EP Expert Doctors-Team Tsuchiya, Koto 3-14-28, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan.
Europace. 2009 Dec;11(12):1597-605. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup352. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
It is unclear how the amplitude of bipolar electrogram relates to the local conduction velocity (CV) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For 50 AF patients (paroxysmal/persistent AF: 40/10 patients), contact bipolar voltage maps of the left atrium (LA) were constructed during sinus rhythm using EnSite version 6.0J in a point-by-point recording fashion. Patients were divided into Groups A (n = 16), B (n = 19), and C (n = 15) according to the level of the lowest electrogram amplitudes: <0.5, 0.5-0.75, and 0.75-1.0 mV, respectively. Low-voltage zone (LVZ) was defined separately for these groups as a bipolar electrogram amplitude of <0.5, 0.5-0.75, and 0.75-1.0 mV, respectively. The local CV through the LVZ and non-LVZ was calculated along the direction of local activation within each zone for all groups.
Low-voltage zone was consistently found at the septal, anterior, and posterior LA in all groups. In Group A, CV through the LVZ was significantly slower compared with the non-LVZ (0.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.6 m/s, P = 0.004), but those through the LVZ and non-LVZ were similar in Group B (1.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.5 m/s, P = 0.07) and Group C (1.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.6 m/s, P = 0.79). The percentage of points showing fractionated or double potentials in the LVZ was significantly more in Group A (76/293 points, 26%) than in Group B (11/185 points, 6%), and Group C (7/135 points, 5%) (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively).
There was a significant slowing of local conduction in the LVZ defined as <0.5 mV and was frequently associated with fractionated or double potentials in patients with AF.
在心房颤动(AF)患者中,双极电图的幅度与局部传导速度(CV)之间的关系尚不清楚。对于 50 例 AF 患者(阵发性/持续性 AF:40/10 例),在窦性心律下使用 EnSite 版本 6.0J 以逐点记录的方式构建左心房(LA)的接触双极电压图。根据最低电图幅度水平将患者分为 A 组(n=16)、B 组(n=19)和 C 组(n=15):<0.5、0.5-0.75 和 0.75-1.0 mV。分别为这些组定义了低电压区(LVZ),即双极电图幅度分别为<0.5、0.5-0.75 和 0.75-1.0 mV。沿每个区域的局部激活方向计算 LVZ 和非 LVZ 之间的局部 CV。
在所有组中,LVZ 始终在房间隔、前壁和后壁 LA 中发现。在 A 组中,与非 LVZ 相比,LVZ 中的 CV 明显较慢(0.8±0.5 比 1.4±0.6 m/s,P=0.004),但 B 组和 C 组中 LVZ 和非 LVZ 之间的 CV 相似(1.2±0.5 比 1.3±0.5 m/s,P=0.07;1.5±0.5 比 1.4±0.6 m/s,P=0.79)。LVZ 中出现分数化或双电位的点数在 A 组(293 点中的 76/293 点,26%)明显多于 B 组(185 点中的 11/185 点,6%)和 C 组(135 点中的 7/135 点,5%)(P<0.0001 和 P<0.0001)。
在 AF 患者中,定义为<0.5 mV 的 LVZ 中存在局部传导的明显减慢,并且常伴有分数化或双电位。