Suppr超能文献

聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯或磷酸钙骨水泥椎体成形术后相邻椎体骨折:尸体脊柱的生物力学评估。

Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement: biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 15;34(24):2613-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abc150.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study using human cadaveric thoracolumbar spinal columns.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of treatment by vertebroplasty (VP) with polymethylmethacrylate cement and VP with calcium phosphate cement on the creation of adjacent vertebral body fracture following VP.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Adjacent vertebral body fractures have been reported as a complication following VP.

METHODS

Twenty-four spinal columns (T10-L2) from human cadavers were subjected to dual energy radiograph absorptiometry to assess bone mineral density. They were divided into the P group and C group, and experimental vertebral compression fractures were created at T12 vertebrae. T12 vertebrae were augmented with polymethylmethacrylate and calcium phosphate cement in the P group and C group, respectively. Each spinal column was compressed until a new fracture occurred at any vertebra, and the location of newly fractured vertebra and failure load was investigated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in bone mineral density at each level within each group. In the P group, a new fracture occurred at T10 in 2 specimens, T11 in 8, and L1 in 2. In the C group, it occurred at T10 in 1 specimen, T11 in 2, L1 in 1, and T12 (treated vertebra) in 8. The failure loads of the spinal column were 1774.8+/-672.3 N and 1501.2+/-556.5 N in the P group and C group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the failure load of the spinal column between each group.

CONCLUSION

New vertebral fractures occurred at the vertebra adjacent to augmented vertebrae in the P group and in the augmented vertebrae in the C group. The difference in the fractured site may be because of the difference in strength between the 2 bone filler materials. Therefore, the strength of bone filler materials is considered a risk factor in developing adjacent vertebral body fractures after VP.

摘要

研究设计

一项使用人体胸腰椎脊柱标本的生物力学研究。

目的

比较经皮椎体成形术(VP)联合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)骨水泥和 VP 联合磷酸钙骨水泥治疗对 VP 后相邻椎体骨折的影响。

背景资料概要

VP 后发生相邻椎体骨折已被报道为一种并发症。

方法

24 个人体脊柱标本(T10-L2)进行双能 X 线吸收法骨密度测定。将标本分为 P 组和 C 组,在 T12 椎体制作实验性椎体压缩性骨折。在 P 组和 C 组中,分别用 PMMA 和磷酸钙骨水泥进行 T12 椎体增强。每个脊柱标本均被压缩,直至任何椎体发生新的骨折,然后研究新骨折椎体的位置和失效载荷。

结果

每组内各水平的骨密度无显著差异。在 P 组中,2 例新骨折发生在 T10,8 例发生在 T11,2 例发生在 L1。在 C 组中,1 例发生在 T10,2 例发生在 T11,1 例发生在 L1,8 例发生在 T12(治疗椎体)。P 组和 C 组脊柱的失效载荷分别为 1774.8+/-672.3N 和 1501.2+/-556.5N。两组间脊柱的失效载荷无显著差异。

结论

P 组增强椎体的相邻椎体和 C 组增强椎体发生新的椎体骨折。骨折部位的差异可能是由于两种骨填充物的强度不同。因此,骨填充物的强度被认为是 VP 后发生相邻椎体骨折的一个危险因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验