Pyshciatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 2071 N. Summit Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53202, USA.
Pyshciatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 2071 N. Summit Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53202, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Feb;70(3):351-359. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.029. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
HIV prevention researchers have increasingly advocated structural interventions that address factors in the social, political and economic context to reduce disparities of HIV/AIDS among disadvantaged populations. This paper draws on data collected in three different types of low-income communities (n=6) in the San Salvador metropolitan area in El Salvador. Nine focus group discussions were conducted between January 2006 and July 2007, 6 with community leaders, and 3 with crack cocaine users, as well as in-depth interviews with 20 crack users and crack dealers. We explore opportunities and barriers to the implementation of a community-level, structural intervention. We first analyze the different forms of leadership, and other community resources including existing HIV prevention activities that could potentially be used to address the related problems of crack use and HIV in the communities, and the structural factors that may act as barriers to capitalizing on communities' strengths in interventions. Each of the communities studied demonstrated different resources that stem from each community's unique history and geographic location. HIV testing and prevention resources varied widely among the communities, with resources concentrated in one Older Central community despite a strong need in all communities. In many communities, fear of gang violence and non-responsiveness by government agencies to communities' needs have discouraged community organizing. In the discussion, we offer concrete suggestions for developing and implementing structural interventions to reduce HIV risks that use communities' different but complementary resources.
艾滋病毒预防研究人员越来越提倡采取结构性干预措施,以解决社会、政治和经济环境中的各种因素,从而减少弱势人群中艾滋病毒/艾滋病的差异。本文借鉴了在萨尔瓦多圣萨尔瓦多大都市区的三种不同类型的低收入社区(n=6)收集的数据。2006 年 1 月至 2007 年 7 月期间,共进行了 9 次焦点小组讨论,其中 6 次是与社区领袖进行的,3 次是与吸食快克可卡因者进行的,还对 20 名吸食快克可卡因者和快克可卡因贩子进行了深入访谈。我们探讨了在社区层面实施结构性干预的机会和障碍。我们首先分析了不同形式的领导力,以及其他社区资源,包括现有的艾滋病毒预防活动,这些活动有可能被用来解决社区中与快克可卡因使用和艾滋病毒有关的问题,以及可能成为利用社区力量干预的结构性障碍。我们研究的每个社区都表现出不同的资源,这些资源源自每个社区独特的历史和地理位置。社区之间的艾滋病毒检测和预防资源差异很大,尽管所有社区都有强烈的需求,但资源集中在一个老中心社区。在许多社区中,对帮派暴力的恐惧以及政府机构对社区需求的不响应,阻碍了社区的组织化。在讨论中,我们提出了具体建议,以制定和实施结构性干预措施,利用社区不同但互补的资源来减少艾滋病毒风险。