.
6
Finite Element Analysis of the Implantation Process of Overlapping Stents.重叠支架植入过程的有限元分析
J Med Device. 2017 Jun;11(2):0210101-210109. doi: 10.1115/1.4036391. Epub 2017 May 3.
7
Coronary in-stent restenosis: predisposing clinical and stent-related factors, diagnostic performance and analyses of inaccuracies in 320-row computed tomography angiography.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:相关临床及支架因素、诊断性能以及320排计算机断层扫描血管造影术的误差分析
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;32 Suppl 1:105-15. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0872-6. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
8
Stent fracture and longitudinal compression detected on coronary CT angiography in the first- and new-generation drug-eluting stents.第一代和新一代药物洗脱支架在冠状动脉CT血管造影中检测到的支架断裂和纵向压缩。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;32(4):637-46. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0798-4. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
Detection of Postcoronary Stent Complication: Utility of 64-Slice Multidetector CT.冠状动脉支架置入术后并发症的检测:64层螺旋CT的应用价值
Case Rep Cardiol. 2012;2012:214760. doi: 10.1155/2012/214760. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
10
Coronary stent fracture: a recently appreciated phenomenon with clinical relevance.冠状动脉支架断裂:一种最近才被认识到的具有临床相关性的现象。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014 Nov;10(4):349-54. doi: 10.2174/1573403x10666140404105923.