• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线性和每日波动周期化抗阻训练比较以增加力量。

Comparison between linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training to increase strength.

机构信息

Physiological Sciences Department, Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2437-42. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c03548.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c03548
PMID:19910831
Abstract

To determine the most effective periodization model for strength and hypertrophy is an important step for strength and conditioning professionals. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of linear (LP) and daily undulating periodized (DUP) resistance training on body composition and maximal strength levels. Forty men aged 21.5 +/- 8.3 and with a minimum 1-year strength training experience were assigned to an LP (n = 20) or DUP group (n = 20). Subjects were tested for maximal strength in bench press, leg press 45 degrees, and arm curl (1 repetition maximum [RM]) at baseline (T1), after 8 weeks (T2), and after 12 weeks of training (T3). Increases of 18.2 and 25.08% in bench press 1 RM were observed for LP and DUP groups in T3 compared with T1, respectively (p < or = 0.05). In leg press 45 degrees , LP group exhibited an increase of 24.71% and DUP of 40.61% at T3 compared with T1. Additionally, DUP showed an increase of 12.23% at T2 compared with T1 and 25.48% at T3 compared with T2. For the arm curl exercise, LP group increased 14.15% and DUP 23.53% at T3 when compared with T1. An increase of 20% was also found at T2 when compared with T1, for DUP. Although the DUP group increased strength the most in all exercises, no statistical differences were found between groups. In conclusion, undulating periodized strength training induced higher increases in maximal strength than the linear model in strength-trained men. For maximizing strength increases, daily intensity and volume variations were more effective than weekly variations.

摘要

确定最有效的力量和肥大周期化模型对于力量和调节专业人员来说是一个重要的步骤。本研究的目的是比较线性(LP)和每日波动周期化(DUP)抗阻训练对身体成分和最大力量水平的影响。40 名年龄为 21.5 +/- 8.3 岁、最少有 1 年力量训练经验的男性被分配到 LP(n = 20)或 DUP 组(n = 20)。受试者在基线(T1)、8 周后(T2)和 12 周训练后(T3)测试卧推、腿举 45 度和臂弯举(1 次重复最大[RM])的最大力量。与 T1 相比,LP 和 DUP 组在 T3 时的卧推 1RM 分别增加了 18.2%和 25.08%(p<0.05)。在腿举 45 度方面,LP 组在 T3 时比 T1 时增加了 24.71%,DUP 组增加了 40.61%。此外,与 T1 相比,DUP 在 T2 时增加了 12.23%,在 T3 时增加了 25.48%。对于臂弯举运动,与 T1 相比,LP 组在 T3 时增加了 14.15%,DUP 组增加了 23.53%。与 T1 相比,DUP 在 T2 时也增加了 20%。尽管 DUP 组在所有运动中增加的力量最大,但组间无统计学差异。总之,波动周期化力量训练在力量训练的男性中引起的最大力量增加比线性模型更多。为了最大限度地提高力量增加,每日强度和容量变化比每周变化更有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison between linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training to increase strength.线性和每日波动周期化抗阻训练比较以增加力量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2437-42. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c03548.
2
A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength.针对力量训练,对具有相等训练量和强度的线性周期化训练计划与每日波动周期化训练计划进行比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 May;16(2):250-5.
3
Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains.线性与每日波动周期化抗阻训练对最大和次最大力量增益的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jul;25(7):1824-30. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e7ff75.
4
Comparison of linear and reverse linear periodization effects on maximal strength and body composition.线性和反向线性周期化对最大力量和身体成分影响的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jan;23(1):266-74. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874bf3.
5
Comparison of resistance training progression models on maximal strength in sub-elite adolescent rugby union players.次精英青少年橄榄球联盟球员最大力量的阻力训练进展模型比较
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Feb;19(2):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
6
Linear and daily undulating resistance training periodizations have differential beneficial effects in young sedentary women.线性和每日波动阻力训练分期在年轻久坐女性中有不同的有益效果。
Int J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;33(9):723-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306324. Epub 2012 May 4.
7
Comparison of Powerlifting Performance in Trained Men Using Traditional and Flexible Daily Undulating Periodization.使用传统和灵活每日波动周期化训练的男性力量举表现比较
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Feb;31(2):283-291. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001500.
8
Nonlinear periodization maximizes strength gains in split resistance training routines.非线性周期化训练在分体式抗阻训练计划中能使力量增长最大化。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jul;23(4):1321-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00f96.
9
Early-phase adaptations to a split-body, linear periodization resistance training program in college-aged and middle-aged men.大学年龄段和中年男性对分体式、线性周期化抗阻训练计划的早期适应情况。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):962-71. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00baf.
10
A comparison of periodization models during nine weeks with equated volume and intensity for strength.九周内力量训练量和强度相等的周期化模型比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1245-50. doi: 10.1519/R-20446.1.

引用本文的文献

1
The urinary bladder wall is remodeled by undulatory resistance training in female Wistar rats.在雌性Wistar大鼠中,通过波动阻力训练重塑膀胱壁。
PeerJ. 2025 Mar 31;13:e19172. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19172. eCollection 2025.
2
The Development of a Return to Performance Pathway Involving A Professional Soccer Player Returning From A Multi-Structural Knee Injury: A Case Report.一名职业足球运动员从多结构膝关节损伤中恢复的重返赛场路径的发展:病例报告
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Apr 2;18(2):450-466. doi: 10.26603/001c.73317. eCollection 2023.
3
Effects of lower-extremity explosive strength on youth judo athletes adopting different types of power-based resistance training.
下肢爆发力对采用不同类型基于力量的阻力训练的青少年柔道运动员的影响。
Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1065036. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1065036. eCollection 2023.
4
Muscle Daily Undulating Periodization for Strength and Body Composition: The Proposal of a New Model.用于力量和身体成分的肌肉每日波动周期化训练:一种新模型的提议
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Jan 1;15(4):206-220. doi: 10.70252/JDHQ8772. eCollection 2022.
5
Exercise Selection and Common Injuries in Fitness Centers: A Systematic Integrative Review and Practical Recommendations.健身中心的运动选择和常见损伤:系统综合评价及实用推荐。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;19(19):12710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912710.
6
The influence of considering individual resistance training variables as a whole on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.整体考虑个体抗阻训练变量对肌肉力量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0262674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262674. eCollection 2022.
7
Effects of Periodization on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Equated Resistance Training Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.周期性对等容量抗阻训练计划中力量和肌肉肥大的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2022 Jul;52(7):1647-1666. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01636-1. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Bilateral back squat strength is increased during a 3-week undulating resistance training program with and without variable resistance in DIII collegiate football players.在为期3周的波动阻力训练计划中,无论有无可变阻力,三级大学橄榄球运动员的双侧后蹲力量都会增加。
PeerJ. 2021 Sep 24;9:e12189. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12189. eCollection 2021.
9
Periodization: Variation in the Definition and Discrepancies in Study Design.分期:定义的变化和研究设计的差异。
Sports Med. 2021 Apr;51(4):625-651. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01414-5. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
Training Programs Designed for Muscle Hypertrophy in Bodybuilders: A Narrative Review.为健美运动员肌肉肥大设计的训练计划:一项叙述性综述。
Sports (Basel). 2020 Nov 18;8(11):149. doi: 10.3390/sports8110149.