Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA University of Bath, Bath, UK Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK Leeds Institute of Health Services, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Pain. 2010 Mar;148(3):387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
The purpose of this meta-analytic review was to quantify the effects of psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain in youth. Specifically, in this review we updated previous systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials by including new trials, and by adding disability and emotional functioning to pain as treatment outcomes. Electronic searches of the Cochrane Register of Randomised Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, EMBASE, and the Social Sciences Citation Index were conducted from inception through August 2008. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed, and data extracted on the three primary outcomes of interest. Twenty-five trials including 1247 young people met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analytic findings demonstrated a large positive effect of psychological intervention on pain reduction at immediate post-treatment and follow-up in youth with headache, abdominal pain, and fibromyalgia. Small and non-significant effects were found for improvements in disability and emotional functioning, although there were limited data on these outcomes available in the included studies. Omnibus cognitive-behavioral therapy, relaxation therapy, and biofeedback all produced significant and positive effects on pain reduction. Studies directly comparing the effects of self-administered versus therapist-administered interventions found similar effects on pain reduction. Psychological therapies result in improvement in pain relief across several different pain conditions in children. Future trials are needed that incorporate non-pain outcome domains, that focus significant therapeutic content on reductions in disability, and that include extended follow-up to better understand maintenance of treatment effects.
本荟萃分析旨在量化心理疗法对青少年慢性疼痛管理的疗效。具体而言,在本综述中,我们更新了先前的随机对照试验系统评价,纳入了新的试验,并将残疾和情绪功能纳入疼痛作为治疗结果。通过电子检索 Cochrane 随机对照试验注册库、MEDLINE、PsycLIT、EMBASE 和社会科学引文索引,检索时间截至 2008 年 8 月。评估了研究的方法学质量,并提取了三个主要结局指标的数据。25 项试验共纳入 1247 名青少年,符合纳入标准并纳入荟萃分析。荟萃分析结果表明,心理干预对头痛、腹痛和纤维肌痛青少年的即时治疗后和随访时的疼痛减轻具有显著的积极影响。在残疾和情绪功能的改善方面,发现效果较小且无统计学意义,尽管纳入研究中这些结局的数据有限。综合认知行为疗法、放松疗法和生物反馈均对疼痛减轻产生显著的积极影响。直接比较自我管理与治疗师管理干预效果的研究发现,两种方法对疼痛减轻的效果相似。心理疗法对几种不同疼痛状况下的疼痛缓解均有改善。需要进一步开展试验,纳入非疼痛结局指标,将重点放在减少残疾方面,并进行长期随访,以更好地了解治疗效果的维持。