• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对麻醉领域医生与护士协作的态度。

Attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration in anesthesia.

作者信息

Taylor Cassandra L

机构信息

Charleston Area Medical Center, School of Nurse Anesthesia, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.

出版信息

AANA J. 2009 Oct;77(5):343-8.

PMID:19911643
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the attitudes of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists toward collaboration with each other. Data for this descriptive, comparative study were gathered through a mailed survey to 501 nurse anesthetists and 353 anesthesiologists licensed to practice in 7 state of the United States. Attitude toward collaboration was measured using an adaptation of the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration. The mean total scores were compared using the t test for independent groups. Mean total scores were higher for the nurse anesthetist group (n = 238) compared with the anesthesiologist group (n = 66). Analysis demonstrated that this difference was significant (t = 14.6, P < .05). Additional analyses failed to show a significant difference based on sexual gender. The results of this study provide some evidence that the divergent perspectives regarding collaboration previously demonstrated between physicians and nurses may also exist in the specialty field of anesthesia. This study provided no support for the supposition that gender contributes to the differences in attitude toward collaboration between physicians and nurses.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较麻醉医师和麻醉护士相互协作的态度。这项描述性比较研究的数据是通过对美国7个州501名麻醉护士和353名有执业资格的麻醉医师进行邮寄调查收集的。使用改编后的杰斐逊医生 - 护士协作态度量表来衡量协作态度。使用独立样本t检验比较平均总分。与麻醉医师组(n = 66)相比,麻醉护士组(n = 238)的平均总分更高。分析表明这种差异具有统计学意义(t = 14.6,P <.05)。进一步分析未显示基于性别的显著差异。本研究结果提供了一些证据,表明之前在医生和护士之间表现出的关于协作的不同观点在麻醉专业领域可能也存在。本研究不支持性别导致医生和护士协作态度差异的假设。

相似文献

1
Attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration in anesthesia.对麻醉领域医生与护士协作的态度。
AANA J. 2009 Oct;77(5):343-8.
2
CRNA-physician collaboration in anesthesia.麻醉护理师与医师在麻醉方面的协作。
AANA J. 2009 Dec;77(6):431-6.
3
Professional collaboration in students of Medicine Faculty and School of Nursing.医学专业学生与护理专业学生之间的专业协作。
Nurse Educ Today. 2010 May;30(4):350-4. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
4
A closer look at the "supervision" and "direction" of certified registered nurse anesthetists.深入审视注册麻醉护士的“监督”与“指导”。
Can Nurse. 2008 Mar;104(3):28-33.
5
Perceptions that affect physician-nurse collaboration in the perioperative setting.影响围手术期医生与护士协作的认知。
AORN J. 2007 Jul;86(1):45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.06.009.
6
A study of occupational stress, scope of practice, and collaboration in nurse anesthetists practicing in anesthesia care team settings.一项关于在麻醉护理团队环境中执业的麻醉护士职业压力、执业范围及协作情况的研究。
AANA J. 2005 Dec;73(6):443-52.
7
[Descriptive study regarding nurse physician collaboration in a Local Health Unit in Veneto (Italy)].[关于意大利威尼托地区一个地方卫生单位护士与医生协作的描述性研究]
Prof Inferm. 2009 Apr-Jun;62(2):109-19.
8
Turkish version of the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration: a preliminary study.《杰斐逊医生与护士合作态度量表》土耳其语版本:一项初步研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2006 Oct;23(1):38-45. doi: 10.5172/conu.2006.23.1.38.
9
Nurse-physician collaboration: a comparison of the attitudes of nurses and physicians in the medical-surgical patient care setting.护士与医生的协作:内科-外科患者护理环境中护士与医生态度的比较
Medsurg Nurs. 2007 Apr;16(2):87-91, 104.
10
Working together--primary care doctors' and nurses' attitudes to collaboration.共同合作——初级保健医生和护士的协作态度。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(1):78-85. doi: 10.1177/1403494809347405. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Physician-Nurse Relations Through the Lens of Intersectionality: A Scoping Review.通过交叉性视角探索医患关系:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2025 May 7;17(5):e83685. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83685. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Attitudes of Physicians and Nurses Toward Interprofessional Collaboration: a Systematic Literature Review.医生和护士对跨专业协作的态度:一项系统文献综述
Mater Sociomed. 2025;37(1):64-73. doi: 10.5455/msm.2025.37.64-73.
3
Measuring Stereotypes in Interprofessional Education: A Pilot High-Fidelity Simulation Study Among Postgraduate Nursing and Physician Students in a Spanish University.
跨专业教育中刻板印象的测量:西班牙一所大学研究生护理专业和医学专业学生的高保真模拟试点研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;12(23):2449. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232449.
4
Defining Physician-Nurse Efforts toward Collaboration as Perceived by Medical Students.医学生所认为的医生与护士为实现协作所付出的努力的定义。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;11(13):1919. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131919.
5
A prospective randomized study for the placement of flexible laryngeal airway mask with two-step jaw-thrust technique by both hands for adults.一项针对成人采用双手两步提颌法放置柔性喉罩气道的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):1060-1067. eCollection 2022.
6
Nurses and Physicians Attitudes toward Nurse-Physician Collaboration: A Survey from Gaza Strip, Palestine.护士和医生对医护协作的态度:来自巴勒斯坦加沙地带的一项调查。
Nurs Res Pract. 2017;2017:7406278. doi: 10.1155/2017/7406278. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
7
Labouring Together: collaborative alliances in maternity care in Victoria, Australia-protocol of a mixed-methods study.共同努力:澳大利亚维多利亚州孕产妇护理中的合作联盟——一项混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 7;7(3):e014262. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014262.
8
Perspectives on a Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Implementation of Planned Emergent Use Research.关于多学科团队方法在实施计划中的紧急使用研究方面的观点。
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Sep 19;21:2794-800. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894327.
9
Attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration in Pediatric Workers and Undergraduate Medical/Nursing Students.儿科工作人员及医学/护理专业本科生对医护协作的态度。
Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:846498. doi: 10.1155/2015/846498. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
10
Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: a systematic review of validity evidence and outcomes.内科中的团队合作评估:有效性证据与结果的系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):894-910. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2686-8. Epub 2013 Dec 11.