Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, St Luke's Campus, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Cephalalgia. 2009 Dec;29(12):1311-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01872.x.
The aim was to describe the consulting behaviour and clinical outcomes of children presenting with headache in primary care. This was a historical cohort study using data from the UK General Practitioner Research Database. Cases were children aged 5-17 years who presented to primary care with primary headache (migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache) or undifferentiated headache (no further descriptor). Controls were age, sex and practice matched. Their records were examined for consultations, referrals, relevant treatments and specific diseases in the subsequent year. Children with headache (n = 48 575) were identified and matched to controls. At presentation, 9321 (19.2%) of headaches were labelled primary, 549 (1.1%) secondary and 38 705 (79.7%) received no formal diagnosis. Of the latter group, 2084 (5.4%) received a primary headache diagnosis in the subsequent year. Following a diagnosis of migraine, 258 (3.5%) had received a triptan and 1598 (21%) were using propranolol or pizotifen. Total consultations were higher in cases than in controls in the year before the headache: cases ages 5-8 years, mean (s.d.) 5.0 (4.0) consultations; controls 4.0 (3.5) consultations. In 1 year controls had 43 430 consultations, of which 256 (0.6%) were for headache, of whom 64 (25%) were referred to secondary care. Headache was a risk factor for benign and malignant tumours, cerebrovascular disease, primary disorders of raised intracranial pressure and depression. This risk was reduced if a diagnosis of a primary headache disorder could be made. Although there is an increased likelihood of a serious pathology with headache presentations, the risk is small particularly if a diagnosis of a primary headache is made. General practitioners are likely to be underdiagnosing migraine. This study can inform management guidelines for new presentations of headache in primary care, particularly when a secondary pathology is suspected.
目的在于描述初级保健中出现头痛的儿童的就诊行为和临床结局。这是一项基于英国全科医生研究数据库的历史队列研究。病例为 5-17 岁因原发性头痛(偏头痛、紧张型头痛、丛集性头痛)或未分化性头痛(无进一步描述)就诊初级保健的儿童。对照组为年龄、性别和实践匹配。在随后的一年中,检查了他们的就诊记录、转诊记录、相关治疗和特定疾病。确定了患有头痛的儿童(n=48575)并与对照组相匹配。就诊时,9321 例(19.2%)头痛被标记为原发性,549 例(1.1%)为继发性,38705 例(79.7%)未接受正式诊断。在后一组中,2084 例(5.4%)在随后的一年中被诊断为原发性头痛。偏头痛诊断后,258 例(3.5%)接受了曲坦类药物治疗,1598 例(21%)使用普萘洛尔或匹莫齐特。在头痛前一年,病例组的总就诊次数高于对照组:5-8 岁病例组,平均值(标准差)为 5.0(4.0)次就诊;对照组为 4.0(3.5)次就诊。在 1 年内,对照组有 43430 次就诊,其中 256 次(0.6%)为头痛就诊,其中 64 次(25%)被转诊至二级保健。头痛是良性和恶性肿瘤、脑血管疾病、原发性颅内压升高和抑郁的危险因素。如果能做出原发性头痛障碍的诊断,则风险会降低。尽管头痛就诊可能存在严重病理的可能性增加,但风险很小,特别是如果做出原发性头痛的诊断。全科医生可能对偏头痛的诊断不足。本研究可为初级保健中出现新的头痛症状提供管理指南,特别是在怀疑存在继发性疾病时。