• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于熟悉物体的触觉识别,左右有区别吗?

Do left and right matter for haptic recognition of familiar objects?

作者信息

Craddock Matt, Lawson Rebecca

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK.

出版信息

Perception. 2009;38(9):1355-76. doi: 10.1068/p6312.

DOI:10.1068/p6312
PMID:19911633
Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to examine the effects of dominant right versus non-dominant left exploration hand and left versus right object orientation on haptic recognition of familiar objects. In experiment 1, participants named 48 familiar objects in two blocks. There was no dominant-hand advantage to naming objects haptically and there was no interaction between exploration hand and object orientation. Furthermore, priming of naming was not reduced by changes of either object orientation or exploration hand. To test whether these results were attributable to a failure to encode object orientation and exploration hand, experiment 2 replicated experiment 1 except that the unexpected task in the second block was to decide whether either exploration hand or object orientation had changed relative to the initial naming block. Performance on both tasks was above chance, demonstrating that this information had been encoded into long-term haptic representations following the initial block of naming. Thus when identifying familiar objects, the haptic processing system can achieve object constancy efficiently across hand changes and object-orientation changes, although this information is often stored even when it is task-irrelevant.

摘要

进行了两项实验,以检验优势右手与非优势左手探索以及物体向左与向右方向对熟悉物体触觉识别的影响。在实验1中,参与者在两个阶段对48个熟悉物体进行命名。在通过触觉命名物体时没有优势手优势,并且探索手和物体方向之间没有交互作用。此外,物体方向或探索手的变化不会减少命名的启动效应。为了测试这些结果是否归因于未能编码物体方向和探索手,实验2重复了实验1,不同之处在于第二个阶段的意外任务是判断探索手或物体方向相对于初始命名阶段是否发生了变化。两项任务的表现均高于随机水平,表明在初始命名阶段之后,这些信息已被编码到长期触觉表征中。因此,在识别熟悉物体时,尽管这些信息在与任务无关时通常也会被存储,但触觉处理系统可以有效地在手部变化和物体方向变化中实现物体恒常性。

相似文献

1
Do left and right matter for haptic recognition of familiar objects?对于熟悉物体的触觉识别,左右有区别吗?
Perception. 2009;38(9):1355-76. doi: 10.1068/p6312.
2
Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects.重复启动效应与熟悉和不熟悉物体的触觉识别
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Oct;70(7):1350-65. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1350.
3
Where you look can influence haptic object recognition.你注视的地方会影响触觉物体识别。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Feb;76(2):559-74. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0579-x.
4
Enhanced visuo-haptic integration for the non-dominant hand.非优势手的视觉-触觉整合增强。
Brain Res. 2015 Jul 21;1614:75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
5
Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts.通过手和脚识别熟悉的物体:触觉形状感知可推广到来自不寻常位置和未经训练的身体部位的输入。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Feb;76(2):541-58. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0559-1.
6
Pure associative tactile agnosia for the left hand: clinical and anatomo-functional correlations.左手的纯联想性触觉失认症:临床与解剖功能相关性
Cortex. 2014 Sep;58:206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
7
Two hands, one perception: how bimanual haptic information is combined by the brain.双手,一种感知:大脑如何整合双手触觉信息。
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(2):544-50. doi: 10.1152/jn.00756.2010. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
8
Haptic recognition of familiar objects: examining lateralization of specificity effects.熟悉物体的触觉识别:特异性效应的偏侧化研究
Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Oct;119(2):430-9. doi: 10.2466/22.24.PMS.119c24z6. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
9
Canonical views in haptic object perception.触觉物体感知中的典型观点。
Perception. 2008;37(12):1867-78. doi: 10.1068/p6038.
10
The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition.尺寸变化对触觉物体识别的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 May;71(4):910-23. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.910.

引用本文的文献

1
Haptic and visuo-haptic impairments for object recognition in children with autism spectrum disorder: focus on the sensory and multisensory processing dysfunctions.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的触觉和视触觉障碍对物体识别的影响:关注感觉和多感觉处理功能障碍。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Jul;242(7):1731-1744. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06855-2. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
Effects of Line Separation and Exploration on the Visual and Haptic Detection of Symmetry and Repetition.线条分隔与探索对对称性和重复性的视觉及触觉检测的影响。
Exp Psychol. 2016 Jul;63(4):197-214. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000329.
3
Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.
视触觉多感官物体识别、分类和表示。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 17;5:730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00730. eCollection 2014.
4
Time course of information processing in visual and haptic object classification.视觉和触觉物体分类中信息处理的时间进程。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 23;6:49. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00049. eCollection 2012.